Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: STEMO on 18 November 2020, 21:05:06
-
Don't read if you're easily upset
https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/paedophile-richard-huckle-stabbed-prisoner-4714010
-
Got what he deserved in my book, nonces are despised in prison.
-
Got what he deserved in my book, nonces are despised in prison.
I knew you'd be the first to reply and I knew what your reply would be ;D
There's nonces and there's nonces, that thing was a particularly nasty example.
-
Pity that type can’t be simply terminated instead of being fed and watered.
-
Got what he deserved in my book, nonces are despised in prison.
I knew you'd be the first to reply and I knew what your reply would be ;D
There's nonces and there's nonces, that thing was a particularly nasty example.
.
You know me so well Steve.
-
He should get a life sentence and a medal!
A life sentence because he's clearly a psychopath who should never walk the streets again and a medal for ridding the world of such scum. :y
-
He should get a life sentence and a medal!
A life sentence because he's clearly a psychopath who should never walk the streets again and a medal for ridding the world of such scum. :y
.
He will be looked after by the seg staff without a doubt.
-
Costs over £40k a year for every prisoner -
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/prison-performance-statistics-2018-to-2019
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Bleeding heart social worker :y
-
Moi? ::) ;D
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Liberals like you are the problem in this country >:(
;D
I'd shoot on first (real) offence.
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Liberals like you are the problem in this country >:(
;D
I'd shoot on first (real) offence.
For the most part I agree, but you have to at least seem reasonable ;)
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Liberals like you are the problem in this country >:(
;D
I'd shoot on first (real) offence.
For the most part I agree, but you have to at least seem reasonable ;)
Nope, thats why we tolerate idiots. I am reasonable, do the crime = get shot. A simple message.
Hug trees = get shot. Drive below the speed limit = shot.
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Liberals like you are the problem in this country >:(
;D
I'd shoot on first (real) offence.
For the most part I agree, but you have to at least seem reasonable ;)
Nope, thats why we tolerate idiots. I am reasonable, do the crime = get shot. A simple message.
Hug trees = get shot. Drive below the speed limit = shot.
Surely we could solve all these problems by simply giving everybody a fluffy kitten. :)
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Liberals like you are the problem in this country >:(
;D
I'd shoot on first (real) offence.
For the most part I agree, but you have to at least seem reasonable ;)
Nope, thats why we tolerate idiots. I am reasonable, do the crime = get shot. A simple message.
Hug trees = get shot. Drive below the speed limit = shot.
I think we might have slightly different ideas of reasonable ;D
-
Shoot them on the third conviction.
General traffic offences would be fines/temporary bans except for death related items and drink/drug driving. See above for that.
And to keep the salad munchers happy, anyone with 'issues' gets offered support for the first two convictions.
Oh, and don't publicise the final sentence. Just do it and move on.
Liberals like you are the problem in this country >:(
;D
I'd shoot on first (real) offence.
For the most part I agree, but you have to at least seem reasonable ;)
Nope, thats why we tolerate idiots. I am reasonable, do the crime = get shot. A simple message.
Hug trees = get shot. Drive below the speed limit = shot.
Surely we could solve all these problems by simply giving everybody a fluffy kitten. :)
Nice try, but what about those allergic to pussies? ::)