Back before the government insisted that benefits had to be paid into an account, I used to queue in postoffices to post my shite, stuck in queues (why do the great unwashed, and old people, go to the PO at lunchtime, when they have all day?), and used to watch the Bletchley Retards pick up their giro, then head straight to the lottery counter and buy their fags and lotto tickets, often £30+ (remember this was a good few years ago). I was in full time employment and couldn't afford £30 on such shite.
We have an ex-family member who did the council-house mentality of leaving school, getting up the duff, getting a council house and a lifetime of benefits. When she was moaning about benefits being cut, and how hard it was going to be for her, I did suggest she looks at employment, as her brat was (then) about 10. Her answer, quoted, "I don't see why I should have to work"
I applaud the government's plan to keep the lazy's benefits way below inflation, and pensions at inflation (ish). Its not perfect, and some who genuinely do deserve, will fall the wrong side of the rises. BUT its a step in the right direction.
Its probably a good job I'll never get voted in.
The trouble is, the politicians have to pander to the benefit scroungers, as these are now a significant proportion of the voting population. Obviously, there is a simple solution to that problem.
As to jobs, I think we in the UK have a problem in that we do not prepare our youth for work, with too much emphasis on getting the school's stats up. And we have devalued the degree so much that having one does not guarantee you can walk into a high paid job, but nobody has told the students. The vast majority of graduate interviewees that are put in front of me for job interviews are, basically, unemployable, yet think they have a right to the job on offer, and because they can run the setup wizard on their home broadband router, makes them a networking god.