Hmmm, I presumed the only reason the rearward bush is vertical is to give yaw movement given the excessive play the front oe bush can give throughout its life?
No - I'm sure its part NVH and part handling.......
Lots of NVH research points to a loose wishbone front-to-rear being the most important thing for comfort. Well, actually the hub centre being free to move a bit rearwards under bump deflection. That's part of what GM will have been trying to achieve.
From the handling side, what you really need is some automatic toe-in when cornering. This has the effect of gaining more turn than the driver thinks he needs ( or better handling to put it another way ). This is achieved as follows .......
under cornering, the outside wheel is more loaded than the inside one. The floppy vertical bush allows the wishbone to move rearwards ( see above ) It also allows the wishbone to move inwards at the back. Now think of what's happened to the outer ball joint - its moved both rearwards and inwards. Compare this to the steering tie-rod, which doesn't flex at all - you get bottem ball joint in and rearwards and steering knuckle unchanged, hence the wheel toes in slightly.
( don't even think that I came up with this one - it was down to a good mate of mine who just happens to be chief suspension designer for xxx )