Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 21 March 2011, 19:51:34
-
Which would be faster round a track ?
An RG500 Suzuki as ridden by one Mr B.Sheene in the late seventies and early eighties......or....... a modern production sportsbike such as a Suzuki GSXR1000.
As a sad old bast*rd I'd hate to think that a spotty seventeen year old can pass his bike test and then ride a faster bike than my heroes such as Barry Sheene....Kenny Roberts and Randy Mamola..... :-/
-
Which would be faster round a track ?
An RG500 Suzuki as ridden by one Mr B.Sheene in the late seventies and early eighties......or....... a modern production sportsbike such as a Suzuki GSXR1000.
As a sad old bast*rd I'd hate to think that a spotty seventeen year old can pass his bike test and then ride a faster bike than my heroes such as Barry Sheene....Kenny Roberts and Randy Mamola..... :-/
not sure about a correct answer but
1x seventeen year old spotty kid + 1 gsxr1000 = 0mph to coffin in about 2 weeks or less :( :(
-
I would say the GXR1000 would be faster. The RG500 although an awesome bike are a little dated now.
Although if Bazza was still alive I would put my money on him beating any spotty 17 year old on a GSXR1000 unless it was a spotty Valentino Rossi of course ;D
-
RG would still probably be quicker round a track.
Anyway we all miss Barry
-
My money would be on Martin on his 125 ;D
-
Iirc MCN did a direct comparison about 10 years ago between Barrys old RG500 and a Honda Fireblade. The Fireblade was quite a lot faster than the RG500. Any of todays Litre sportsbikes are a lot faster than a Fireblade was 10 years ago.
Iirc the old RG500 was around 110bhp, and had very skinny tyres (and crap brakes). Todays sportsbikes are around 180bhp, with 180 or 190 section rear tyres, and brakes which could put the unwary over the bars, quicker than you could say "hamfisted".
-
All the current crop of 600cc machines would wup Bazzas RG.
The original Gsxr 1000 put out 160bhp back in y2k .And brake systems require no more than a 2 fingered grab at most to achieve maximum braking effect with the back wheel waving in the air.
Car performance has improved considerably also though obviously.
-
Iirc MCN did a direct comparison about 10 years ago between Barrys old RG500 and a Honda Fireblade. The Fireblade was quite a lot faster than the RG500. Any of todays Litre sportsbikes are a lot faster than a Fireblade was 10 years ago.
Iirc the old RG500 was around 110bhp, and had very skinny tyres (and crap brakes). Todays sportsbikes are around 180bhp, with 180 or 190 section rear tyres, and brakes which could put the unwary over the bars, quicker than you could say "hamfisted".
Yes Albs. I seem to recall figures of 110/120 BHP back in the seventies. But I believe that the RG500 weighed little more than 115kg dry. So it's power to weight ratio is probably pretty similar.
-
Power /weight ratio is similar to a litre road bike of today. Approx 1bhp/1kg.Tyres/brakes/suspension/chassis design has moved forward in huge leaps and bounds in the intervening years though.
The old bike would take more skill and guts to ride fast though imo. Skinny tyres, crap brakes, frame made from plasticine, and a vicious 2 stroke power band (more like an on/off switch) all conspire to make it a widowmaker of a bike.
-
My money would be on Martin on his 125 ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Power /weight ratio is similar to a litre road bike of today. Approx 1bhp/1kg.Tyres/brakes/suspension/chassis design has moved forward in huge leaps and bounds in the intervening years though.
The old bike would take more skill and guts to ride fast though imo. Skinny tyres, crap brakes, frame made from plasticine, and a vicious 2 stroke power band (more like an on/off switch) all conspire to make it a widowmaker of a bike.
.....always hankered after a Kawasaki 500/750 two stroke triple from the seventies..... :y :y :y
-
Iirc MCN did a direct comparison about 10 years ago between Barrys old RG500 and a Honda Fireblade. The Fireblade was quite a lot faster than the RG500. Any of todays Litre sportsbikes are a lot faster than a Fireblade was 10 years ago.
Iirc the old RG500 was around 110bhp, and had very skinny tyres (and crap brakes). Todays sportsbikes are around 180bhp, with 180 or 190 section rear tyres, and brakes which could put the unwary over the bars, quicker than you could say "hamfisted".
Kin eck,
I tend to use what whatever power I have available to its maximum.(When I am in the mood)
My Slyvia turbo in it's day impressed me with it's handling and would have benifitted nicely from an extra 50BHP+ as it only had 135 back then. It was a hellofalot faster to a ton up the the 3.0 mig, both would sit at 125mph all day long - but 180 bhp on a sportsbike is mind boggling, just wondering how much power the elite would need just to have the same power to weight ratio. (Hello Rats Omega ::))
-
I have ridden both back in the day (and came off the 500 and lived to tell the tale).Imo the 500 was the more exciting of the two. Handled worse, brakes were worse, and the power came in all at once. It was a bit like being kicked by a horse, while halfway round a bend.Front wheel trying to head skywards, while the swingarm was tying itself in knots.
Remember going flat out down a long straight, speedo reading around 125 and the bloody thing was determined to wander across into the oncoming line of traffic.
Seemed like fun at the time. ::)
Ironically, it was a little KH250 which almost killed me. Although to be fair it wasnt reallt its fault. Much alcohol (it was 1976) and the rear end of a stationary car cant really be blamed on the bike. :-[
-
I have ridden both back in the day (and came off the 500 and lived to tell the tale).Imo the 500 was the more exciting of the two. Handled worse, brakes were worse, and the power came in all at once. It was a bit like being kicked by a horse, while halfway round a bend.Front wheel trying to head skywards, while the swingarm was tying itself in knots.
Remember going flat out down a long straight, speedo reading around 125 and the bloody thing was determined to wander across into the oncoming line of traffic.
Seemed like fun at the time. ::)
You and I clearly have a very different definition of fun.. ;D
-
Iirc MCN did a direct comparison about 10 years ago between Barrys old RG500 and a Honda Fireblade. The Fireblade was quite a lot faster than the RG500. Any of todays Litre sportsbikes are a lot faster than a Fireblade was 10 years ago.
Iirc the old RG500 was around 110bhp, and had very skinny tyres (and crap brakes). Todays sportsbikes are around 180bhp, with 180 or 190 section rear tyres, and brakes which could put the unwary over the bars, quicker than you could say "hamfisted".
Kin eck,
I tend to use what whatever power I have available to its maximum.(When I am in the mood)
My Slyvia turbo in it's day impressed me with it's handling and would have benifitted nicely from an extra 50BHP+ as it only had 135 back then. It was a hellofalot faster to a ton up the the 3.0 mig, both would sit at 125mph all day long - but 180 bhp on a sportsbike is mind boggling, just wondering how much power the elite would need just to have the same power to weight ratio. (Hello Rats Omega ::))
Upwards of 1600bhp. ;) :o.......that would be nice. :)
-
I have ridden both back in the day (and came off the 500 and lived to tell the tale).Imo the 500 was the more exciting of the two. Handled worse, brakes were worse, and the power came in all at once. It was a bit like being kicked by a horse, while halfway round a bend.Front wheel trying to head skywards, while the swingarm was tying itself in knots.
Remember going flat out down a long straight, speedo reading around 125 and the bloody thing was determined to wander across into the oncoming line of traffic.
Seemed like fun at the time. ::)
You and I clearly have a very different definition of fun.. ;D
Well, I was only 16. We tend to feel invincible at that age. ::) ;D
My early biking period was cut short 16 days before my 17th birthday, which was a shame. I could have been legal and everything. :D ;D ;D