She tried to be clever for revenge against her husband and has come unstuck. She tried to imply it was somebody else that had taken the points, but then admitted it was her after The Sunday Times dug a bit deeper and then tried the marriage coercion defense which the jury didn't believe.
Personally, I think they deserve each other for the lying, cheating, bottom feeding pond life that they both are and also thinking that they were both big enough to be above the law.
It reminds me of somebody that I know who was very economical with the truth on what he earned to the taxman. He had an affair, left his wife and then ended up with a big tax bill where she shopped him.
I think the moral of the story is don't leave the wife if she knows you have done illegal things or you have done them together, where there is no wroth like a woman scorned.
I hope they have both lost their careers and their Government pensions.
Author
Topic: Guilty . . . . but (Read 537 times)