Jason, I never said the fines were to be non-endorsable - let's make it the full Monty, including compulsory 3rd party insurance to cover the injusies that they are bound to inflict on pedestrians as they tear along pavements.
Are you saying that entrapment never takes place anyway? Hmmm.....
Ron.
P.S. We are on the same side, really - and great to hear that you will be a shiney-arse next week!
& how the hell would you police that then?

??
You'd have to license EVERYONE that rides a bike - from 5 yr old Billy to 80odd year old lycra clad grandad!!! Oh and get each & every offence(s) & codes passed in parliament (that's if the license even made it that far)
Oh and while we are on about entrapment as you call it :-
In criminal law, entrapment is a practice whereby a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit a criminal offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely to commit. It is a conduct that is generally discouraged and thus, in many jurisdictions, is a possible defense against criminal liability.
If someone is speeding down the road and an officer is stood 1 mile away with a speed gun how can the officer induce the person to commit the criminal act of speeding?



How can he have any impact on the driver putting his foot on the accelerator??? If he's speeding, he's speeding and would be whether the officer was there or not!