Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: omega3000 on 21 May 2014, 17:26:58

Title: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: omega3000 on 21 May 2014, 17:26:58
Very tempting for someone LOTUS (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1992-Vauxhall-Carlton-by-Lotus-/161313034318?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item258f01904e)

Where's that piggy bank  ::)
Title: Re: Cheap Lotus C
Post by: RobG on 21 May 2014, 17:29:07
Quote
Offered at auction please be aware price is guide only
Quote
For sale by auction on Saturday 07 June 2014 with Historics at Brooklands,
Title: Re: Cheap Lotus C
Post by: aaronjb on 21 May 2014, 17:30:17
Had to read the whole advert before I found that - I though £7,500 sounded suspiciously cheap! I kept looking for the words "Cat C" or similar.. ;D
Title: Re: Cheap Lotus C
Post by: omega3000 on 21 May 2014, 17:30:49
Quote
Offered at auction please be aware price is guide only

That guide is high enough  :D ;D

Ah auction , £10k tops then  :P Did you want the engine for you project Aaron ..
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 21 May 2014, 18:34:25
Go for it, Mr Emd. :y
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: omega3000 on 21 May 2014, 19:00:20
Go for it, Mr Emd. :y

No chance Mr Opti , im living in a £10 tent now  :'(
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 21 May 2014, 19:30:29
Go for it, Mr Emd. :y

No chance Mr Opti , im living in a £10 tent now  :'(

In that case you should have enough spare money to finance the LC. :y ;D ;D
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: Keith ABS on 21 May 2014, 20:29:09
  Who was it on here that was seriously thinking about getting one of these?
Keith B
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: 05omegav6 on 21 May 2014, 20:30:16
RobseyMV6 iirc :y
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: dbug on 22 May 2014, 23:01:29
Thats a cheap price for a Lotus Carlton (assuming its not a shed of course)
Title: Re: Not so Cheap Lotus C
Post by: tooleater on 23 May 2014, 09:43:00
114,000 miles  :o paintwork average condition, if you ve spent £39k looking after one of those Beauties, surely it should read Immaculate. Beauty is skin deep but Ugly goes to the Bone :-X