Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Mr Skrunts on 02 September 2009, 10:41:44

Title: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 02 September 2009, 10:41:44


Come on guys, which setting would you choose.  Size and firmness?   ::)


http://www.shockabsorbersport.co.nz/wawcs0141481/bounce-o-meter.html
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 02 September 2009, 10:42:46
Wonder who will reply 1st



























JimBob or cem?   ;D ;D
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: mantagte on 02 September 2009, 10:47:37
size dd
running
no bra
 :) :) :) :) :y
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Jimbob on 02 September 2009, 10:53:38
Im at work, so not me...


did have a good play on it last time it was here though, a great site  :y
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Ghost on 02 September 2009, 11:09:57
You dirty old man [smiley=evil.gif] [smiley=evil.gif] [smiley=evil.gif]
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 02 September 2009, 11:12:10
Quote
Im at work, so not me...


did have a good play on it last time it was here though, a great site  :y


I know there has been a similar one on, my appologies if it is the same site.
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 02 September 2009, 12:05:45
now arrived from lunch break  ;D

but if I was here, Sure I would be #1 ;D :y

size D is ok.. ;D
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: KillerWatt on 02 September 2009, 12:18:46
That simulator didn't have the old lady's cup size, but I can say from personal experience that a sports bra doesn't keep a pair of GG's under control in competition  ;D
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: STMO999 on 02 September 2009, 13:09:02
Quote
That simulator didn't have the old lady's cup size, but I can say from personal experience that a sports bra doesn't keep a pair of GG's under control in competition  ;D

She has horses instead of breasts? :-/
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 02 September 2009, 13:16:22
Quote
Quote
That simulator didn't have the old lady's cup size, but I can say from personal experience that a sports bra doesn't keep a pair of GG's under control in competition  ;D

She has horses instead of breasts? :-/


 ;D ;D outstanding  :y :y
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Tonka. on 02 September 2009, 13:35:19
I will continue this research later  :y :y

When SWTSMBO has gone to work
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: KillerWatt on 02 September 2009, 20:30:05
Quote
Quote
That simulator didn't have the old lady's cup size, but I can say from personal experience that a sports bra doesn't keep a pair of GG's under control in competition  ;D

She has horses instead of breasts? :-/
Why would any normal man want to reduce the chance of emptying their sack by 33.33% (recurring) ?
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Elite Pete on 02 September 2009, 20:31:24
Quote
Quote
That simulator didn't have the old lady's cup size, but I can say from personal experience that a sports bra doesn't keep a pair of GG's under control in competition  ;D

She has horses instead of breasts? :-/
Brilliant ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: LJay on 03 September 2009, 00:15:12
Quote
Im at work, so not me...


did have a good play on it last time it was here though, a great site  :y

Jimbob did extensive research recently into 'industrial strength scaffolding' which he enjoyed very much!!! ;) ;D
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: HolyCount on 05 September 2009, 22:17:11
Well .... I must admit, I like the fried eggs too  ::)

Can't help it -- all shapes and sizes welcome  :y
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 05 September 2009, 23:35:18
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 05 September 2009, 23:38:18
Quote
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y

Fine if you have small hands.   ::)
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 06 September 2009, 01:12:48
Quote
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y



I suppose it would have been easier to say that I'm a sucker for small breasts ::) ::) ;D ;D ( female kind )
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 06 September 2009, 01:15:39
Quote
Quote
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y



I suppose it would have been easier to say that I'm a sucker for small breasts ::) ::) ;D ;D ( female kind )

They make suckers out of all us men.  Seems we never lose the habbit from the day w were born, we just do it now for different reasons   ::)
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 06 September 2009, 01:20:19
Quote
Quote
Quote
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y



I suppose it would have been easier to say that I'm a sucker for small breasts ::) ::) ;D ;D ( female kind )

They make suckers out of all us men.  Seems we never lose the habbit from the day w were born, we just do it now for different reasons   ::)


Isn't that the truth ;D :y :y
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: V6 Gix on 06 September 2009, 16:06:53
God bless the internet.......
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: LJay on 06 September 2009, 16:45:24
Quote
Quote
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y

Fine if you have small hands.   ::)

More than a hand full is greedy!!!!! ;) ;)
Title: Re: Shock Absorber Problems (N.W.S)
Post by: Jimbob on 06 September 2009, 16:47:01
Quote
Quote
Quote
I rather think a size 32 B is more than satisfactory 8-) 8-) :y

Fine if you have small hands.   ::)

More than a hand full is greedy!!!!! ;) ;)


Now who is that in my avatar again  ::) ::) ::)  ;D ;D ;D