Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Mr.OmegaMan on 24 February 2014, 22:27:09

Title: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: Mr.OmegaMan on 24 February 2014, 22:27:09
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2014/02/24/galaxy-s5-vs-galaxy-s4-spec-shootout/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/samsung/10657808/Samsung-Galaxy-S5-Fit-and-Gear-hands-on-review.html

5.1" Display  :o
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: Mr.OmegaMan on 24 February 2014, 22:28:37
Manufacturer's specifications:
5.1" screen Full HD Super Amoled
Android 4.4
Quad Krait 2.5GHz processor
16MP camera
142x72.5x8.1mm
145g
USB 3 charging
Dustproof and waterproof: IP67
2800mAh battery
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: Mr.OmegaMan on 24 February 2014, 22:30:42
(http://www.technobuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Galaxy-S5-Press-Image-81-1280x1304.jpg)

Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: 78bex on 24 February 2014, 23:01:09
Manufacturer's specifications:
5.1" screen Full HD Super Amoled
Android 4.4
Quad Krait 2.5GHz processor
16MP camera
142x72.5x8.1mm
145g
USB 3 charging
Dustproof and waterproof: IP67
2800mAh battery

Does all this mean I can shake off the ppl trying to contact me quicker ??? if so I`m in :y 
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: AndyRoid on 25 February 2014, 07:48:58
5.1" Display  :o
Virtually no difference from the S4 at 5", I am liking that IP67 rating though.
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: Ever Ready on 25 February 2014, 07:50:21
Who will be the first to test the IP67 rating? ;D
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: AndyRoid on 25 February 2014, 08:41:54
Who will be the first to test the IP67 rating? ;D
If it can't stand being submersed at a depth of no more than one metre for a short (generally < 30 mins) time then it isn't as described and they would have to replace it anyway  ;)
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: chrisgixer on 25 February 2014, 10:54:54
Nice yoghurt pot. Might have to try one of them. :)
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: tunnie on 25 February 2014, 12:04:02
Samsung kicking out the devices at the moment, we have one of these in the office. It makes the full size iPad look small!

http://www.johnlewis.com/samsung-galaxy-notepro-tablet-octa-core-samsung-exynos-android-12-2-32gb-wi-fi/p1141099 (http://www.johnlewis.com/samsung-galaxy-notepro-tablet-octa-core-samsung-exynos-android-12-2-32gb-wi-fi/p1141099)
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: Gaffers on 25 February 2014, 12:05:50
Samsung kicking out the devices at the moment, we have one of these in the office. It makes the full size iPad look small!

break me that's huge.  Why not just buy a laptop at that size/price?
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: tunnie on 25 February 2014, 12:10:36
It is rather massive, it's like you have one of those old A4 files at school to hold.

That said, it's not the biggest errr 'tablet' I have  ::)

(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/803897/Misc/2014-02-06%2009.57.50.jpg)
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: AndyRoid on 25 February 2014, 15:58:56
break me that's huge.  Why not just buy a laptop at that size/price?
Is there a laptop at that size/spec that weighs 750 grams and can offer the same battery life?
Title: Re: Samsung Galaxy S5
Post by: Miggylover on 27 February 2014, 13:53:47
Who will be the first to test the IP67 rating? ;D
If it can't stand being submersed at a depth of no more than one metre for a short (generally < 30 mins) time then it isn't as described and they would have to replace it anyway  ;)

How could you prove how deep of water,or how long it was submersed for ? Surely everyone who has to take their phone back will just claim it was in these parameters