Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Varche on 21 November 2025, 15:37:44

Title: Nathan Gill
Post by: Varche on 21 November 2025, 15:37:44
Nathan Gill, 52, pleaded guilty earlier this year to eight counts of bribery between December 2018 and July 2019.

Prosecutors said Gill, a former member of the European Union legislature who also led the Reform UK party in Wales, was tasked by former Ukrainian politician Oleg Voloshyn, an alleged Russian asset, to make statements in return for money.

 :o
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 21 November 2025, 15:53:05
Should restore the death penalty for high treason.
Could hang him then.
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 21 November 2025, 16:27:51
Should restore the death penalty for high treason.
Could hang him then.

Blair repealed that so we couldn't hang him.  ::)
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 22 November 2025, 08:02:03
Yes, very unfortunate too.  :(
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: TheBoy on 22 November 2025, 13:58:41
Should restore the death penalty for high treason.
Could hang him then.

Blair repealed that so we couldn't hang him.  ::)
But for all his faults, did he ever commit treason?

Misplace loyalties, yes. Gullible, yes.  Treason though?


Lets face it, he's probably the best Labour PM we've had this millennium ;D
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: ronnyd on 22 November 2025, 14:11:41
Should restore the death penalty for high treason.
Could hang him then.

Blair repealed that so we couldn't hang him.  ::)
But for all his faults, did he ever commit treason?

Misplace loyalties, yes. Gullible, yes.  Treason though?


Lets face it, he's probably the best Labour PM we've had this millennium ;D

That's quite a low bar to be fair.  ;D
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 22 November 2025, 14:56:03
Blairs Human Rights Act, is the cause of most of the problems we currently have.
He deliberately opened the floodgates to uncontrolled mass immigration.
He put Brown in the Treasury who caused damage to the economy that will probably never be repaired.
He is responsible for the deaths and maiming of countless people, including many British service personnel.
Did he commit treason ?  A resounding yes from me.
The worst PM in my lifetime. I hate him with a passion.
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: TheBoy on 22 November 2025, 17:07:06
None of those are acts of treason....
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 22 November 2025, 21:34:47
Should restore the death penalty for high treason.
Could hang him then.

Blair repealed that so we couldn't hang him.  ::)
But for all his faults, did he ever commit treason?

Misplace loyalties, yes. Gullible, yes.  Treason though?


Lets face it, he's probably the best Labour PM we've had this millennium ;D
He categorically sold out our troops and by default our security, to suit his own ends.

I think that qualifies.
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Raeturbo on 22 November 2025, 22:51:47
 He was, is, and always will be an obnoxious horrible k haunt
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: TheBoy on 23 November 2025, 11:12:05
He categorically sold out our troops and by default our security, to suit his own ends.

I think that qualifies.
I very much doubt it would if it was tested in law.... ;)
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: TheBoy on 23 November 2025, 11:12:28
He was, is, and always will be an obnoxious horrible k haunt
That, I can't argue with  :y
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 24 November 2025, 07:01:25
He categorically sold out our troops and by default our security, to suit his own ends.

I think that qualifies.
I very much doubt it would if it was tested in law.... ;)
Unfortunately his wife and our current retarded excuse of a PM wrote said law :-X
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Varche on 24 November 2025, 14:55:55
A lot of obfuscation.

What about it showing badly on the beloved Reform and Farage? How many other Putin lovers are there?
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 24 November 2025, 17:19:00
https://gawaintowler.substack.com/p/the-deep-betrayal-of-nathan-gill
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: redelitev6 on 24 November 2025, 23:02:12
Sadly Reform does seem to attract some "odd" characters , this isn't going to do them any favours
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 25 November 2025, 12:05:17
I dont think it will do too much harm tbh.
Similar to the desperate MSM trying to drag up racist remarks from Farage when he was a schoolboy.
Many people are totally disillusioned with Labour / Tories lies, incompetence and taking the electorate for granted, they are going to give Reform a chance, and hope they will do better.
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: STEMO on 25 November 2025, 12:10:39
My Mrs took great joy in this report. 'Ha!' she said 'I told you Nigel Farage was a racist'.
'I know' I said 'why else do you think I'm going to vote for him?'
Title: Re: Nathan Gill
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 25 November 2025, 12:51:59
My Mrs took great joy in this report. 'Ha!' she said 'I told you Nigel Farage was a racist'.
'I know' I said 'why else do you think I'm going to vote for him?'
;D

Racism, xenophobia and patriotism are three very different things, however late to the bandwagon people are...

As to comments made by a child, as a toddler, I distinctly remember asking Mum why a man was covered in chocolate :-[  for context that was on Guildford High Street in the late 70s. It doesn't make me a racist, just an inquisitive 3 year old who asked a reasonable (for a 3 year old) question about something that had never been seen before.

Anti illegal immigration is not a bad stance to have. Most people in that category aren't leaving their origins for a better life, they're coming to make ours worse. Got dropped off at Geneva airport tother day to be greeted by a woman in a hijab allowing her child to drop his kecks and shit on the floor by the terminal entrance because that's apparently what we do in a civilised country with plumbing. Point is it's not just a UK problem however mainstream media try and spin it.

Incidentally given that Nathan Gill is a Mormon, one could reasonably question his overall motives... It's only his involvement in government that makes it potentially treasonous. Although cash for questions is far from a new concept.