I did watch her interview a couple of weeks ago, this debate and the follow up on Megyn Kelley.
He didn't do as well as he should, and neither did she..
which says alot given the level of bias she received in the debate.
In a genuinely fair debate, ie the same treatment of both candidates, he would have beaten her as squarely as he did Biden.
No, he wouldn't, he's an idiot who is easily wound up, and no amount of spin can change that fact.
That is why Harris hasn't needed to commit herself to anything much yet. All she needs to do is provoke him into another of his somehow increasingly incoherent rants and stand back. Trump made the campaign about personality and being too old for the job, without expecting to browbeat Biden into standing down. Now he's the decrepit old has-been whose only asset is the rabble he raised 12 years ago.
Harris is hardly an imposter as she's held elected offices for years, but she still comes across as a lawyer trying to be a politician. Fortunately for her, her opponent is an idiot who doesn't realise just how bad he is at the job. Any job.
That's actually not a good thing...
Like him or loathe him most everyone on the planet knows all there is to know about Trump... Good and bad.
Kamalala on the other hand is practically a ghost. Hardly anyone knows anything about her or her policies* because she has effectively bypassed the whole process. The problem with this is that people won't vote for someone they know nothing about.
And as for Tim Walz, he makes Bernie Sanders look like a conservative Baptist preacher... that no one has ever heard of.
At least with Trump people know what to expect, and regardless of the specific numbers, most Americans feel they were better off with him as President than under Biden/Harris and that alone will probably see him reelected.
*Not entirely sure that she does either as they change as much as her accent.