Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: cem_devecioglu on 02 January 2013, 10:58:15

Title: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 02 January 2013, 10:58:15
I think except Subaru, other brands claim that their cars are 4wd ;D  and the lies of the lier dont continue even until midnight ;D ;D
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_MXK2nzt2Y (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_MXK2nzt2Y)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: geoffr70 on 02 January 2013, 11:06:42
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 02 January 2013, 11:07:58
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

I think must be same..  all wheels must mean 4 wheels logically..
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: Entwood on 02 January 2013, 11:29:51
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

I think must be same..  all wheels must mean 4 wheels logically..

I disagree....  4WD usually means MECHANICAL control, with a complicated drive train and a FIXED front/rear split.

AWD seems to be this crappy electronic control that varies the split whenever the ECU decides it should.. mate has a Volvo AWD thing .. supposedly 60/40 front rear "until required" when it puts power to any non-spinning wheel... sort of a very fancy traction control ... but it gets easily confused when on very slippy mud with a very large 'van on the back ... and each wheel spins in turn !!!! - sorted very quickly with a tow rope and an ancient "proper" 4WD --- an old landrover !
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 02 January 2013, 11:50:35
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

I think must be same..  all wheels must mean 4 wheels logically..

I disagree....  4WD usually means MECHANICAL control, with a complicated drive train and a FIXED front/rear split.

AWD seems to be this crappy electronic control that varies the split whenever the ECU decides it should.. mate has a Volvo AWD thing .. supposedly 60/40 front rear "until required" when it puts power to any non-spinning wheel... sort of a very fancy traction control ... but it gets easily confused when on very slippy mud with a very large 'van on the back ... and each wheel spins in turn !!!! - sorted very quickly with a tow rope and an ancient "proper" 4WD --- an old landrover !

Thanks for the info Entwood..  :y
 
here is a detailed link..
http://www.carsales.com.au/advice/2010/what-is-the-difference-between-4wd-and-awd-7530 (http://www.carsales.com.au/advice/2010/what-is-the-difference-between-4wd-and-awd-7530)
 
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: Andy B on 02 January 2013, 12:10:23
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

I think must be same..  all wheels must mean 4 wheels logically..

I disagree....  4WD usually means MECHANICAL control, with a complicated drive train and a FIXED front/rear split.

AWD seems to be this crappy electronic control that varies the split whenever the ECU decides it should.. mate has a Volvo AWD thing .. supposedly 60/40 front rear "until required" when it puts power to any non-spinning wheel... sort of a very fancy traction control ... but it gets easily confused when on very slippy mud with a very large 'van on the back ... and each wheel spins in turn !!!! - sorted very quickly with a tow rope and an ancient "proper" 4WD --- an old landrover !

I've yet to put my '4Matic' to the test  ::)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: omega3000 on 02 January 2013, 14:11:53
Maybe just as rubbish off road as well  ::)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: Andy B on 02 January 2013, 14:20:11
Maybe just as rubbish off road as well  ::)

You've had experience of being behind the wheel of one then ................  ::)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: geoffr70 on 02 January 2013, 15:56:09
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: aaronjb on 02 January 2013, 16:01:00
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 02 January 2013, 17:25:53
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

ok..everyone sends 50£ s.. And I will inform you how comfortable is a new one.. ;D ;D
 
and will send you a picture ;D :y
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: Kevin Wood on 02 January 2013, 17:49:56
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

..with the added advantage that it can actually go in a straight line and doesn't pee EP90 everywhere. :y
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: TheBoy on 02 January 2013, 18:30:30
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.
Shame they will soon be replaced :(

Hopefully the new one will be as capable. And hopefully more comfortable!
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: ianu on 02 January 2013, 19:48:37
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

I think must be same..  all wheels must mean 4 wheels logically..

I disagree....  4WD usually means MECHANICAL control, with a complicated drive train and a FIXED front/rear split.

AWD seems to be this crappy electronic control that varies the split whenever the ECU decides it should.. mate has a Volvo AWD thing .. supposedly 60/40 front rear "until required" when it puts power to any non-spinning wheel... sort of a very fancy traction control ... but it gets easily confused when on very slippy mud with a very large 'van on the back ... and each wheel spins in turn !!!! - sorted very quickly with a tow rope and an ancient "proper" 4WD --- an old landrover !

I also have a Volvo AWD thingy - never had any problems  ::)  :y
http://s1193.beta.photobucket.com/us...d5a73.mp4.html

http://s1193.beta.photobucket.com/us...ideo4.mp4.html

 :-*
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: ianu on 02 January 2013, 19:51:03
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

I think must be same..  all wheels must mean 4 wheels logically..

I disagree....  4WD usually means MECHANICAL control, with a complicated drive train and a FIXED front/rear split.

AWD seems to be this crappy electronic control that varies the split whenever the ECU decides it should.. mate has a Volvo AWD thing .. supposedly 60/40 front rear "until required" when it puts power to any non-spinning wheel... sort of a very fancy traction control ... but it gets easily confused when on very slippy mud with a very large 'van on the back ... and each wheel spins in turn !!!! - sorted very quickly with a tow rope and an ancient "proper" 4WD --- an old landrover !

I also have a Volvo AWD thingy - never had any problems  ::)  :y
http://s1193.beta.photobucket.com/us...d5a73.mp4.html

http://s1193.beta.photobucket.com/us...ideo4.mp4.html

 :-*

2nd time hopefully:
(http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa344/ianu2/th_J2offroad_0001_zps5e4d5a73.jpg) (http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa344/ianu2/J2offroad_0001_zps5e4d5a73.mp4)

(http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa344/ianu2/XC90%20off%20road/th_Video4.jpg) (http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa344/ianu2/XC90%20off%20road/Video4.mp4)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: YZ250 on 02 January 2013, 20:01:49
Interesting, is there a difference between traditional 4wd and awd? A friend was telling me about some sort of inferior 4wd system on his Audi TT; being bored to death by Audis I wasn't listening.

Haldex.  ;)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: geoffr70 on 02 January 2013, 23:11:49
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

I wouldn't want to jetwash the inside of a subaru though, whereas if it's a Defender, game on! It doesn't matter if you crash a Defender either (reallly it doesn't!), it all adds to it's character!
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 02 January 2013, 23:17:09
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

I wouldn't want to jetwash the inside of a subaru though, whereas if it's a Defender, game on! It doesn't matter if you crash a Defender either (reallly it doesn't!), it all adds to it's character!

I would prefer a subaru anytime.. besides crashing a car converts it to a pile of junk soon..
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: geoffr70 on 02 January 2013, 23:44:13
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

I wouldn't want to jetwash the inside of a subaru though, whereas if it's a Defender, game on! It doesn't matter if you crash a Defender either (reallly it doesn't!), it all adds to it's character!

I would prefer a subaru anytime.. besides crashing a car converts it to a pile of junk soon..

Not a defender.
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: geoffr70 on 03 January 2013, 01:57:37
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZrhuSE_ivA&feature=endscreen&NR=1

defenders go anywhere
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: Auto Addict on 03 January 2013, 05:46:34
Is a Unicycle an AWD? ::)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: plym ian on 03 January 2013, 07:15:43
why does all them 4 wheel drive/awd's all look exactly alike, there's no imagination now when designing cars anymore  :( :( :(
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: aaronjb on 03 January 2013, 09:33:19
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

I wouldn't want to jetwash the inside of a subaru though, whereas if it's a Defender, game on! It doesn't matter if you crash a Defender either (reallly it doesn't!), it all adds to it's character!

Agreed - and if I wanted something to get up to it's axles in mud it'd be a Defender, for sure :) On the other hand if I wanted to spend any significant time on the roads .. I wouldn't ;)

Having said that, if Defenders could be picked up cheaply (er, I should add, roadworthy Defenders.. ;D) I'd be tempted, just for fun.
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 03 January 2013, 11:36:07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZrhuSE_ivA&feature=endscreen&NR=1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZrhuSE_ivA&feature=endscreen&NR=1)

defenders go anywhere

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NPq4kv9k7E (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NPq4kv9k7E)
 
subaru .. any day..
 
 
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: aaronjb on 03 January 2013, 11:54:28
Cem, even the description of that video states:

"First and foremost, the Defender is by far the better off road choice."

Put that Subaru in 50cm of water and see if it's still running, for a start ;)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: Marks DTM Calib on 03 January 2013, 11:54:59
You can't beat a defender, they'll go just about anywhere if driven properly.

I bet a Subaru will be more comfortable the other 99% of the time though (having been in my other half's Dad's Defender 110!)  ;D

..with the added advantage that it can actually go in a straight line and doesn't pee EP90 everywhere. :y

Not so sure on the EP90 leaking issues though.....
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: feeutfo on 03 January 2013, 12:05:48
It's a good job there's no hills like that on my commute. ::)

Plenty of 4wd's though. Sigh...
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: aaronjb on 03 January 2013, 12:07:55
It's a good job there's no hills like that on my commute. ::)

Plenty of 4wd's though. Sigh...

Speaking of .. I saw a dark coloured Omega saloon this morning and thought for a moment that it was yours; until I got close enough to see it was a standard looking 2.6.

Must get my eyes tested  :-X :-[
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: feeutfo on 03 January 2013, 12:13:26
It's a good job there's no hills like that on my commute. ::)

Plenty of 4wd's though. Sigh...

Speaking of .. I saw a dark coloured Omega saloon this morning and thought for a moment that it was yours; until I got close enough to see it was a standard looking 2.6.

Must get my eyes tested  :-X :-[
no commute for me today ;)
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 03 January 2013, 13:38:40
Cem, even the description of that video states:

"First and foremost, the Defender is by far the better off road choice."

Put that Subaru in 50cm of water and see if it's still running, for a start ;)

its the video makers opinion , not mine ;D 
 
how is that ;D  just google suby in deep water and mud :y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QquhqGu9ig (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QquhqGu9ig)
 
 
Title: Re: AWD uphill comparison
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 03 January 2013, 13:42:41
and this one :o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vL8nMjaGWw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vL8nMjaGWw)