Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Range Rover Engine V8  (Read 1734 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ned Kelly

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Salisbury
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Range Rover Engine V8
« on: 08 February 2009, 19:07:27 »

Hi guys,anyone know of the best size engine to go for as I have a choice of 4.0/4.4/4.6. presumably the bigger the cc the thinner the walls,and there lies a potential problem.
Thanks
Logged

Darth Loo-knee

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Death Star
  • Posts: 18826
  • Jammie smells of Pooh....
    • TIE Fighter
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #1 on: 08 February 2009, 19:20:57 »

If I remember correctly they had problems with the 4.6 as it was bored to the engines limit I read on a Range Rover forum when we had them.
Logged
Everything to do with Omega's. Breaking, Servicing from Cambelts to Oil Changes... Please Pm me for details...

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16628
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #2 on: 08 February 2009, 19:24:18 »

There is a porous block problem with one of those varients - not sure which though.....
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #3 on: 08 February 2009, 19:29:26 »

They are all the same bore (94mm), its the stroke thats different.

Porous, no not really.

The 94mm blocks do have more isues with liners dropping than the 89mm (of 3.5 Fame).

Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #4 on: 08 February 2009, 19:31:25 »

Quote
They are all the same bore (94mm), its the stroke thats different.

Porous, no not really.

The 94mm blocks do have more isues with liners dropping than the 89mm (of 3.5 Fame).


Should have added, age is a key thing here to as the block design chnged around 93ish

Whats the application?
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #5 on: 08 February 2009, 19:51:09 »

I have to ask, where is the 4.4 engine coming from as these were only ever in production in oz unless its a 3.5 with a stroker kit fitted!

For info

4.0 (its actualy a 3.95 litre engine and the same capacity as the earlier 3.9 units) - 190 Bhp - 320Nm torque

4.6 - 225 Bhp - 380Nm torque.

« Last Edit: 08 February 2009, 19:53:11 by Mark »
Logged

iainb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Midlands
  • Posts: 523
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #6 on: 08 February 2009, 19:54:00 »

Maybe latter RR with BMW  4.4 petrol
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #7 on: 08 February 2009, 19:54:33 »

Quote
Maybe latter RR with BMW  4.4 petrol

Possibly.....a VERY different beast though
Logged

iainb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Midlands
  • Posts: 523
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #8 on: 08 February 2009, 19:55:58 »

Mated to a GM 5 speed box
Logged

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #9 on: 08 February 2009, 19:56:03 »

Quote
I have to ask, where is the 4.4 engine coming from as these were only ever in production in oz unless its a 3.5 with a stroker kit fitted!

For info

4.0 (its actualy a 3.95 litre engine and the same capacity as the earlier 3.9 units) - 190 Bhp - 320Nm torque

4.6 - 225 Bhp - 380Nm torque.


i have to laugh, i can get both more power and torque out of my 2.4t after remapping and have nearly the same power as standard :P
Logged
V8!!!!

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #10 on: 08 February 2009, 20:03:34 »

Quote
Quote
I have to ask, where is the 4.4 engine coming from as these were only ever in production in oz unless its a 3.5 with a stroker kit fitted!

For info

4.0 (its actualy a 3.95 litre engine and the same capacity as the earlier 3.9 units) - 190 Bhp - 320Nm torque

4.6 - 225 Bhp - 380Nm torque.


i have to laugh, i can get both more power and torque out of my 2.4t after remapping and have nearly the same power as standard :P

Yes but, you will get a peeky horrible over blown delivery of power as a result.....the V8 would beat it in the same chassis with ease.

Remember also that the figure is that as delivered from the factory with no mods
Logged

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #11 on: 08 February 2009, 20:08:34 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
I have to ask, where is the 4.4 engine coming from as these were only ever in production in oz unless its a 3.5 with a stroker kit fitted!

For info

4.0 (its actualy a 3.95 litre engine and the same capacity as the earlier 3.9 units) - 190 Bhp - 320Nm torque

4.6 - 225 Bhp - 380Nm torque.


i have to laugh, i can get both more power and torque out of my 2.4t after remapping and have nearly the same power as standard :P

Yes but, you will get a peeky horrible over blown delivery of power as a result.....the V8 would beat it in the same chassis with ease.

Remember also that the figure is that as delivered from the factory with no mods

it's actually quite a good power delivery, the turbo comes in at 1800 revs so is there from about the revs you setoff on to when you change gear and fades towards 4000 revs
plus its 5 cylinders so really quite smooth!
the volvos 200bhp and 285nm as standard
Logged
V8!!!!

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #12 on: 08 February 2009, 20:10:39 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I have to ask, where is the 4.4 engine coming from as these were only ever in production in oz unless its a 3.5 with a stroker kit fitted!

For info

4.0 (its actualy a 3.95 litre engine and the same capacity as the earlier 3.9 units) - 190 Bhp - 320Nm torque

4.6 - 225 Bhp - 380Nm torque.


i have to laugh, i can get both more power and torque out of my 2.4t after remapping and have nearly the same power as standard :P

Yes but, you will get a peeky horrible over blown delivery of power as a result.....the V8 would beat it in the same chassis with ease.

Remember also that the figure is that as delivered from the factory with no mods

it's actually quite a good power delivery, the turbo comes in at 1800 revs so is there from about the revs you setoff on to when you change gear and fades towards 4000 revs
plus its 5 cylinders so really quite smooth!
the volvos 200bhp and 285nm as standard


Makes no odds....wind up a turbo and you compress the torque delivery curve.....

Further to this, below the point where the turbo spins you get little go, this is for two reasons

1) A restricted inlet setup due to the addition of a turbo, intercooler and miles of pipes

2) Lower compression ratio.

A car with the V8 lump would be way ahead and probably slipping int second before your boost had even arrived!

Physics mate.....its a bugger!
Logged

bertiecbx550

  • Guest
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #13 on: 08 February 2009, 20:19:02 »

Are you sure your not Mr Scott in disguise???? :o :o
Logged

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9870
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: Range Rover Engine V8
« Reply #14 on: 08 February 2009, 20:21:18 »

There's no substitute for cubic inches....
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 17 queries.