Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: X30XE "Choclate Engine"  (Read 4655 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33985
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #15 on: 06 June 2008, 08:42:47 »

Quote
Quote
So what's a crankshaft made out of if it's not steel? :-?

Humpy
cast iron presumably  :-/


Yep....
Logged

unclelicklug

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sheffield
  • Posts: 255
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #16 on: 06 June 2008, 09:14:50 »

Standard crank is generally machined from a cast iron blank, cheap to make and easy machining, not the best ultimate strength/lightness.
For more demanding applications a forged steel blank is used, the base metal has better strength characteristics (the forging process will also improve this) so the crank can potentially be lighter and/or lighter stronger.
« Last Edit: 06 June 2008, 09:29:45 by unclelicklug »
Logged

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #17 on: 06 June 2008, 09:45:03 »

Quote
Standard crank is generally machined from a cast iron blank, cheap to make and easy machining, not the best ultimate strength/lightness.
For more demanding applications a forged steel blank is used, the base metal has better strength characteristics (the forging process will also improve this) so the crank can potentially be lighter and/or lighter stronger.

Not sure if the standard-tuned Omegas engine actually needs this (not that it a bad thing to have mind you), it's more likely there in preparation for the higher-tuned versions that found their way into some Vectras....

« Last Edit: 06 June 2008, 09:45:27 by markjay »
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33985
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #18 on: 06 June 2008, 10:29:00 »

Quote
Quote
Standard crank is generally machined from a cast iron blank, cheap to make and easy machining, not the best ultimate strength/lightness.
For more demanding applications a forged steel blank is used, the base metal has better strength characteristics (the forging process will also improve this) so the crank can potentially be lighter and/or lighter stronger.

Not sure if the standard-tuned Omegas engine actually needs this (not that it a bad thing to have mind you), it's more likely there in preparation for the higher-tuned versions that found their way into some Vectras....


There were no new higher tuned versions of the 3.2 in the Vectra...........
Logged

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #19 on: 06 June 2008, 11:05:41 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Standard crank is generally machined from a cast iron blank, cheap to make and easy machining, not the best ultimate strength/lightness.
For more demanding applications a forged steel blank is used, the base metal has better strength characteristics (the forging process will also improve this) so the crank can potentially be lighter and/or lighter stronger.

Not sure if the standard-tuned Omegas engine actually needs this (not that it a bad thing to have mind you), it's more likely there in preparation for the higher-tuned versions that found their way into some Vectras....


There were no new higher tuned versions of the 3.2 in the Vectra...........

OK... I thought the VXRs used the same blocks as the 2.6/3.2 on their V6 2.8 Turbo versions?


Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

robby30

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Berkshire
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #20 on: 06 June 2008, 13:18:38 »

Thats enough abuse about my driving for one week thanks!
i have driven both the 3.0 and 3.2 as old bill cars and i can only think of one engine failure, that was due to a 4th to 3rd change at about 115 during a pursuit (Not by me) it was quite spectacular with a big hole in the bottom of the engine.
The failures we had were almost always HBV's. the heads were sometimes changed but the mechainics blamed that on the endless hours of idling at the scenes of accidents.
and as for that thing that you call the rev limiter the technical name for its is the gear change indicator ;D
i have owned a 3.2 manual old bill car for over 20 months now. in its day it was a slough traffic car its had many a staring role on roadwars, same engine and gearbox 140k at least 6 shades of white and now a veteran of 4 track days, the nurburg ring and a john o groats to lands end.
its been faultless :y :y
now thats a car!
Logged

Jimbob

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Chester / Flintshire
  • Posts: 24523
  • I like traffic lights, but only when they're green
    • E250 Est / Golf GTI
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #21 on: 06 June 2008, 13:20:03 »

Hate to know what he thinks about those scoda's made out of cake then  ;D ;D ;D

Mr Skrunts

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Skruntie Land.
  • Posts: 25642
  • 3.O Elite Saloon with all the toys,
    • 2003 CD 2.2 Auto
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #22 on: 06 June 2008, 14:09:56 »

Quote
Thats enough abuse about my driving for one week thanks!
i have driven both the 3.0 and 3.2 as old bill cars and i can only think of one engine failure, that was due to a 4th to 3rd change at about 115 during a pursuit (Not by me) it was quite spectacular with a big hole in the bottom of the engine.
The failures we had were almost always HBV's. the heads were sometimes changed but the mechainics blamed that on the endless hours of idling at the scenes of accidents.
and as for that thing that you call the rev limiter the technical name for its is the gear change indicator ;D
i have owned a 3.2 manual old bill car for over 20 months now. in its day it was a slough traffic car its had many a staring role on roadwars, same engine and gearbox 140k at least 6 shades of white and now a veteran of 4 track days, the nurburg ring and a john o groats to lands end.
its been faultless :y :y
now thats a car!

At the end of the day that has to be put down to damage caused by bad driving then and even a rev limiter will cut the engine based on a pre determined rev limit, not a gear change, which again would not happen on an auto.
Logged
Ask yourself :  " WHY do I believe in what I believe?"

Remember that my opinions expressed here are not representative of the opinions of other members on the OOF Forum.

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33985
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #23 on: 06 June 2008, 14:11:29 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Standard crank is generally machined from a cast iron blank, cheap to make and easy machining, not the best ultimate strength/lightness.
For more demanding applications a forged steel blank is used, the base metal has better strength characteristics (the forging process will also improve this) so the crank can potentially be lighter and/or lighter stronger.

Not sure if the standard-tuned Omegas engine actually needs this (not that it a bad thing to have mind you), it's more likely there in preparation for the higher-tuned versions that found their way into some Vectras....


There were no new higher tuned versions of the 3.2 in the Vectra...........

OK... I thought the VXRs used the same blocks as the 2.6/3.2 on their V6 2.8 Turbo versions?



A totally different new generation global engine with variable valve timing, turbo the lot.
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #24 on: 06 June 2008, 14:37:53 »

Quote
Hate to know what he thinks about those scoda's made out of cake then  ;D ;D ;D

You would eat it!
Logged

tmx

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Herefordshire
  • Posts: 2131
    • 3.2 MV6 2002
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #25 on: 06 June 2008, 15:13:40 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Standard crank is generally machined from a cast iron blank, cheap to make and easy machining, not the best ultimate strength/lightness.
For more demanding applications a forged steel blank is used, the base metal has better strength characteristics (the forging process will also improve this) so the crank can potentially be lighter and/or lighter stronger.

Not sure if the standard-tuned Omegas engine actually needs this (not that it a bad thing to have mind you), it's more likely there in preparation for the higher-tuned versions that found their way into some Vectras....


There were no new higher tuned versions of the 3.2 in the Vectra...........

OK... I thought the VXRs used the same blocks as the 2.6/3.2 on their V6 2.8 Turbo versions?




Vauxhalls VXR Vectra engine is a Saab 2.8 V6 Bi Turbo engine it started life in a saab and vauxhall have borrowed it off saab!
Logged

robby30

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Berkshire
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Re: X30XE "Choclate Engine"
« Reply #26 on: 06 June 2008, 16:37:03 »

Quote
Quote
Thats enough abuse about my driving for one week thanks!
i have driven both the 3.0 and 3.2 as old bill cars and i can only think of one engine failure, that was due to a 4th to 3rd change at about 115 during a pursuit (Not by me) it was quite spectacular with a big hole in the bottom of the engine.
The failures we had were almost always HBV's. the heads were sometimes changed but the mechainics blamed that on the endless hours of idling at the scenes of accidents.
and as for that thing that you call the rev limiter the technical name for its is the gear change indicator ;D
i have owned a 3.2 manual old bill car for over 20 months now. in its day it was a slough traffic car its had many a staring role on roadwars, same engine and gearbox 140k at least 6 shades of white and now a veteran of 4 track days, the nurburg ring and a john o groats to lands end.
its been faultless :y :y
now thats a car!

At the end of the day that has to be put down to damage caused by bad driving then and even a rev limiter will cut the engine based on a pre determined rev limit, not a gear change, which again would not happen on an auto.



dont get me wrong that was bad driving that made the engine blow up the chap who did it may even admit to it!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 21 queries.