Omega Owners Forum
Omega Help Area => Omega General Help => Topic started by: albitz on 10 December 2009, 23:18:47
-
simple question really,Is the back box from a saloon the same as the one from an estate ? (pre facelift) Tia. :-/
-
Don't think so
-
a cautious no. Well fairly sure tbh. When ordering my rip off vx cat back system, they gave me a mid section from an estate by mistake. Cant see how estate box would fit a saloon by the angle the pipes enter the box.
-
No - different :y
-
Thanks for the info fellas. :y :(
-
differant part numbers on eternal car web site.
P 17294 Estate.
P 17328 saloon.
Looking at 3.0 v6 ? Which is the same as 2.5 ????
-
I thought the mounts were in a different place? Why do they offer a choice for saloon and estate if they are the same?
-
Tails pipes are longer on the estate version...
-
Well they do look longer, also the mounts look different
http://store.eternalcar.com/exhaust-rear-silencer-vauxhall-p-120978.html
http://store.eternalcar.com/exhaust-rear-silencer-vauxhall-p-120952.html
-
differant part numbers on eternal car web site.
P 17294 Estate.
P 17328 saloon.
Looking at 3.0 v6 ? Which is the same as 2.5 ????
Think so chris think i remeber joshwatt putting the 3.0 twin pipe backbox on his 2.2 that he sold. Looked the dogs danglies, of course i could be completly wrong wouldn't be the first time ;D ;D
-
You're right Dave, the 3.2 backbox will fit the 2.2 and 2.6...as you correctly remember I fitted a 3.2 backbox to my 2.2.
However, the estate and saloon backboxes are different. So you can't put an estate backbox on a saloon or the vice versa.
-
Back boxes are different, centre sections are the same
-
centre sections are the same
Er...... Oh bugger it.
No their not. Differant.
There, said it. Have disagreed with the master.
Unless my dealer gave me one from a saloon and one from an Estate from another car? They gave me an Estate centre section by mistake so have seen, what a beleive to be both, side by side. The pipes enter the rear box at a very differant angle.
Provided the parts dept told me correctly of course.
Part no was Estate of some sort anyway.