Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Varche on 27 April 2013, 12:08:15

Title: Darwinism?
Post by: Varche on 27 April 2013, 12:08:15
Had to smile at the withdrawal of packets of monkey nuts because they weren't labelled as peanuts.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165

Bleach labelled "not for drinking".

3 out of 10 teenagers didn't know who Renoir was. Some even thought he was a footballer with Paris St Germain. ;D ;D ;D

Are we breeding common sense and knowledge out of people? They have after all got a hand held device that they can look up anything on if in doubt!
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 27 April 2013, 13:58:34
It is more a case of companies being desperate to avoid litigation and so they have to cross all the "T's" and dot every "I". ;)

As for gaps in knowledge, that is not unusual and has been the case ever since humans started to walk the Earth.  Unless you study, or are really interested in a subject, names of artists as in this case will not be known.  But, I bet,  the same youngsters will know far more about computers and their programmes than I will ever know! ::) ::) ;D ;D ;)

 
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: cleggy on 27 April 2013, 14:26:26
To inrease the gene pool we could always cull those with an I.Q less than say 80 ???  ;D ;D

P.S I'm well safe ;D ;D ;D who said MENSA :D :D
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 27 April 2013, 15:03:27
To inrease the gene pool we could always cull those with an I.Q less than say 80 ???  ;D ;D

P.S I'm well safe ;D ;D ;D who said MENSA :D :D

You stirrer Cleggy! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :y :y
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 27 April 2013, 16:02:22
To inrease the gene pool we could always cull those with an I.Q less than say 80 ???  ;D ;D

P.S I'm well safe ;D ;D ;D who said MENSA :D :D


That would be the finish of OOF. ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Varche on 27 April 2013, 18:55:44
I think it would be fair to say you can have knowledge without needing a Mensa IQ.

The point is that the gaps in peoples knowledge are due (in my opinion) to laziness. Being spoon fed rather than discovering. How many people read or do practical stuff? 
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 27 April 2013, 19:30:37
I think it would be fair to say you can have knowledge without needing a Mensa IQ.

The point is that the gaps in peoples knowledge are due (in my opinion) to laziness. Being spoon fed rather than discovering. How many people read or do practical stuff?

But Varche, as I said before:
"As for gaps in knowledge, that is not unusual and has been the case ever since humans started to walk the Earth.  Unless you study, or are really interested in a subject, names of artists as in this case will not be known.  But, I bet,  the same youngsters will know far more about computers and their programmes than I will ever know!"

In other words, it is not somebody being lazy to have gaps in their knowledge, but rather more a case of their true needs in life.  A computer expert, police officer, or social worker will each have their specialist areas in which they gain knowledge because they need it professionally.  A mother with  six kids will require different knowledge and skills to keep her family safe and secure.  How many of them will know the link between Thomas Hobbes, Galileo, Bacon, Mersenne, and Gassendi?  I do because I have studied that period of history, but I don't expect most people in the street to know.  Why should they?  As I know about the sinking of HMS Hood, or the Battle of Trafalgar, and it's implications, along with the thoughts of Field Marshall Erwin Rommel on Hitler; then there is the development of the railways, etc, etc, etc.  But again I know nothing about computer workings and so much more because I never had to, as all I had to know was how to run a £ multi-million business with 3,500 staff along with financial management, property management, security management, HR management, etc, etc. Would I know any of that if I had not needed to? No is the easy answer ;D ;D ;D ;)
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 27 April 2013, 19:34:02
Had to smile at the withdrawal of packets of monkey nuts because they weren't labelled as peanuts.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165)

Bleach labelled "not for drinking".

3 out of 10 teenagers didn't know who Renoir was. Some even thought he was a footballer with Paris St Germain. ;D ;D ;D

Are we breeding common sense and knowledge out of people? They have after all got a hand held device that they can look up anything on if in doubt!

 ;D ;D ;D
 
 
now an info for you, here there are some religous groups that are also paid to proove darwinism was wrong.. they organize meetings, press books and magazines that they try to proove darwin was wrong..  >:( >:( >:( >:(
 
and lots of idiots prefer to believe and follow them :( :(  I suspect there are some arab sheikhs behind the scenes who pay them >:(
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 27 April 2013, 19:40:34
Had to smile at the withdrawal of packets of monkey nuts because they weren't labelled as peanuts.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165)

Bleach labelled "not for drinking".

3 out of 10 teenagers didn't know who Renoir was. Some even thought he was a footballer with Paris St Germain. ;D ;D ;D

Are we breeding common sense and knowledge out of people? They have after all got a hand held device that they can look up anything on if in doubt!

 ;D ;D ;D
 
 
now an info for you, here there are some religous groups that are also paid to proove darwinism was wrong.. they organize meetings, press books and magazines that they try to proove darwin was wrong..  >:( >:( >:( >:(
 
and lots of idiots prefer to believe and follow them :( :(  I suspect there are some arab sheikhs behind the scenes who pay them >:(

But remember Cem that in the USA at least 45% of the population do not believe Darwin was right, and instead believe God created the World over the last 10,000 years ::) ::) ::) ;)
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 27 April 2013, 20:30:32
Had to smile at the withdrawal of packets of monkey nuts because they weren't labelled as peanuts.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165)

Bleach labelled "not for drinking".

3 out of 10 teenagers didn't know who Renoir was. Some even thought he was a footballer with Paris St Germain. ;D ;D ;D

Are we breeding common sense and knowledge out of people? They have after all got a hand held device that they can look up anything on if in doubt!

 ;D ;D ;D
 
 
now an info for you, here there are some religous groups that are also paid to proove darwinism was wrong.. they organize meetings, press books and magazines that they try to proove darwin was wrong..  >:( >:( >:( >:(
 
and lots of idiots prefer to believe and follow them :( :(  I suspect there are some arab sheikhs behind the scenes who pay them >:(

But remember Cem that in the USA at least 45% of the population do not believe Darwin was right, and instead believe God created the World over the last 10,000 years ::) ::) ::) ;)

 ::)  yeah.. according to religion books he created the earth in 6 days ( or 7 for some books)..  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: paul.lovejoy on 27 April 2013, 21:10:51
Had to smile at the withdrawal of packets of monkey nuts because they weren't labelled as peanuts.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165)

Bleach labelled "not for drinking".

3 out of 10 teenagers didn't know who Renoir was. Some even thought he was a footballer with Paris St Germain. ;D ;D ;D

Are we breeding common sense and knowledge out of people? They have after all got a hand held device that they can look up anything on if in doubt!

 ;D ;D ;D
 
 
now an info for you, here there are some religous groups that are also paid to proove darwinism was wrong.. they organize meetings, press books and magazines that they try to proove darwin was wrong..  >:( >:( >:( >:(
 
and lots of idiots prefer to believe and follow them :( :(  I suspect there are some arab sheikhs behind the scenes who pay them >:(

But remember Cem that in the USA at least 45% of the population do not believe Darwin was right, and instead believe God created the World over the last 10,000 years ::) ::) ::) ;)

 ::)  yeah.. according to religion books he created the earth in 6 days ( or 7 for some books)..  ;D ;D



but in those days there were no CDM, Building regulations or Local Authorities now it takes 7 months just to build a house  :) :) those were the days :y ;D
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: cleggy on 27 April 2013, 22:26:26
I think it would be fair to say you can have knowledge without needing a Mensa IQ.

The point is that the gaps in peoples knowledge are due (in my opinion) to laziness. Being spoon fed rather than discovering. How many people read or do practical stuff?

But Varche, as I said before:
"As for gaps in knowledge, that is not unusual and has been the case ever since humans started to walk the Earth.  Unless you study, or are really interested in a subject, names of artists as in this case will not be known.  But, I bet,  the same youngsters will know far more about computers and their programmes than I will ever know!"

In other words, it is not somebody being lazy to have gaps in their knowledge, but rather more a case of their true needs in life.  A computer expert, police officer, or social worker will each have their specialist areas in which they gain knowledge because they need it professionally.  A mother with  six kids will require different knowledge and skills to keep her family safe and secure.  How many of them will know the link between Thomas Hobbes, Galileo, Bacon, Mersenne, and Gassendi?  I do because I have studied that period of history, but I don't expect most people in the street to know.  Why should they?  As I know about the sinking of HMS Hood, or the Battle of Trafalgar, and it's implications, along with the thoughts of Field Marshall Erwin Rommel on Hitler; then there is the development of the railways, etc, etc, etc.  But again I know nothing about computer workings and so much more because I never had to, as all I had to know was how to run a £ multi-million business with 3,500 staff along with financial management, property management, security management, HR management, etc, etc. Would I know any of that if I had not needed to? No is the easy answer ;D ;D ;D ;)

How to fill in benefit forms ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 27 April 2013, 22:34:04
I think before making benefit laws for people with many kids,  the community must teach the individuals how to plan their future for their families .. :(  and one must remind them , human kind is not rabbit and have numerous needs.. :(
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 27 April 2013, 22:39:54
and the politicans must tell the community that all disasters we are having today are caused by uneducated , uncivilized hungry masses..
[sigh] :(  no chance really!
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 27 April 2013, 22:55:26
That's shame they withdrew those nuts.  It could have been a neat bit of natural selection....  ;)
Title: Re: Darwinism?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 28 April 2013, 13:23:23
I think it would be fair to say you can have knowledge without needing a Mensa IQ.

The point is that the gaps in peoples knowledge are due (in my opinion) to laziness. Being spoon fed rather than discovering. How many people read or do practical stuff?

But Varche, as I said before:
"As for gaps in knowledge, that is not unusual and has been the case ever since humans started to walk the Earth.  Unless you study, or are really interested in a subject, names of artists as in this case will not be known.  But, I bet,  the same youngsters will know far more about computers and their programmes than I will ever know!"

In other words, it is not somebody being lazy to have gaps in their knowledge, but rather more a case of their true needs in life.  A computer expert, police officer, or social worker will each have their specialist areas in which they gain knowledge because they need it professionally.  A mother with  six kids will require different knowledge and skills to keep her family safe and secure.  How many of them will know the link between Thomas Hobbes, Galileo, Bacon, Mersenne, and Gassendi?  I do because I have studied that period of history, but I don't expect most people in the street to know.  Why should they?  As I know about the sinking of HMS Hood, or the Battle of Trafalgar, and it's implications, along with the thoughts of Field Marshall Erwin Rommel on Hitler; then there is the development of the railways, etc, etc, etc.  But again I know nothing about computer workings and so much more because I never had to, as all I had to know was how to run a £ multi-million business with 3,500 staff along with financial management, property management, security management, HR management, etc, etc. Would I know any of that if I had not needed to? No is the easy answer ;D ;D ;D ;)

How to fill in benefit forms ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D

Now, now Cleggy! ::) ::)   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;) ;)