Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: unlucky mark mv6 on 08 July 2009, 12:18:06

Title: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: unlucky mark mv6 on 08 July 2009, 12:18:06
How much of a difference is it between the two and is it that much noticeable. :y
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: bob.dent on 08 July 2009, 12:31:48
2.6 is around 176bhp and 3.2 around 213bhp.
I used to have a 2.5v6 estate and now have a 3.2v6 estate and the difference is very noticeable, but I'm not sure how much difference with the 2.6.
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: joshwyatt on 08 July 2009, 12:52:52
I have a 2003 Omega brochure, and the figures for performance are as follows, I know it's not real world figures but should give you an idea...

2.6 saloon manual (auto figures in brackets):
0-60 in 8.5 secs (9.5)
Top speed 142 mph (139)

2.6 estate manual (auto):
0-60 in 9.0 secs (10.0)
Top speed 137 mph (134)

3.2 saloon auto
149 top speed, 0-60 in 8.0 secs

3.2 estate auto
144 top speed, 0-60 in 8.5 secs
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: unlucky mark mv6 on 08 July 2009, 13:02:31
Quote
I have a 2003 Omega brochure, and the figures for performance are as follows, I know it's not real world figures but should give you an idea...

2.6 saloon manual (auto figures in brackets):
0-60 in 8.5 secs (9.5)
Top speed 142 mph (139)

2.6 estate manual (auto):
0-60 in 9.0 secs (10.0)
Top speed 137 mph (134)

3.2 saloon auto
149 top speed, 0-60 in 8.0 secs

3.2 estate auto
144 top speed, 0-60 in 8.5 secs
Thanks folks,reason i ask is my brother is on lookout for a mig now and wants to swap his vec 2.2 sri(slightly modded),if anyone is interested.Looking for 2.6 or 3.2 ,mv6 or elite. :y
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: webby23 on 08 July 2009, 16:43:54
My 2.6 MV6 auto feels alot faster than those times suggest although I havent timed the sprint up to 60.

Top speed I darent try....on 6 pts already.....but it cruises lovely at 70-90mph on the motorway, with 80 being a real acceleration sweet spot........

 :y
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: Martin_1962 on 08 July 2009, 17:49:02
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: Omega man 2 on 08 July 2009, 18:06:04
Is there any official figures for a 3.2 manual, with it not being for sale to the general pubic ::)
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: Macduff on 08 July 2009, 21:05:13
My 2.6 seems fast enough to me, my only complaint is it didn't come with a twin exhaust which looks so much better

I am currently looking for a 3.2 back box but not having any luck (but I don't want to pay full price as I'm as tight as a ducks bum) thought I'd take a chance and put that last bit in just in case somebody on OOF has one going spare sorry havn't got enough posts yet
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: Martin_1962 on 08 July 2009, 21:11:56
Quote
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto


When the MAF worked properly ::)
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: amigov6 on 08 July 2009, 21:19:23
Quote
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto
We tested this at York in real terms. I was driving Richard Irv's lovely 2.6 auto MV6 using the gears manually so quicker than sport button. Surprised at how well it pulled but twice Ian_D passed me in his 3.0 auto Elite despite me getting away first. ::)
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: Martin_1962 on 08 July 2009, 21:31:10
Quote
Quote
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto
We tested this at York in real terms. I was driving Richard Irv's lovely 2.6 auto MV6 using the gears manually so quicker than sport button. Surprised at how well it pulled but twice Ian_D passed me in his 3.0 auto Elite despite me getting away first. ::)

What cams does Richard have?
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: feeutfo on 09 July 2009, 05:00:58
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: Dazzler on 09 July 2009, 23:24:15
Quote
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.

I agree :y

Bring on the 3.2 ;D
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: i260 on 10 July 2009, 00:51:56
Quote
2.6 is around 176bhp and 3.2 around 213bhp.
I used to have a 2.5v6 estate and now have a 3.2v6 estate and the difference is very noticeable, but I'm not sure how much difference with the 2.6.

2.5  to 2.6 is noticable in a 10bhp sort of way. My dad had both and instantly noticed the difference when getting into the 2.6.

If the right 2.6 came along don't ignore it, just get some 3.2 cams (or lob a 3.2 into it!).

Quote
My 2.6 seems fast enough to me, my only complaint is it didn't come with a twin exhaust which looks so much better

I am currently looking for a 3.2 back box but not having any luck (but I don't want to pay full price as I'm as tight as a ducks bum) thought I'd take a chance and put that last bit in just in case somebody on OOF has one going spare sorry havn't got enough posts yet

Get the Eternal item - £40 delivered.

Quote
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.

Only if you have decent tread on your  tyres on the back of the 2.6! My tail slides nicely thank you very much - part worn Dunlops or Pirellis or something as fitted as std from factory.
Title: Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
Post by: feeutfo on 10 July 2009, 01:04:54
Quote
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.
Quote
Only if you have decent tread on your  tyres on the back of the 2.6! My tail slides nicely thank you very much - part worn Dunlops or Pirellis or something as fitted as std from factory.
:-)