Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Rear of car seems low  (Read 3691 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RobG

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol
  • Posts: 13831
  • I might have a link, pic or part number for that
    • 16 plate Mokka. Vivaro
    • View Profile
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #15 on: 07 December 2013, 23:18:06 »

KYB RX6226 springs fitted in 2011 by previous owner along with a cheap pair of rear shocks. No leaks from shocks, no busted coils. Height from road to arch is 65mm. When rear seats loaded the rear mudflaps scrape the surface over the slightest hump in the road and do the same when cornering left or right. Thinking rubbish shockers ??? ??? ???

They are standard (NON self levelling) shocks for 3.2 saloon, so they are correct with standard non sl shocks. Failed shocks tend to give a bouncy uncontrolled spring rate. Bouncing the rear of the car by hand should give a push down, release, up down stop action to the rear, and be very hard work to keep the car bouncing by hand. Test in neutral with hand brake off, and chock the font wheels if its in a slope. If it keeps bouncing easily after you let go the shocks are buggered.
 Iirc the usual ride height for an elite 3.2 with sl is 675mm. While the shocks do hold the car up, I'd be surprised if the shocks account for 25mm of ride height. So I would also be checking for busted springs. Tbh.
Checked today Chris, both springs in good order ???
Logged
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

UPVC windows/doors/fascias/soffit/gutters supplied/fitted

RobG

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol
  • Posts: 13831
  • I might have a link, pic or part number for that
    • 16 plate Mokka. Vivaro
    • View Profile
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #16 on: 07 December 2013, 23:19:04 »

Just go add, you could just as easily wack some Sl shocks on. They will work just as well. But test the pump still works first I guess.
Car is a 2.2 saloon, standard suspension
Logged
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

UPVC windows/doors/fascias/soffit/gutters supplied/fitted

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #17 on: 07 December 2013, 23:20:26 »

Not the breaker then. ::)
Logged

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #18 on: 07 December 2013, 23:22:01 »

Sorry. Braker! ;)
Logged

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #19 on: 07 December 2013, 23:25:01 »

Same no. for 2.2.

Correct springs. Try another set of shocks then. I'm sure you have them on the shelf. ;)
Logged

RobG

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol
  • Posts: 13831
  • I might have a link, pic or part number for that
    • 16 plate Mokka. Vivaro
    • View Profile
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #20 on: 07 December 2013, 23:26:51 »

Same no. for 2.2.

Correct springs. Try another set of shocks then. I'm sure you have them on the shelf. ;)
I did. B4`s. They`re on an Irish oofers car now ::)
Logged
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

UPVC windows/doors/fascias/soffit/gutters supplied/fitted

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #21 on: 07 December 2013, 23:36:11 »

Same no. for 2.2.

Correct springs. Try another set of shocks then. I'm sure you have them on the shelf. ;)
I did. B4`s. They`re on an Irish oofers car now ::)

Break Brake the 2.2 and keep the 3.2. :y
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107026
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #22 on: 08 December 2013, 09:21:19 »

Some stupid, retarded people pay good money to have their cars slammed low   8)
Fixed
Logged
Grumpy old man

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #23 on: 08 December 2013, 09:54:46 »

KYB RX6226 springs fitted in 2011 by previous owner along with a cheap pair of rear shocks. No leaks from shocks, no busted coils. Height from road to arch is 65mm. When rear seats loaded the rear mudflaps scrape the surface over the slightest hump in the road and do the same when cornering left or right. Thinking rubbish shockers ??? ??? ???


That really is low.  :o :o ::) ;D
Properly slammed ;D

Some people pay good money to have their cars slammed low   8)





 ;D :y

there is only one way to drive an omega like that.... a perfect race track..

if I use daily , will have more damage than the omega is worth within few days..
Logged

Big_Al

  • Guest
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #24 on: 08 December 2013, 17:50:06 »

Just out of curiosity Rob  . . whats the front measuring ?

as Chris G says   standard suspension  ride height should be 675mm all round (660mm for MV6/sport)

I would also doubt knackered shocks would cause a 25mm drop  to 650mm :-\ :-\

Logged

RobG

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol
  • Posts: 13831
  • I might have a link, pic or part number for that
    • 16 plate Mokka. Vivaro
    • View Profile
Re: Rear of car seems low
« Reply #25 on: 08 December 2013, 17:53:44 »

Just out of curiosity Rob  . . whats the front measuring ?

as Chris G says   standard suspension  ride height should be 675mm all round (660mm for MV6/sport)

I would also doubt knackered shocks would cause a 25mm drop  to 650mm :-\ :-\
660mm

Logged
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

UPVC windows/doors/fascias/soffit/gutters supplied/fitted
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 17 queries.