Omega Owners Forum

Omega Help Area => Omega General Help => Topic started by: rajveer.sandhu on 15 July 2011, 16:00:58

Title: 3.2 Injectors vs 3.0 Injectors
Post by: rajveer.sandhu on 15 July 2011, 16:00:58

Is there any benefit to be had (performance wise) from installing 3.2 Injectors in a 3.0v6 (are they compatible)?

I'm having some G-Cams and 3.2 Manifolds installed next week, so whilst I'm getting the work done is there anything else anyone would recommend getting done?

Title: Re: 3.2 Injectors vs 3.0 Injectors
Post by: tunnie on 15 July 2011, 16:07:46

won't be any difference, 3.2 manifolds apparently are better flowing  :y

Title: Re: 3.2 Injectors vs 3.0 Injectors
Post by: rajveer.sandhu on 15 July 2011, 16:10:38

OK Thanks.
Yep hopefully the 3.2 Manifolds will yield some noticeable results.

Is there anypoint fitting a C20LET Flywheel to an Omega V6?
Some people have fitted it to Calibras and have said it does make a difference in revving up?

Title: Re: 3.2 Injectors vs 3.0 Injectors
Post by: serek on 15 July 2011, 16:16:04

Quote

OK Thanks.
Yep hopefully the 3.2 Manifolds will yield some noticeable results.

Is there anypoint fitting a C20LET Flywheel to an Omega V6?
Some people have fitted it to Calibras and have said it does make a difference in revving up?

there 2 different fly wheel type was fitted to LET engines
1st flat early engine need spacer for slave cylinder 6kgs
2nd pot type more heavy then flat type and still need spacer for slave cyl.
and different clutch kit

Title: Re: 3.2 Injectors vs 3.0 Injectors
Post by: TheBoy on 15 July 2011, 16:37:36

Quote

OK Thanks.
Yep hopefully the 3.2 Manifolds will yield some noticeable results.

Is there anypoint fitting a C20LET Flywheel to an Omega V6?
Some people have fitted it to Calibras and have said it does make a difference in revving up?

Flywheels dont make a lot of odds to real performance. It will rev up easily in neutral, but 1.8t of car means negligible effect with clutch is fully engaged...