Now shoot me down in flames if you like. I am open to criticism on this idea.
I have just this morning done the cam belt on mothers Omega, 2.6 CDX 2003. Now I bought this car with a full service history hand written by the previous elderly owner and backed up by receipts. He also commented on what and where he got good or bad service,
The cam belt was changed at 68k in late 2008, car now has 95k. so within mileage but rapidly approaching time limit of 4 years.
Anyway stripped it all down and changed belt and tensioners all ok. Then after packing up tools I sat down with a cup of tea and the old bits. As expected there was little wrong with either belt or rollers, except a little grease loss. Then I got to thinking, as it is 99.9% of the time a roller or tensioner that fails, should I only change the rollers and keep the old belt, it is in mint condition.
I appreciate the effort is the same and the extra cost of the belt is minimal, but if I was on a tight budget I may consider it.
What do you think ? would you consider it, or dismiss it out of hand.