Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: stuthespread on 28 January 2010, 20:44:02
-
just worked out my mpg and it comes out at average 29.thats 65 litres with at least 420miles between fill ups.is this a descent return or have i got my maths all wrong?
-
better than mine at least!, 25 mpg approx..
-
Indicated 25 mpg on the trip computer.
-
Looks like youve worked it out right.
Found this site the other day when I wanted to work out my wifes Audis MPG (it came out at 64mpg by the way, 93 Audi 80 TDi)
http://www.torquecars.com/tools/uk-mpg-calculator.php
Its bl@@dy good, tells you how much your car costs per mile and what it will cost over 1200 miles (you may want to look away at that point ;D ;D)
I was just outside Saffron Walden on Tuesday, Little Walden, at a converted farm that supplies the big pictures prints to Ikea and the like. Beautiful part of the world, cr@p phone reception though ;D
Wayne
-
I discovered that if I listen to slow mp3 songs , I can get 32-33 ;D this means mostly I drive stressed :-/
-
Perhaps we should take topography into account?
Dont know about Ankara, but iirc, if your dog runs off in Saffron Walden you can watch him go for days. Or is that Lincolnshire ;)
-
Perhaps we should take topography into account?
Dont know about Ankara, but iirc, if your dog runs off in Saffron Walden you can watch him go for days. Or is that Lincolnshire ;)
Both ;D ;D
-
Definalty Lincolnshire. My cars forgotten what hills are ;D
-
Dont think ive ever gotten above 23mpg average on the trip in the MV6... ;D
-
Perhaps we should take topography into account?
Dont know about Ankara, but iirc, if your dog runs off in Saffron Walden you can watch him go for days. Or is that Lincolnshire ;)
mostly flat.. only problem, crowded start stop traffic in rush hours..
-
Why do I seem to get the same mpg as v6's :(
-
Why do I seem to get the same mpg as v6's :(
we found that with our 2.2
Youve still got to accelerate a bloody great car up to speed, requires about the same amount of energy whatever engine is in it.
V6 driven slow to normal is the same economy as a 4 pot in our experience, as you tend to be a lot more heavy footed in the smaller engine.
however when you drive the V6 with a heavy foot, that economy drops right down.
-
I have driven very carefully in the 2.2 while I've owned it. But recently I have started to drive it with a bit more aggression, heavier right foot ::)
Result, well I expected less MPG but no it's about the same............a paltry 23mpg, this is just on short journeys :-?
Mick
-
in this cold weather mines doing 28 mpg on motorway runs :o
Usually its 34-35 ish
Not brilliant, but its reliable, smooth, comfy, costs sod all to run, so its staying!
-
in this cold weather mines doing 28 mpg on motorway runs :o
Usually its 34-35 ish
Not brilliant, but its reliable, smooth, comfy, costs sod all to run, so its staying!
Free petrol ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Mick :D
-
my tractor gets 33 on m-ways and 21 round town.
i found whilst canning it up the back roads (a corner about every 200yrds) i held it in second revs about 3000-4000 it gets a better mpg round the twisty roads than when i its in drive.
peaks around 20mpg in second and it peaks 13mpg in drive.
great fun though :y
-
in this cold weather mines doing 28 mpg on motorway runs :o
Usually its 34-35 ish
Not brilliant, but its reliable, smooth, comfy, costs sod all to run, so its staying!
Free petrol ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Mick :D
Meant in terms of maintenance, parts ect :P
-
Why do I seem to get the same mpg as v6's :(
because 1600-1700 kg is enough heavy to be the primary common factor..