Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 3.0 Throttle body vs 3.2  (Read 470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rajveer.sandhu

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
    • View Profile
3.0 Throttle body vs 3.2
« on: 24 May 2011, 16:45:26 »
Hi,

Is there any difference between the 3.2 Throttle Body and the 3.0 Throttle body?

Would there be any benefit fitting a 3.2 TB and 3.2 Plenum to a 3.0?
Logged

RobG

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol
  • Posts: 13831
  • I might have a link, pic or part number for that
    • 16 plate Mokka. Vivaro
    • View Profile
Re: 3.0 Throttle body vs 3.2
« Reply #1 on: 24 May 2011, 16:54:25 »
IIRC 3.2 body is different as it`s a DBW throttle and I don`t think the TPS is a separate item unlike the 3.0
Logged
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

UPVC windows/doors/fascias/soffit/gutters supplied/fitted

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36387
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: 3.0 Throttle body vs 3.2
« Reply #2 on: 24 May 2011, 16:55:00 »
Aside from the fact that the 3.2 throttle body is drive-by-wire and not compatible with the engine management on the 3.0; no. There would be no benefit in swapping them if you could.

Same with the plenum. 3.2 plenum is identical, except that you can't mount the EGR and ICV, so it wouldn't work.

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

rajveer.sandhu

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
    • View Profile
Re: 3.0 Throttle body vs 3.2
« Reply #3 on: 24 May 2011, 16:57:26 »
OK thanks guys
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 19 queries.