Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 21:47:36

Title: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 21:47:36
They did not deserve that. That fickin throwback Di Michelis is too slow and reminds me of a 1970's Italian defender.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Entwood on 18 February 2014, 21:49:55
Guess they lost then ......
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 18 February 2014, 21:52:22
Who?
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 21:52:52
Guess they lost then ......
2-0 Nige, a Messi penalty after gorilla man brought him down and was sent off and a last-gasper in the 91st minute. City were never out of it, even with ten men.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 21:54:00
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 18 February 2014, 21:55:59
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: TheBoy on 18 February 2014, 21:56:51
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
As opposed to the team that can't win without one of the officials playing for them, as this season clearly proves ::)
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 21:57:58
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
Yes, as opposed to a team who can't win without American debt. In fact, there are no good teams without foreign investment. ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: TheBoy on 18 February 2014, 21:59:28
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
Yes, as opposed to a team who can't win without American debt. In fact, there are no good teams without foreign investment. ;D
It pains me to say it, as they play in red, but don't the Arse have their finances pretty much under control?
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 22:00:40
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
Yes, as opposed to a team who can't win without American debt. In fact, there are no good teams without foreign investment. ;D
It pains me to say it, as they play in red, but don't the Arse have their finances pretty much under control?
Yes, Russian finances.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 22:02:02
Liverpool, American....... Chelski, Russian.........
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 18 February 2014, 22:04:04
Gixer is thinking.............dangerous...
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Paddy Flannery on 18 February 2014, 22:15:43
City were put in their place tonight. Barca didn't need to get out of 2nd gear.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 18 February 2014, 22:35:55
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
As opposed to the team that can't win without one of the officials playing for them, as this season clearly proves ::)

I'll give you, without a certain Scottish manager.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 18 February 2014, 23:07:18
So I guess, by return favour from a few years ago, there will be Barca flags in the crowd at the next Utd game. ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: SteveAvfc. on 19 February 2014, 04:27:58
Ah the joys of not competing in the money financial debt league.

We won it once  you know and when we did we were at least champions of our own domestic league.  :y
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 19 February 2014, 09:42:34
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
or do you mean the team who cant do without yank money lol ;D ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 19 February 2014, 09:43:13
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
As opposed to the team that can't win without one of the officials playing for them, as this season clearly proves ::)
well said  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 19 February 2014, 11:30:11
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
As opposed to the team that can't win without one of the officials playing for them, as this season clearly proves ::)
well said  ;D ;D

Haven't you got A Tan recently Dolf...? A Malaysian Tan? ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 19 February 2014, 18:02:32
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
As opposed to the team that can't win without one of the officials playing for them, as this season clearly proves ::)
well said  ;D ;D

Haven't you got A Tan recently Dolf...? A Malaysian Tan? ;D
no dont need one .he is crap like moyes  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 19 February 2014, 18:05:00
who just paid all that money to a fat useless player ;D ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 19 February 2014, 18:05:52
Who?
The main team in a place called Manchester, well above their lesser rivals in the premiership.

Is that the team that can't win without Arabian money...?
As opposed to the team that can't win without one of the officials playing for them, as this season clearly proves ::)
well said  ;D ;D

Haven't you got A Tan recently Dolf...? A Malaysian Tan? ;D
no dont need one .he is crap like moyes  ;D ;D
How much money has he put in? ::) 50p? ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 19 February 2014, 18:31:01
All joking aside, £300,000 a week is obscene. I won't even try to work out how many years it would take my wife to earn what Rooney earns in a week.
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 19 February 2014, 18:35:00
All joking aside, £300,000 a week is obscene. I won't even try to work out how many years it would take my wife to earn what Rooney earns in a week.
its rubbing it in to the fans who pay his wages  >:(
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: Stemo on 19 February 2014, 19:41:12
All joking aside, £300,000 a week is obscene. I won't even try to work out how many years it would take my wife to earn what Rooney earns in a week.
its rubbing it in to the fans who pay his wages  >:(
And sky and BT subscribers, don't miss your chance. ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 19 February 2014, 21:03:07
All joking aside, £300,000 a week is obscene. I won't even try to work out how many years it would take my wife to earn what Rooney earns in a week.
its rubbing it in to the fans who pay his wages  >:(
And sky and BT subscribers, don't miss your chance. ;D
;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Man City
Post by: chrisgixer on 19 February 2014, 21:06:20
All joking aside, £300,000 a week is obscene. I won't even try to work out how many years it would take my wife to earn what Rooney earns in a week.
its rubbing it in to the fans who pay his wages  >:(
And sky and BT subscribers, don't miss your chance. ;D

....are you oppsing real ? ;D