I've read all this, a little late but i've read it none the less. As most of you will know i'm no stranger to putting my foot in it, i don't sit on the fence but will hold my hands up if proved wrong. I think the manual/auto debate will rage forever & is 95% down to personal taste.
Personally i prefer dancing on 3 pedals for spirited driving & the buzz that goes with it. For pure self indulgence i can rag mine from a standstill & enjoy the wheelspin/back end skipping a little when changing from first to second in a straight line on a dry road & it's only a 2.5, so the 3.0 must be a scream.
I have however owned & enjoyed the advantages of a few autos over the years & understand how to use the box "manually"over relying on drive, sports mode & kickdown.
I'm 44 yrs. young, learned to drive in a Ford Thames van with a 3 speed colunm change @ 10 yrs old, operated all sorts of plant/forklift, ex banger racer/ non contact oval racer & now drive an artic so i can see all sides to this argument.
I still believe if the STIG took a manual then an auto MV6 for a lap each the manual would have the edge.
However sometimes at the end of a long day or embarking on a long journey i wish i was in an auto. I like the characteristics, the jump off the line, dropping it down one or two if you need more than kickdown will give & 10 times easier in traffic.
To sum up, when i bought my Mig i only had a grand to spend (no more finance!) & would still have bought it if it was auto & would love it as much as i do. Sorry to ramble on (Led Zep) but at least i'm not ranting!!!!!
