Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: omega3000 on 02 November 2012, 13:03:12

Title: At it again
Post by: omega3000 on 02 November 2012, 13:03:12

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-20178332#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

  Just a slap on the wrists maybe  ::)

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: cleggy on 02 November 2012, 13:55:16

Suspended from the commons and had the labour party  whip removed for 12 months. It is not enough >:( >:( Surely fraud is a criminal offence, court and if found guilty around 5 years ( a parliamentary term) I think. :y :y

These bastards can't keep their noses out of the trough, now the political parties want their man to be to be a police commisoner, not someone who understands policing, qualified to do the job or indeed will do what the people want but another self serving politician >:( >:(

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: Kevin Wood on 02 November 2012, 13:58:10

Oh, but it's all OK because, despite committing fraud, he said sorry and paid it back.

Yep, I'll try that on with the inland revenue, shall I? ;D

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: omega3000 on 02 November 2012, 14:25:40

http://order-order.com/

 Wonder who paid for that cake  >:(

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: razzo on 02 November 2012, 16:09:42

so does he get suspended on full pay  >:(

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: dbug on 02 November 2012, 16:16:37

Quote from: razzo on 02 November 2012, 16:09:42

so does he get suspended on full pay  >:(

Probably - and no doubt will get a bonus for his dishonesty as well  >:(

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: BazaJT on 02 November 2012, 20:40:23

Oh,come now are we all saying we don't believe him when he says it was a mistake?Think his only mistake was getting caught!!Seems now that he has resigned,so that makes it all alright,Idon't think so squire!The police apparently looked into this and decided to take no action but are now being "urged"to look at it again.Any poor working sod caught doing similar would have been instantly sacked,and been in court,and probably doing time for it.What makes them[and they're all at it]so different?All of those found to have made fraudulent expenses claims should have faced legal proceedings.

Title: Re: At it again
Post by: omega3000 on 03 November 2012, 09:21:01

Quote

Former minister Denis MacShane could not be prosecuted because House of Commons rules prevented his letters being used against him, it has emerged.

Let me get this right , so he commits a crime/s then the house of commons already had a ruling in to protect his a$$ if he did  ::) No doubt he has a nice little nest egg to retire on .