Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 13:12:22

Title: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 13:12:22
Can you guess which of the following are true and which are false?

(Answers are below)

1. Apples, not caffeine, are more efficient at waking you up in the morning.

2. Alfred Hitchcock didn't have a belly button.

3. A pack-a-day smoker will lose approximately two teeth every ten years.

4. People do not get sick from cold weather; it's from being indoors a lot more.

5. When you sneeze, all bodily functions stop, even your heart!

6. Only 7% of the population are lefties.

7. Forty people are sent to the hospital for dog bites every minute.

8. Babies are born without kneecaps. They don't appear until they are two - six years old.

9. The average person over 50 will have spent five years waiting in lines.

10. The toothbrush was invented in 1498.

11. The average housefly lives for one month.

12. 40,000 Americans are injured by toilets each year.

13 . A coat hanger is 44 inches long when straightened.

14. The average computer user blinks seven times a minute.

15. Your feet are bigger in the afternoon than any other time of day.

16. Most of us have eaten a spider in our sleep.

17. The real reason ostriches stick their head in the sand is to search for water.

18. The only two animals that can see behind themselves without turning their heads are the rabbit and the parrot.

19. John Travolta turned down the starring roles in 'An Officer and a Gentleman' and 'Tootsie.'

20. Michael Jackson owns the rights to the South Carolina State Anthem.

21. In most television commercials advertising milk, a mixture of white paint and a little thinner is used in place of the milk.

22. Prince Charles and Prince William never travel on the same airplane, just in case there is a crash.

23. The first Harley Davidson motorcycle built in 1903 used a tomato can for a carburettor.

24. Most hospitals make money by selling the umbilical cords cut from women who give birth. They are used in vein transplant surgery.

25. Humphrey Bogart was related to Princess Diana. They were seventh cousins.

26. If colouring weren't added to Coca-Cola, it would be green.

Now, scroll down for the answers...
































They are all true...



Now go back and think about No. 16!


[size=8]Yaaay -- I'm related to Humphrey Bogart !!!![/size]
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Banjax on 08 September 2009, 13:36:34
good stuff - i'm dubious about a few of them tho - no 5 & 21 and you being related to Bogie  :y
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: mantahatch on 08 September 2009, 13:51:46
Some interesting ones there, I do dispute the amount of left handers though, as this number is increasing now we are not caning children anymore for writing with there left hand.
And yes my father still has the scars to prove it.
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 14:03:24
Quote
good stuff - i'm dubious about a few of them tho - no 5 & 21 and you being related to Bogie  :y

Heh heh ... yes, there are a few dubious ones there. As for being related to Bogie -- if he indeed is related to Diana, then I am related to him  ;)  One relation I know I am linked with is Sir Lawrence Olivier (distant cousin)  :y
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Banjax on 08 September 2009, 14:26:00
Quote
Quote
good stuff - i'm dubious about a few of them tho - no 5 & 21 and you being related to Bogie  :y

Heh heh ... yes, there are a few dubious ones there. As for being related to Bogie -- if he indeed is related to Diana, then I am related to him  ;)  One relation I know I am linked with is Sir Lawrence Olivier (distant cousin)  :y

name dropper  8-)
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 14:35:53
Quote
Quote
Quote
good stuff - i'm dubious about a few of them tho - no 5 & 21 and you being related to Bogie  :y

Heh heh ... yes, there are a few dubious ones there. As for being related to Bogie -- if he indeed is related to Diana, then I am related to him  ;)  One relation I know I am linked with is Sir Lawrence Olivier (distant cousin)  :y

name dropper  8-)

 ;D ;D ;D ::)
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: BigAl on 08 September 2009, 16:36:13
I think you'll find that number 20 is no longer true ...
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 19:45:04
Quote
I think you'll find that number 20 is no longer true ...

.... that will be the estate of Mr Jackson
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 08 September 2009, 19:49:06
What happened to Hitchcock's navel then HC? - seems very odd, how was he attached? :-/ :-/
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: MikeDundee on 08 September 2009, 19:58:38
Interestingly and funnily enough, A forum member had an arachnophobic experience this afternoon whilst in an omega with a so called Massive spider  ;D, thankfully he was'nt driving and was able to take a picture on his phone, no doubt we will see later how massive this spider actually was ::) ........apparantley as big as his arm :-X ;D
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Turk on 08 September 2009, 19:59:44
I can't see my daily Espresso being replaced by an apple any day soon.    
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Plomien on 08 September 2009, 20:14:53
Quote
22. Prince Charles and Prince William never travel on the same airplane, just in case there is a crash.
what happens if they crash into each other :o :o :D ;D
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 21:20:37
Quote
What happened to Hitchcock's navel then HC? - seems very odd, how was he attached? :-/ :-/

Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: waspy on 08 September 2009, 21:28:20
Quote
Quote
What happened to Hitchcock's navel then HC? - seems very odd, how was he attached? :-/ :-/

Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)


My Dad doesn't have one, due to an opperation as a toddler
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: BigAl on 08 September 2009, 21:30:56
Quote
Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)

Is that not a Mexican dish ?
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 21:42:50
Quote
Quote
Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)

Is that not a Mexican dish ?

Well I thought it was a snail -- but apparently its an anteater  ::)
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 08 September 2009, 21:57:51
Quote
Quote
What happened to Hitchcock's navel then HC? - seems very odd, how was he attached? :-/ :-/

Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)



How do you know all this stuff HC?


The main disadvantave that I can see with such an absence is, where would all the fluff accumulate? :-/ :-/ ;D
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 22:04:49
Quote
Quote
Quote
What happened to Hitchcock's navel then HC? - seems very odd, how was he attached? :-/ :-/

Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)



How do you know all this stuff HC?


The main disadvantave that I can see with such an absence is, where would all the fluff accumulate? :-/ :-/ ;D

Ah -- now, the obvious alternative would be the little dimple at the base of the spine ..... you know the one!?

The burning question, slightly off the topic, is why is this fluff always blue !?
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 08 September 2009, 22:23:18
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
What happened to Hitchcock's navel then HC? - seems very odd, how was he attached? :-/ :-/

Hitchcock, like everyone else, was born with a navel. Supposedly, he had a small section of his belly that contained the navel removed during some sort of surgery. This, I gather, is not that uncommon.

Apparently ...All mammals except platypusses (platypi?) and echidnas have a belly-button equivalent, where their umbilical cords were attached to their placentas - with cats and dogs and such, it just looks like a flat scar. In humans, it's attached by ligaments to the abdominal wall muscle and surrounded by fat so it makes a noticeable dimple. Unless lopped off by an enthusiastic surgeon  ::)



How do you know all this stuff HC?


The main disadvantave that I can see with such an absence is, where would all the fluff accumulate? :-/ :-/ ;D

Ah -- now, the obvious alternative would be the little dimple at the base of the spine ..... you know the one!?

The burning question, slightly off the topic, is why is this fluff always blue !?


...that may well be beyond our ken HC :y
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: gsdtrainer on 08 September 2009, 22:49:42
No.7,don't you think those 40 people would have the sense to stay away from dogs :-?
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 22:56:08
No 12 -- what are they doing ?
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Martin_1962 on 08 September 2009, 22:56:21
16 is also false
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Stevie-blunder on 08 September 2009, 22:59:43
No. 11 is not true in my house.... the spiders eat them all...... then No. 16  :( :(
 :y
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 23:06:44
Quote
No. 11 is not true in my house.... the spiders eat them all...... then No. 16  :( :(
 :y

Once the adult house fly hatches from the pupal stage, it has an approximate life span of 15 to 30 days. Females are able to start producing eggs after two days of life and will continue to lay eggs for about a month. Female house flys are usually larger than the males. Tell the spiders to leave them alone ... or be eaten themselves !!!!
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 08 September 2009, 23:07:59
Quote
Quote
No. 11 is not true in my house.... the spiders eat them all...... then No. 16  :( :(
 :y

Once the adult house fly hatches from the pupal stage, it has an approximate life span of 15 to 30 days. Females are able to start producing eggs after two days of life and will continue to lay eggs for about a month. Female house flys are usually larger than the males. Tell the spiders to leave them alone ... or be eaten themselves !!!!



How do you know these facts HC? ;D ;D :y
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: HolyCount on 08 September 2009, 23:12:03
Quote
16 is also false

On balance of probability I think you might be correct.
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: Martin_1962 on 08 September 2009, 23:21:08
Quote
Quote
16 is also false

On balance of probability I think you might be correct.


http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/spiders.asp
Title: Re: True or False ?
Post by: V6 Gix on 08 September 2009, 23:55:26
Ok, who read number 14......and then blinked?? ;D