Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 20 January 2012, 13:49:03

Title: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 20 January 2012, 13:49:03
Which  Mustang did Steve McQueen drive in the 1968 film, Bullitt?

I'm guessing it was one of the more potent models.  By the early seventies  stringent emissions regulations had all but killed off the  Detroit muscle car..... :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\.

Anyone know?
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: the alarming man on 20 January 2012, 13:53:34
1968 cid v8 320 ish bhp :y
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: RobG on 20 January 2012, 14:10:20
GT 390 with 325hp
(http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z257/belisensis/1967Bullitt-Mustang-2.jpg)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: aaronjb on 20 January 2012, 15:43:36
Sexy, sexy car. I'd love one, but fastback prices are astronomical.

I have the engine, at least, sat in my garden.. (Well, one possible engine for a Mustang - 390ci FE with iron heads, actually out of a Galaxy)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: 2boxerdogs on 20 January 2012, 16:22:48
Hired a 2010 model in August 2010 when we did the coastal drive from San Francisco-Long Beach bright red with cream leather, top down  most of the time, beautiful car 19mpg  top of my wish list if the lotto ever comes up.
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 20 January 2012, 16:25:15
Sexy, sexy car. I'd love one, but fastback prices are astronomical.

I have the engine, at least, sat in my garden.. (Well, one possible engine for a Mustang - 390ci FE with iron heads, actually out of a Galaxy)


Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong guys.

I believe that you get roughly 60 cubic inches to a litre. So 390 cubic inches is (counts fingers and thumbs).....six and a bit litres. Do I have that right? 
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: aaronjb on 20 January 2012, 16:35:48
Yup, 390ci is roughly 6.5ltr and was anywhere from (from memory) 250hp to 350hp in original form (although it has catastrophically restrictive iron heads with two tiny valves per cylinder).. I also have a 428ci FE - roughly 7ltr - though that has Edelbrock aluminium heads and TWR throttle bodies, so will hopefully put out an awful lot more than 300hp ;)

(And while the headline hp figures look low, remember that some of these engines will have more torque at 1000rpm than a lot of cars have peak..)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 20 January 2012, 17:14:18
Yup, 390ci is roughly 6.5ltr and was anywhere from (from memory) 250hp to 350hp in original form (although it has catastrophically restrictive iron heads with two tiny valves per cylinder).. I also have a 428ci FE - roughly 7ltr - though that has Edelbrock aluminium heads and TWR throttle bodies, so will hopefully put out an awful lot more than 300hp ;)

(And while the headline hp figures look low, remember that some of these engines will have more torque at 1000rpm than a lot of cars have peak..)


.....should drop nicely into that old Datsun of yours, Aaron..... ::) ::) ::) ::) ;)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: tunnie on 20 January 2012, 19:55:13
GT 390 with 325hp
(http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z257/belisensis/1967Bullitt-Mustang-2.jpg)

Stunning!  :-*
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Darth Loo-knee on 20 January 2012, 20:00:45
Agreed a lovely looking car :y
My favourite America car has to be the Dukes of Hazard car, I think its a Dodge Charger..
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: RobG on 20 January 2012, 20:39:28
(http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z257/belisensis/hazardcar.jpg)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: aaronjb on 20 January 2012, 20:50:54
Yup, 390ci is roughly 6.5ltr and was anywhere from (from memory) 250hp to 350hp in original form (although it has catastrophically restrictive iron heads with two tiny valves per cylinder).. I also have a 428ci FE - roughly 7ltr - though that has Edelbrock aluminium heads and TWR throttle bodies, so will hopefully put out an awful lot more than 300hp ;)

(And while the headline hp figures look low, remember that some of these engines will have more torque at 1000rpm than a lot of cars have peak..)


.....should drop nicely into that old Datsun of yours, Aaron..... ::) ::) ::) ::) ;)

 ;D Nah - an LS engine would, though.. But no, the FE is destined for the kit car for which I placed the chassis order in December ;)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Darth Loo-knee on 20 January 2012, 21:14:21
(http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z257/belisensis/hazardcar.jpg)

Thats the Baby Rob  :y
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 20 January 2012, 21:39:16
Yup, 390ci is roughly 6.5ltr and was anywhere from (from memory) 250hp to 350hp in original form (although it has catastrophically restrictive iron heads with two tiny valves per cylinder).. I also have a 428ci FE - roughly 7ltr - though that has Edelbrock aluminium heads and TWR throttle bodies, so will hopefully put out an awful lot more than 300hp ;)

(And while the headline hp figures look low, remember that some of these engines will have more torque at 1000rpm than a lot of cars have peak..)


.....should drop nicely into that old Datsun of yours, Aaron..... ::) ::) ::) ::) ;)

http://youtu.be/qSJVi1mPjZQ (http://youtu.be/qSJVi1mPjZQ)

V8 in a datsun, yes please  :y :y (http://V8 in a datsun, yes please  :y :y)
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: aaronjb on 20 January 2012, 22:03:00
Yup, 390ci is roughly 6.5ltr and was anywhere from (from memory) 250hp to 350hp in original form (although it has catastrophically restrictive iron heads with two tiny valves per cylinder).. I also have a 428ci FE - roughly 7ltr - though that has Edelbrock aluminium heads and TWR throttle bodies, so will hopefully put out an awful lot more than 300hp ;)

(And while the headline hp figures look low, remember that some of these engines will have more torque at 1000rpm than a lot of cars have peak..)


.....should drop nicely into that old Datsun of yours, Aaron..... ::) ::) ::) ::) ;)

http://youtu.be/qSJVi1mPjZQ (http://youtu.be/qSJVi1mPjZQ)

V8 in a datsun, yes please  :y :y (http://V8 in a datsun, yes please  :y :y)

I would love a 240Z with a big V8 up front :) Trouble is that over here your options for a 240Z are either 'absolute basket case rust bucket' or 'recently restored with enormous price tag' :(
Title: Re: Which Mustang?.
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 20 January 2012, 22:20:08
Yup, 390ci is roughly 6.5ltr and was anywhere from (from memory) 250hp to 350hp in original form (although it has catastrophically restrictive iron heads with two tiny valves per cylinder).. I also have a 428ci FE - roughly 7ltr - though that has Edelbrock aluminium heads and TWR throttle bodies, so will hopefully put out an awful lot more than 300hp ;)

(And while the headline hp figures look low, remember that some of these engines will have more torque at 1000rpm than a lot of cars have peak..)


.....should drop nicely into that old Datsun of yours, Aaron..... ::) ::) ::) ::) ;)

http://youtu.be/qSJVi1mPjZQ (http://youtu.be/qSJVi1mPjZQ)

V8 in a datsun, yes please  :y :y (http://V8 in a datsun, yes please  :y :y)

I would love a 240Z with a big V8 up front :) Trouble is that over here your options for a 240Z are either 'absolute basket case rust bucket' or 'recently restored with enormous price tag' :(


The later 260Z and 280ZX never quite held the same appeal for me. Mainly designed with the American meerkat in mind, I think.