In spite of my reply above -- and slightly off topic. I personally believe that the EHC shouldn't be available from the pharmacist anyway. At the very least the recipient should be seen by her GP.
Part of the erosion of society today is caused by the removal of consequences.
Great opinion from a male!
The alternatives being unwanted children in an already stretched society!
Yes, there are consequences but accidents do happen, not everyone uses it as a regular form of contraception!
It's not the man who deals with the immediate consequences!
Plus its not always possible to see a doctor within the time scales required!
Do think it's wrong that religion comes into medicine though!
Sorry Ljay -- but you have completely gotten hold of the wrong end of the stick!
My point, badly made is, that the EHT wasn't available when most current pharmacists were trained -- therefore they are not trained to counsel and advise it's use -- GP's are!
Also a GP, who knows his patient can track their use and screen for other problems if required (stds etc in a promiscuous tenn for instance!).
I am not being "typically male" and preaching what you can or can't do with your body --- it's not my concern. But I would add ( male or female alike) you do look at these things slightly differently when you have been at the receptacle end of a Vac. Asp termination and it falls to you to catch a liquidised foetus. BUT -- that was not my point and I am not going to get into an arguement over the rights and wrongs of someones sex life.