Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: V6 back pressure, is less more?  (Read 929 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

F1 9LFG

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • nr Braintree, Essex
  • Posts: 449
    • View Profile
V6 back pressure, is less more?
« on: 07 October 2010, 14:01:53 »

hi people

i have a 2.6 v6, and am building a stainless steel system, do the v6's perform better with less back pressure, i've been told different things!

most n/a motors do run better with lower back pressure, just want to know about the v6's.

cheers
Logged

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #1 on: 07 October 2010, 14:19:19 »

any engine will run better - i.e. more power - with less exhaust back-pressure.

BUT in order to do so, the fuel map has to reflect the "new" back pressure.

so yes more power, but only if you re-map the engine control.
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36393
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #2 on: 07 October 2010, 14:24:24 »

It's not really as simple as just back pressure. You will get waves of both positive and negative pressure propagating up and down the length of the exhaust as it acts like an organ pipe.

If you happen to get a negative pressure at the port on the engine as the exhaust valve is open it will help evacuate the cylinder quickly and actually draw a little more air/fuel mixture in during the valve overlap period, giving more power.

If you have a high pressure at that point, the cylinder won't evacuate well and the next combustion cycle will have exhaust fumes in the charge, giving less power.

The behaviour of the exhaust will depend on how its resonant frequency interacts with the engine at different RPM. At some RPM you will win, at others you will lose and the engine will go flat. All you can hope to do is to ensure a reasonably flat torque curve by avoiding deep resonances - or a peaky one, will all the power in one small rev range, of course, depending on the application.

So, no simple answer. Unless you're going to look in detail at the engine's cam timing, and adjust the exact length of the exhaust components to achieve some result the best you can do is make it as free flowing as possible while keeping the lengths as close as possible to the original system, which was presumably designed competently.

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #3 on: 07 October 2010, 15:35:48 »

Omega has non-resonance manifolds fitted, so the tuning aspect of the downpipes and exhaust aren't going to be an issue.
Logged

F1 9LFG

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • nr Braintree, Essex
  • Posts: 449
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #4 on: 07 October 2010, 15:52:29 »

thanks for your help there both of you, so would i need any updates appling to the ecu?

Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36393
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #5 on: 07 October 2010, 17:48:15 »

Quote
thanks for your help there both of you, so would i need any updates appling to the ecu?


I wouldn't say so. The difference in required fuel will be small enough that the ECU will compensate either by virtue of the fact that it's measuring intake airflow through the MAF or that it's correcting the fuelling based on feedback from the Lambda sensors.

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

F1 9LFG

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • nr Braintree, Essex
  • Posts: 449
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #6 on: 07 October 2010, 20:44:18 »

Quote
Quote
thanks for your help there both of you, so would i need any updates appling to the ecu?


I wouldn't say so. The difference in required fuel will be small enough that the ECU will compensate either by virtue of the fact that it's measuring intake airflow through the MAF or that it's correcting the fuelling based on feedback from the Lambda sensors.

Kevin

Just as i suspected... :-X

Thanks chaps
Logged

2woody

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Northumberland
  • Posts: 2374
    • View Profile
Re: V6 back pressure, is less more?
« Reply #7 on: 08 October 2010, 09:02:27 »

you'll be hard-pressed to notice a difference I think.

but if the new exhaust does cause it to run badly, you could always put in a restrictor plate to give it a bit of back-pressure
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 17 queries.