Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: pscocoa on 17 June 2009, 20:08:47

Title: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 17 June 2009, 20:08:47
If I wanted to post a request for info about a particular company in relation to members knowledge of any employment disputes/tribunals etc involving that company and to ask them to PM me rather than put replies on open forum - would this be considered a legitimate use of the site? I am helping someone with an unfair selection for redundancy case.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: STMO123 on 17 June 2009, 20:17:51
I'm sure it would be a perfectly legitimate use of the site. But I wouldn't hold my breath... ;D ;D
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 17 June 2009, 20:36:35
Quote
I'm sure it would be a perfectly legitimate use of the site. But I wouldn't hold my breath... ;D ;D
Dunno whether it would be considered legitimate use of the site to be honest (I've repeated info that is freely available on the net and Admin have crapped themselves), but if you want help on disciplinary procedure then feel free to PM me.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: STMO123 on 17 June 2009, 21:12:35
Quote
Quote
I'm sure it would be a perfectly legitimate use of the site. But I wouldn't hold my breath... ;D ;D
Dunno whether it would be considered legitimate use of the site to be honest (I've repeated info that is freely available on the net and Admin have crapped themselves), but if you want help on disciplinary procedure then feel free to PM me.

No, you misunderstand. He wants legal advice, not Ms. Whiplash's address. ;D
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 17 June 2009, 21:17:09
i don't even need legal advice - I would just like to know if there are any other cases involving this company - or similar issues which point to their conduct. I might wait until admin comment
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: TheBoy on 17 June 2009, 22:20:49
Quote
Quote
I'm sure it would be a perfectly legitimate use of the site. But I wouldn't hold my breath... ;D ;D
Dunno whether it would be considered legitimate use of the site to be honest (I've repeated info that is freely available on the net and Admin have crapped themselves), but if you want help on disciplinary procedure then feel free to PM me.
You know thats different, thats discussion about illegal activity. And don't even begin to sprout the bullshit about it being civil, not criminal.

The rules posted in each section are quite simple. Whether or not you, me, A.N.Other agree with them, its one of the few simple rules of the site. I hope thats clear, as you do seem to use any opportunity to bring it up, and I find it tedious.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: TheBoy on 17 June 2009, 22:21:20
Quote
If I wanted to post a request for info about a particular company in relation to members knowledge of any employment disputes/tribunals etc involving that company and to ask them to PM me rather than put replies on open forum - would this be considered a legitimate use of the site? I am helping someone with an unfair selection for redundancy case.
If its legal, I see no issue.  If it becomes an issue, we may have to mod the thread
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 17 June 2009, 22:29:12
Quote
No, you misunderstand. He wants legal advice, not Ms. Whiplash's address. ;D
Been perving her have you? ;)


Quote
You know thats different, thats discussion about illegal activity. And don't even begin to sprout the bullshit about it being civil, not criminal.
There is no law (at this moment in time) against discussing activities that are illegal J, it only becomes a problem when you start providing the means to actually break the law or actively encourage others to do it (but then, you should already know that given how you make your living).

Telling people that the 360/Wii can be hacked doesn't mean s**t because the world and it's mother knows they can be hacked, providing others with the means may be a different ball game altogether though (but even that depends on the hack being used as to whether it's actually illegal or not).
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Gaffers on 17 June 2009, 22:35:37
Quote
Quote
No, you misunderstand. He wants legal advice, not Ms. Whiplash's address. ;D
Been perving her have you? ;)


Quote
You know thats different, thats discussion about illegal activity.

Legality aside there is the moral issue which many consider more important than established laws  :y
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 17 June 2009, 22:41:59
Quote
Legality aside there is the moral issue which many consider more important than established laws  :y
When our "cousins" on the other side of the pond get a game 3 months before us, and only pay $20, it's pretty much a forgone conclusion what my reaction will be when you try & charge me £40 after making me wait an extra 3 months for it in the UK ;)
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: TheBoy on 17 June 2009, 22:44:51
Quote
Quote
Legality aside there is the moral issue which many consider more important than established laws  :y
When our "cousins" on the other side of the pond get a game 3 months before us, and only pay $20, it's pretty much a forgone conclusion what my reaction will be when you try & charge me £40 after making me wait an extra 3 months for it in the UK ;)
We all know what your reaction will be, and we're not stopping you from doing that. But the rules of this forum are clear. End of discussion.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Gaffers on 17 June 2009, 22:48:23
Quote
Quote
Legality aside there is the moral issue which many consider more important than established laws  :y
When our "cousins" on the other side of the pond get a game 3 months before us, and only pay $20, it's pretty much a forgone conclusion what my reaction will be when you try & charge me £40 after making me wait an extra 3 months for it in the UK ;)

If you want stuff from over the pond mate let me know and the trolly-dolly missus can get it for you  :y
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Vamps on 17 June 2009, 22:52:00
Quote
Quote
Quote
Legality aside there is the moral issue which many consider more important than established laws  :y
When our "cousins" on the other side of the pond get a game 3 months before us, and only pay $20, it's pretty much a forgone conclusion what my reaction will be when you try & charge me £40 after making me wait an extra 3 months for it in the UK ;)

If you want stuff from over the pond mate let me know and the trolly-dolly missus can get it for you  :y

Can you not just buy it legally anyway? Internet or ebay :)
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 17 June 2009, 22:55:03
Quote
Can you not just buy it legally anyway? Internet or ebay :)
Yes you can mate, trouble is that certain manufacturers like to dictate just exactly what region games your machine can play....ergo, price fixing in my book.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: TheBoy on 17 June 2009, 22:56:58
Quote
Quote
Can you not just buy it legally anyway? Internet or ebay :)
Yes you can mate, trouble is that certain manufacturers like to dictate just exactly what region games your machine can play....ergo, price fixing in my book.
obviously, the legal way to boycot that is to not use the game/film/music/software
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 17 June 2009, 23:00:27
Quote
Quote
Quote
Can you not just buy it legally anyway? Internet or ebay :)
Yes you can mate, trouble is that certain manufacturers like to dictate just exactly what region games your machine can play....ergo, price fixing in my book.
obviously, the legal way to boycot that is to not use the game/film/music/software
Bang on, but you try telling a couple of kids (one with a moderate mental disability) that they can't have a 360/Wii/PS and see what happens.

The manufacturers have us by the gonads and they know it....so it's obvious what will happen, and then they have the front to complain about it.

If you're gonna push a dog in to a corner, then show it a way out otherwise it will bite your backside ;)
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 17 June 2009, 23:02:36
Ok - I am assisting someone with an Unfair Selection for Redundancy Case.

The company in question is N G Bailey
http://www.ngbailey.com

If anybody has any information or knows anyone who may have info that could be relevant then please PM me - please do not put anything on the open forum. The info I am looking for is similar employment issues in very broad terms - do we know of any disputes involving this company?
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: TheBoy on 17 June 2009, 23:03:33
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Can you not just buy it legally anyway? Internet or ebay :)
Yes you can mate, trouble is that certain manufacturers like to dictate just exactly what region games your machine can play....ergo, price fixing in my book.
obviously, the legal way to boycot that is to not use the game/film/music/software
Bang on, but you try telling a couple of kids (one with a moderate mental disability) that they can't have a 360/Wii/PS and see what happens.

The manufacturers have us by the gonads and they know it....so it's obvious what will happen, and then they have the front to complain about it.

If you're gonna push a dog in to a corner, then show it a way out otherwise it will bite your backside ;)
probably like yourself, i was brought up in a different era.  Not that we had the money, but even if we did, if I tried pester power on my parents, it would invariably hurt my ear/backside/back of my legs....
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 17 June 2009, 23:12:49
Quote
probably like yourself, i was brought up in a different era.  Not that we had the money, but even if we did, if I tried pester power on my parents, it would invariably hurt my ear/backside/back of my legs....
We are the same age (give or take a few months), so I know exactly what you mean (and you probably know exactly what I think of the world as well).

Thing is though, times have changed.
Don't get me wrong, I am staunch in that I tell my kids twice....and the third time they get the backhander.
Any do-gooder has a problem with that, then they can look after the kids when they become delinquents with no respect....but while the kids are in my care, they will learn the basics of life (respect your elders, don't f**k about with people, and treat others the way you wanna be treated yourself).

I know the way we were brought up didn't hurt us, but I think (sometimes) things could have been done slightly better IMO.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Auto Addict on 18 June 2009, 06:15:27
Quote
Ok - I am assisting someone with an Unfair Selection for Redundancy Case.

The company in question is N G Bailey
http://www.ngbailey.com

If anybody has any information or knows anyone who may have info that could be relevant then please PM me - please do not put anything on the open forum. The info I am looking for is similar employment issues in very broad terms - do we know of any disputes involving this company?

ACAS just love anything like that.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Auto Addict on 18 June 2009, 06:23:45
Quote
Quote
probably like yourself, i was brought up in a different era.  Not that we had the money, but even if we did, if I tried pester power on my parents, it would invariably hurt my ear/backside/back of my legs....
We are the same age (give or take a few months), so I know exactly what you mean (and you probably know exactly what I think of the world as well).

Thing is though, times have changed.
Don't get me wrong, I am staunch in that I tell my kids twice....and the third time they get the backhander.
Any do-gooder has a problem with that, then they can look after the kids when they become delinquents with no respect....but while the kids are in my care, they will learn the basics of life (respect your elders, don't f**k about with people, and treat others the way you wanna be treated yourself).

I know the way we were brought up didn't hurt us, but I think (sometimes) things could have been done slightly better IMO.

Good on you, but it's a shame they probably won't be able to string two words together without using foul language :(
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: KillerWatt on 18 June 2009, 06:48:44
Quote
Good on you, but it's a shame they probably won't be able to string two words together without using foul language :(
The eldest has Tourette's anyway, and given my common use of words (always in context mind) that some consider to be "foul", it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if I was deemed to officially have it as well.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Dave-C on 18 June 2009, 07:12:56
Quote
Ok - I am assisting someone with an Unfair Selection for Redundancy Case.

The company in question is N G Bailey
http://www.ngbailey.com

If anybody has any information or knows anyone who may have info that could be relevant then please PM me - please do not put anything on the open forum. The info I am looking for is similar employment issues in very broad terms - do we know of any disputes involving this company?

I know nothing of the company, hence my two penneth on open forum!

Having had a quick looky at their website, they're quite a biggish company, is there a union involved with their business that your friend is a member of? if not, it may be worth approaching such a union, they will likely help.  Also, there will be the right to an appeals process, has there been an appeal, if not, why not.  Tell your friend to stand up for his rights (In the words of the great and late Bob Marley). Some companys achieve the outcome of their selection by filling out a sheet, which scores points for every eventuality covered, attendance, productivity communication skills (i.e. Has he pi55ed anyone off) and many, many more categories.  If the later, how has he faired in that?

The other angle from my point of view is, take the money and run, assuming it's a worthwhile sum that is.  Lets face it, it's redundancy not dismissal  ;)  That means he'll get another job with a glowing CV rather than a soiled one, if you get my drift :)

I personally took a voluntary redundancy in March, setting up alone, haven't looked back just yet!  But, the way that BT / Openreach are treating their staff, it's as well I've left, because I would have got the sack ;D ;D ;D  Strong views and opinions, me!!!

Good Luck to your friend :y

Keep us informed..

DC

Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 18 June 2009, 19:05:26
Not a union situation - it is a little complicated and revolves around how you apply the criteria that are set to decide who stays and who goes.

Will see how it develops
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Auto Addict on 19 June 2009, 05:44:39
Quote
Not a union situation - it is a little complicated and revolves around how you apply the criteria that are set to decide who stays and who goes.

Will see how it develops

Still worth contacting ACAS for an informal chat.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Dave-C on 19 June 2009, 05:55:00
Quote
Quote
Not a union situation - it is a little complicated and revolves around how you apply the criteria that are set to decide who stays and who goes.

Will see how it develops

Still worth contacting ACAS for an informal chat.

That's my point :y  Even legal advice on an insurance policy could be considered too...  ;)
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 19 June 2009, 15:40:01
Quote
Quote
Not a union situation - it is a little complicated and revolves around how you apply the criteria that are set to decide who stays and who goes.

Will see how it develops

Still worth contacting ACAS for an informal chat.
Spoke to ACAS who were not much help as it is complicated. They spent most of the time telling me how stressful Employment Tribunals can be - I didn't bother to tell then I had been there twice before helping other mates out. I will have to talk to a top brief on the fundamental legal point. If I get confidence on that then will press on.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 20 July 2009, 16:58:14
Just an update - which might help others - went through the home insurance policy and guess what? He is insured for legal expenses up to £100,000 and employment disputes is one of the insured categories. Sent off an outline of case and insurance have agreed to refer it to a solicitor at their expense. They might of course say that the case is not good but I feel better that we try rather than just give up on basis of uncertainty of whether the selection was unfair or not.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: STMO999 on 20 July 2009, 18:06:31
Good luck with that one.
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: elite_one on 20 July 2009, 21:52:48
Only way of taking it to a tribunal is if you can prove that the criteria was not carried out in accordance to the law ... VERY difficult to prove ... tried a couple of years ago ... without success ... good luck and keep us informed
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Turk on 20 July 2009, 23:05:52
Quote
Quote
probably like yourself, i was brought up in a different era.  Not that we had the money, but even if we did, if I tried pester power on my parents, it would invariably hurt my ear/backside/back of my legs....
We are the same age (give or take a few months), so I know exactly what you mean (and you probably know exactly what I think of the world as well).

Thing is though, times have changed.
Don't get me wrong, I am staunch in that I tell my kids twice....and the third time they get the backhander.
Any do-gooder has a problem with that, then they can look after the kids when they become delinquents with no respect....but while the kids are in my care, they will learn the basics of life (respect your elders, don't f**k about with people, and treat others the way you wanna be treated yourself).

I know the way we were brought up didn't hurt us, but I think (sometimes) things could have been done slightly better IMO.

Exactly  :y
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: pscocoa on 03 November 2009, 17:55:31
Update on this - after a couple of weeks after last post from me, the insurance company appointed solicitor said we did not have a 51% chance of winning so they were ont prepared to fund the proceedings. I contested this and after a battle the insurance comapny referred it to a barrister (at their expense) who confirmed that we have 55% chance of winning.

Today the papers were filed at the Employment Tribunal Service paid for by Insurance Company - we are 3 weeks inside time limit. Hopefully we will get a result on this now. At least for time being all expenses being picked up by insurance company.

Probably no further news for 6 weeks now. But you have to fight everything to get these insurance companies to meet your claims
Title: Re: Unfair selection for redundancy
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 03 November 2009, 18:30:35
Let hope that things go in your favour P :y :y

Good luck.