Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Martin_1962]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/8035511.stm

[Welung666]

All I can say is   What a idiot

[Bo Bo]

That's made my day!  

[Kieran]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/suffolk/8035511.stm

Also a good feature about the problems with rats as well at the bottom of the page

[Proz]

You got to love them speed cameras   :

[platty]

He would get twice as long a ban, and twice as many points if I were the judge! To**pot  

[Omegadoha, Desert Member]

LoL- I trust there was 'robust' evidence to convict him  

[crazyjoetavola]

Well that's one thing about technology - it's indiscriminate (not always a good thing)

[cam2502]

haha,now he knows how it feels!!!

[largecol]

Ha ha nice one , but i expect is more the embarressment factor for him - doubt the £300 will hurt him.
By the way , when did speed cameras become `safety cameras`?? More spin?

[ians]

Indeed and they are managed by 'Safety Camera Partnerships' - sounds very luvy duvy doesn't it.  Basically its the Police and local council plus other pointless entities.

[going crazy]

Well, I am glad. Good that speed safety camera's are not discrimatory

[Phil]

I don't get the penalty, you either get points OR a ban, not both, UNLESS you end up with 12 or more via 'totting up'.

If he had any sort of a clue he should have taken a short term ban and avoided the points.

Its what i did, just over 103mph average on, funnily enough, the A14, went to court, in Sudbury, and my solicitor suggest a short ban would be better than points and i got 28 days and no points and £300 fine, mind you it was nearly 7 years ago  

[cem_devecioglu]

justice for all