Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Richie London on 16 March 2010, 15:19:29

Title: is this bloke for real
Post by: Richie London on 16 March 2010, 15:19:29
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1258249/Company-boss-compares-troops-paedophiles-refusing-request-provide-jobs-soldiers.html?ITO=1708&referrer=yahoo
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Banjax on 16 March 2010, 15:27:23
Quote
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1258249/Company-boss-compares-troops-paedophiles-refusing-request-provide-jobs-soldiers.html?ITO=1708&referrer=yahoo

not the way the Mail portray it, but if you're interested in the full statement (which the Mail clearly isn't) it can be found here:

http://www.webeurope.co.uk/press-release.php
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Richie London on 16 March 2010, 15:48:42
Quote
Quote
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1258249/Company-boss-compares-troops-paedophiles-refusing-request-provide-jobs-soldiers.html?ITO=1708&referrer=yahoo

not the way the Mail portray it, but if you're interested in the full statement (which the Mail clearly isn't) it can be found here:

http://www.webeurope.co.uk/press-release.php


slightly different isnt it
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Nickbat on 16 March 2010, 16:06:12
WebEurope is Winn's company, so no surprises that he doesn't mention his rant in his "clarification".

My take is that he did actually say the words quoted in the Mail & The Sun.

BTW, I think he's a plonker. ;)
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: STMO999 on 16 March 2010, 16:09:56
I think he comes across like an idiot in either statement. He obviously thinks he has a valid point of view, but he takes it to a ridiculous extreme.
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Gaffers on 16 March 2010, 16:23:15
I dont know what is more disgusting, his initial outburst or the use of press release as a soapbox in some sort of justification and furthering his cause.

He will never employ anyone who has served in the forces?  Based on a minority who, in his opinion, have not reported war crimes to protect their mates?  Proof to justify his claims?  Comparing the Armed Forces of 50 odd years ago to todays force which stands for high morals and standards smacks of ignorance.  I acutally feel slighted by his comments.

I thought it was illegal to discriminate against potential employees in this way?  Should I send my CV?  ::)
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: STMO999 on 16 March 2010, 16:25:57
Quote
I dont know what is more disgusting, his initial outburst or the use of press release as a soapbox in some sort of justification and furthering his cause.

He will never employ anyone who has served in the forces?  Based on a minority who, in his opinion, have not reported war crimes to protect their mates?  Proof to justify his claims?  Comparing the Armed Forces of 50 odd years ago to todays force which stands for high morals and standards smacks of ignorance.  I acutally feel slighted by his comments.

I thought it was illegal to discriminate against potential employees in this way?  Should I send my CV?  ::)


No. Send a dog turd.
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Kevin Wood on 16 March 2010, 16:32:18
Quote
No. Send a dog turd.

Wrapped round a Thunderflash.   >:(

Kevin
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Banjax on 16 March 2010, 16:33:37
Quote
WebEurope is Winn's company, so no surprises that he doesn't mention his rant in his "clarification".

My take is that he did actually say the words quoted in the Mail & The Sun.

BTW, I think he's a plonker. ;)

you do surprise me Nickbat  ;D
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Martin_1962 on 16 March 2010, 17:41:21
Waht a complete and utter prat.

I hope he gets a lot of flak for it.

However I pity his employees - the paedo bashers will be after them now
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: albitz on 16 March 2010, 19:13:43
1. If he took this stance against any other group of people - Gypsies/gays/ lesbians/immigrants etc. he would be in court on hate crime charges in the blink of an eye.
2. The utter sh1te he speaks regarding Northern Ireland clearly shows what a 100% tosser he is. Hasnt got a  clue what he is talking about.
3. Charge him with treason or deport the moron imo.
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Banjax on 17 March 2010, 09:31:21
Quote
1. If he took this stance against any other group of people - Gypsies/gays/ lesbians/immigrants etc. he would be in court on hate crime charges in the blink of an eye.
2. The utter sh1te he speaks regarding Northern Ireland clearly shows what a 100% tosser he is. Hasnt got a  clue what he is talking about.
3. Charge him with treason or deport the moron imo.

sweet jesus  :o

do you even know what a democracy is albs? you are allowed to voice opinions surely? no, just deport anyone without your blinkered, right-wing, xenophobic sensibilities...what a pleasant little england you would have left  ;D
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Gaffers on 17 March 2010, 09:45:53
Quote
Quote
1. If he took this stance against any other group of people - Gypsies/gays/ lesbians/immigrants etc. he would be in court on hate crime charges in the blink of an eye.
2. The utter sh1te he speaks regarding Northern Ireland clearly shows what a 100% tosser he is. Hasnt got a  clue what he is talking about.
3. Charge him with treason or deport the moron imo.

sweet jesus  :o

do you even know what a democracy is albs? you are allowed to voice opinions surely? no, just deport anyone without your blinkered, right-wing, xenophobic sensibilities...what a pleasant little england you would have left  ;D

Ouch dude!  Why cut him so deep!  :o
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Banjax on 17 March 2010, 09:52:59
Quote
Quote
Quote
1. If he took this stance against any other group of people - Gypsies/gays/ lesbians/immigrants etc. he would be in court on hate crime charges in the blink of an eye.
2. The utter sh1te he speaks regarding Northern Ireland clearly shows what a 100% tosser he is. Hasnt got a  clue what he is talking about.
3. Charge him with treason or deport the moron imo.

sweet jesus  :o

do you even know what a democracy is albs? you are allowed to voice opinions surely? no, just deport anyone without your blinkered, right-wing, xenophobic sensibilities...what a pleasant little england you would have left  ;D

Ouch dude!  Why cut him so deep!  :o

it was a bit harsh wasn't it? sorry Albs - i shouldn't post before the first coffee  ;D
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: Sixstring on 17 March 2010, 09:57:02
Having been in Northern Ireland in the "troubles" and seen a few things I would have rather not, does this guy really live in the real world??
Duty means you do what you are told, not always what you would do given the choice. Ex-forces are to be respected, not discriminated against.
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: STMO999 on 17 March 2010, 12:46:33
Quote
Quote
Quote
1. If he took this stance against any other group of people - Gypsies/gays/ lesbians/immigrants etc. he would be in court on hate crime charges in the blink of an eye.
2. The utter sh1te he speaks regarding Northern Ireland clearly shows what a 100% tosser he is. Hasnt got a  clue what he is talking about.
3. Charge him with treason or deport the moron imo.

sweet jesus  :o

do you even know what a democracy is albs? you are allowed to voice opinions surely? no, just deport anyone without your blinkered, right-wing, xenophobic sensibilities...what a pleasant little england you would have left  ;D

Ouch dude!  Why cut him so deep!  :o

Albs won't care. Being blinkered, right wing and xenophobic, he's used to it.
Title: Re: is this bloke for real
Post by: albitz on 17 March 2010, 13:41:38
Being called undemocratic by a paid up member of the loony left doesnt even scratch never mind cut.  ::) ;D ;D
Shall we talk about those great democrats Brown and Bliar, who have all but destroyed Parliamentary democracy in the UK, or shall we discuss that great left wing democratic institution the EU ?
Maybe it wouldnt be right to deport the bloke, I do believe in free speech after all. Probably more appropriate constitutionally to hang him for treason. ;) :)