Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 or 3.0?  (Read 920 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dazzler

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Haverhill, Suffolk
  • Posts: 4198
  • Drive it like you stole it......
    • View Profile
2.5 or 3.0?
« on: 26 April 2007, 15:55:25 »

Having read a few topics on people that have put in 3.0 cams into the 2.5 and chipped them, they seem to preform better than the 3.0s even with chips in. Can this be right? I suppose the real question is should I buy a 2.5 or a 3.0 ?
Your views/comments would be most appreciated ;)
Logged
Big jobbies now finished.....Now running on LPG

Paul M

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Edinburgh
  • Posts: 1528
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 3.0?
« Reply #1 on: 26 April 2007, 16:00:05 »

Even better.... get a 2.0 8v and put the 3.2 cams in, that's the quickest of the lot :D

3.0 every time.... funnily enough it's already got the 3.0 cams ;) and there's no substitute for capacity when it comes to driveability. The 2.0 engine in the Honda S2000 produces more power than even the 3.2 Omega engine but I wouldn't fancy trying to actually use it in a car the weight on an Omega with its *peak* torque of about 145 lbft.
Logged

Paul M

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Edinburgh
  • Posts: 1528
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 3.0?
« Reply #2 on: 26 April 2007, 16:03:09 »

BTW I'd add that the gearbox is even more important than the difference between a 2.5 and 3.0... I'd take a 2.5 manual over a 3.0 slushy, but of couse with a 3.0 manual I didn't have to choose :P. These are quite peaky engines so the much lower ratios and extra gear on the manual box will make a substantial difference. Even the manual is too high geared for the engine IMO, but then again these are not performance cars, even the MV6.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 3.0?
« Reply #3 on: 26 April 2007, 18:39:03 »

Quote
BTW I'd add that the gearbox is even more important than the difference between a 2.5 and 3.0
Depends what you want from it...
Logged
Grumpy old man

theolodian

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 3654
  • I need a new avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 3.0?
« Reply #4 on: 26 April 2007, 21:38:39 »

Quote
Quote
BTW I'd add that the gearbox is even more important than the difference between a 2.5 and 3.0
Depends what you want from it...
Yeah, the Go Baby Go button makes it a real beast.  I can't imagine a manual being any faster in general use.  There are a few reasons not to get the auto, but being slow is not one of them.  The one exception is if you punch it from 20ish mph.  It will NOT kick down and takes a long time to pick up speed.
Logged
Trains may have been invented here, but public transport is a foreign concept!

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 3.0?
« Reply #5 on: 26 April 2007, 22:28:38 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
BTW I'd add that the gearbox is even more important than the difference between a 2.5 and 3.0
Depends what you want from it...
Yeah, the Go Baby Go button makes it a real beast.  I can't imagine a manual being any faster in general use.  There are a few reasons not to get the auto, but being slow is not one of them.  The one exception is if you punch it from 20ish mph.  It will NOT kick down and takes a long time to pick up speed.
I shall try my MV6 - I'm sure mine will kick into first around 20mph...

Manuals are quicker accelerating over a large range of speed due to lower ratios.  There are a few smaller ranges where the auto is quicker...
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 17 queries.