Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Engines With A Differnce  (Read 6087 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #60 on: 24 September 2008, 22:41:47 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Wot about the Wankel?

Sorry, should have said  "Vot about the Wankel?"


Yes Jereboam, what has been the development of this "revolutionary" engine of the 1960s? :-/

I know Mazda once had the worldwide patent rights, and used it in some models, with, as understood it, problems developing on its tri-rotor contact points with the master 'cylinder / chamber'.

Was it further developed with these issue resolved?  Is it installed in any cars in 2008?  Is it still Mazda who have sole rights on it?
What, if any, are still the challenges with this engine design? :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/

 :y :y

Mazda still produce the RX8 which has a rotary engine it in, but its emissions are very high and this could effectively see the end of it, which is a shame as it is now a engine that has it's issues pretty much sorted out.

The original Rotary engine in the RO80 was prone to burning it's rotor tips, this was very expensive and so people ended up putting ford V4 engines is as a replacement, Mazda were still having issues when the RX7 first came out, but during the life of the RX7 they ironed out a lot of the issues...

i believe it's swept capacity is about 1300/1400 CC and puts out approx 190bhp!!


Thanks! :y  
Logged

JueV6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent
  • Posts: 1464
    • View Profile
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #61 on: 24 September 2008, 22:43:04 »

shmnbo deleted my post ;D ;D ;D
Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #62 on: 24 September 2008, 22:43:14 »

Quote

In Britain, in the 1960s, Rolls Royce Motor Car Division at Crewe, Cheshire, pioneered a two-stage Diesel version of the Wankel engine.[2]


Thanks, but what happened about the patent rights then?  Did Rolls Royce sell them on to Mazda? :-/ :-/
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #63 on: 24 September 2008, 22:46:22 »

Quote
Quote
Does anyone remember the Honda with oval pistons? (ceramic I think)
Strokers were ruling the roost & Honda came up with this 4 stroke with oval pistons, Mick Grant crashed the thing on its debut & it burst into flames, I'd bet they were pleased with him.
The Honda 6 (250 & 297) & Honda 5 (125) were light years ahead of anything in the sixties, & the Guzzi v8 was something special in the 50's also.
So far in advance of anything on 4 wheels.


NR500 - basically a 32v V8 using 4 pistons
with2 conrods per piston and iirc 2 crankshafts (?)
further to the wankel engine info-suzuki had a wankel engined road bike in the 70,s RE5 -not a huge sucess,but probably very collectable now.
« Last Edit: 24 September 2008, 22:49:27 by albitz »
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #64 on: 24 September 2008, 22:51:45 »

Some NSU RO80s are now Mazda powered
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36417
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #65 on: 24 September 2008, 23:19:28 »

Quote
i believe it's swept capacity is about 1300/1400 CC and puts out approx 190bhp!!

More like 240 BHP @ 9,000 RPM from the Jap spec models IIRC. 8-)

A little bit thirsty due to the low compression inherent in a Wankel engine (they're just begging for forced induction really).

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Mr Skrunts

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Skruntie Land.
  • Posts: 25676
  • 3.O Elite Saloon with all the toys,
    • 2003 CD 2.2 Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #66 on: 25 September 2008, 02:28:30 »

Quote
Quote
i believe it's swept capacity is about 1300/1400 CC and puts out approx 190bhp!!

More like 240 BHP @ 9,000 RPM from the Jap spec models IIRC. 8-)

A little bit thirsty due to the low compression inherent in a Wankel engine (they're just begging for forced induction really).

Kevin

2 models (specs) available in UK (Engine power wise)

RX-8 (192ps)       
RX-8 (231ps)
Logged
Ask yourself :  " WHY do I believe in what I believe?"

Remember that my opinions expressed here are not representative of the opinions of other members on the OOF Forum.

bedders

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brigg, Lincolnshire
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: Engines With A Differnce
« Reply #67 on: 25 September 2008, 08:04:45 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Wot about the Wankel?

Sorry, should have said  "Vot about the Wankel?"


Yes Jereboam, what has been the development of this "revolutionary" engine of the 1960s? :-/


I know Mazda once had the worldwide patent rights, and used it in some models, with, as understood it, problems developing on its tri-rotor contact points with the master 'cylinder / chamber'.

Was it further developed with these issue resolved?  Is it installed in any cars in 2008?  Is it still Mazda who have sole rights on it?
What, if any, are still the challenges with this engine design? :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/ :-/

 :y :y

Norton developed a highly creditable rotary engine for motorcycle racing & swept all before them for a period. All that with 3 men in an old shed somewhere, where it took £m's & hundreds of engineers in Japan to do something similar.


Some info on the Norton rotary engine.

Launched a year ago at Britain's Birmingham Show, and after a season of development held back by the dismal British summer's constant rain, the NRV588 currently produces 165 horsepower at 11,450 rpm from its liquid-cooled twin-rotor engine, yet weighs just 289 pounds with all fluids but fuel. Crighton's ultimate rotary racer offers a power-to-weight ratio comparable to today's factory superbikes, with performance enhanced by current technology that includes a ride-by-wire throttle, fuel injection with a range of usable maps and traction control. "This is the bike I wanted to build for 1995 after we'd beaten the Yamahas and Ducatis plus the RC45 Honda to win the 1994 championship," says Crighton. "I wanted fuel injection for the road bikes to cope with emissions and ride-by-wire throttle to make it easier to ride in the wet via traction control. But they changed the rules to get rid of the Nortons, and anyway the company was fizzling out, so it never got built. But [a British magazine] published an article about my ideas back in August 1994, and when Roy Richards hired me three years ago to restore all his rotary Nortons for the museum, after I'd been working for him for a while I showed him the article. After reading it he said, 'Well, would you like to build it to finish the story off?' He said that he'd finance it personally, and that's how it's come about."



Logged
Bog standard MY 2000 3.0 Elite Manual Estate + LPG
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 17 queries.