Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.  (Read 841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« on: 09 March 2009, 17:33:49 »
 :o :o :o :o

 >:( >:( >:( >:(

Prats.. Tw?ts.. Primitives..Spider heads..Ars? heads..And  else.. >:(

A magazine for science and technics which have long years of publication past now deny evolution..Woman Manager dismissed..

What a shame..God knows what surprises we will see after.. :( :(
Logged

Pitchfork

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Tadley (near Basingrad)
  • Posts: 2498
  • Barndances & Morris
    • View Profile
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #1 on: 09 March 2009, 17:42:42 »
Is this related to a religion in any way?
Logged
Almost famous!   www.pitchforkband.co.uk Guitar & PA Amps repaired & serviced
Ears pierced while you wait. PAT & Valve testing

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #2 on: 09 March 2009, 17:45:26 »
Quote
Is this related to a religion in any way?

definitely..exactly.. and its going be a horror story if this rather govt stays more :(
Logged

amigov6

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #3 on: 09 March 2009, 17:49:35 »
They're a little late. Darwin revoked his own theory years ago.
    I stilll believe it though, makes most sense.
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #4 on: 09 March 2009, 17:52:29 »
Quote
They're a little late. Darwin revoked his own theory years ago.
    I stilll believe it though, makes most sense.

if their objection depends on scientific research its ok..

but they say all things "done in few days" ;D
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #5 on: 09 March 2009, 18:11:40 »
Morons

Very ignorant :( >:(
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #6 on: 09 March 2009, 18:17:30 »
Quote
Morons

Very ignorant :( >:(

yep..living in a seperate world with virtual borders ;D
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #7 on: 12 March 2009, 18:34:54 »
good news..  after the reactions, the spider heads retreat making some stupid explanations for excuse :D :D ;D

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090311/tpl-turkey-s-science-council-under-fire-ee974b3.html
« Last Edit: 12 March 2009, 18:37:19 by cem_devecioglu »
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #8 on: 12 March 2009, 18:46:02 »
 :y :y
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #9 on: 12 March 2009, 18:46:44 »
Quote
:y :y

 :y
Logged

holtender

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Suffolk
  • Posts: 383
    • 2.5 CDX Facelift
    • View Profile
Re: The magazine "science and Technics" reject Darwin.
« Reply #10 on: 12 March 2009, 22:57:07 »
I reckon Darwins theory is the biggest hoax of them all, that is not from the religious standpoint, just the logical.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 17 queries.