Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 781 KG  (Read 7927 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32356
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #15 on: 16 November 2012, 16:44:43 »

Always wanted an Austin Princess  :-X

Actually, not a bad car, and far superior to a Marina.

Mine came with an advanced ABS system. By this, I mean the brakes were so shite it was impossible to lock the wheels under any conditions. ;D
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32356
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #16 on: 16 November 2012, 16:47:04 »

Cars are larger, safer and have considerbly stiffer chassis's. Bolt on all the extra's we all must have and the result is much greater weight.

Golf Mk1  - 3.7m x 1.6m
Corsa C - 3.8m x 1.65m (hatch)

Which model is a Corsa C, Mark? ??? ???
Logged

henryd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • west cornwall
  • Posts: 8805
  • VW Touareg R5 tdi Auto
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #17 on: 16 November 2012, 16:49:21 »

Always wanted an Austin Princess  :-X

Actually, not a bad car, and far superior to a Marina.

Mine came with an advanced ABS system. By this, I mean the brakes were so shite it was impossible to lock the wheels under any conditions. ;D

I had an ambassador 1.7 HL once :-[ :-X
Logged
other rides 
  mk3 Volvo v70 2.0 Diesel ,Citroen C2, Pug 306 cabriolet
  Sterling elite trekker pikey wagon

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #18 on: 16 November 2012, 16:49:30 »

Always wanted an Austin Princess  :-X

Actually, not a bad car, and far superior to a Marina.

Mine came with an advanced ABS system. By this, I mean the brakes were so shite it was impossible to lock the wheels under any conditions. ;D

My mates dad had one for years and was used as a private hire taxi , sure it was ex-police  :-\
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #19 on: 16 November 2012, 16:52:22 »

Cars are larger, safer and have considerbly stiffer chassis's. Bolt on all the extra's we all must have and the result is much greater weight.

Golf Mk1  - 3.7m x 1.6m
Corsa C - 3.8m x 1.65m (hatch)

Which model is a Corsa C, Mark? ??? ???

The last one, Corsa D (current) is bigger still (4m x 1.7m)

Interestingly, Brazil id full of Corsa saloons, something we never had in europe
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32356
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #20 on: 16 November 2012, 16:57:01 »

Always wanted an Austin Princess  :-X

Actually, not a bad car, and far superior to a Marina.

Mine came with an advanced ABS system. By this, I mean the brakes were so shite it was impossible to lock the wheels under any conditions. ;D

My mates dad had one for years and was used as a private hire taxi , sure it was ex-police  :-\


I seem to recall that my Princess  had something called "Displacers"......I've no idea what they did.....or what they were. :-\
Logged

Entwood

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Wiltshire
  • Posts: 19566
  • My Old 3.2 V6 Elite (LPG)
    • Audi A6 Allroad 3.0 DTI
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #21 on: 16 November 2012, 16:58:47 »

Always wanted an Austin Princess  :-X

Actually, not a bad car, and far superior to a Marina.

Mine came with an advanced ABS system. By this, I mean the brakes were so shite it was impossible to lock the wheels under any conditions. ;D

Marina's weren't that bad .. I had the TC Coupe with the 1800 engine, same as the MGB, bit of tweaking and they went pretty well (didn't stop very well .. but went .....  ). Back seat was very comfortable
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #22 on: 16 November 2012, 17:04:37 »

If i bought another classic it would be a TR7 with V8 conversion , nice and light with some decent power on tap  :P :P
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #23 on: 16 November 2012, 17:09:03 »

If i bought another classic it would be a TR7 with V8 conversion , nice and light with some decent power on tap  :P :P

Ah yes the car that shed weight weekly as it rusted away  ;D

Not to hot with that power either!
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #24 on: 16 November 2012, 17:17:16 »

Cars are larger, safer and have considerbly stiffer chassis's. Bolt on all the extra's we all must have and the result is much greater weight.

Golf Mk1  - 3.7m x 1.6m
Corsa C - 3.8m x 1.65m (hatch)

Which model is a Corsa C, Mark? ??? ???

The last one, Corsa D (current) is bigger still (4m x 1.7m)

Interestingly, Brazil id full of Corsa saloons, something we never had in europe

We did have the Nova saloon though.My dad bought a brand new one in chocolate brown for some unknown reason. :)

I noticed something about the weight of cars recently.My trolley jack doesnt normally go under the sill of an Omega.I have to lift the car about an inch and then kick the jack under.This was the case with the Omega Im dismantling until I removed the interior and a few other parts.Then the jack went straight under the sill without lifting the car,so the weight of the interior and a few other bits allowed it to rise up a good inch on the suspension.
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32356
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #25 on: 16 November 2012, 17:18:39 »

If i bought another classic it would be a TR7 with V8 conversion , nice and light with some decent power on tap  :P :P


Sorry, EMD.......but the TR7 was a hairdresser's car. :-* :-*

However, I still lust after a TR6. :y :y
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #26 on: 16 November 2012, 17:23:30 »

If i bought another classic it would be a TR7 with V8 conversion , nice and light with some decent power on tap  :P :P


Sorry, EMD.......but the TR7 was a hairdresser's car. :-* :-*

However, I still lust after a TR6. :y :y


Nurse!  :y :y :y
Logged

henryd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • west cornwall
  • Posts: 8805
  • VW Touareg R5 tdi Auto
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #27 on: 16 November 2012, 17:24:54 »

If i bought another classic it would be a TR7 with V8 conversion , nice and light with some decent power on tap  :P :P


Sorry, EMD.......but the TR7 was a hairdresser's car. :-* :-*

However, I still lust after a TR6. :y :y

I think the last Tr5's are prettier than the 6's :y
Logged
other rides 
  mk3 Volvo v70 2.0 Diesel ,Citroen C2, Pug 306 cabriolet
  Sterling elite trekker pikey wagon

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 33982
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #28 on: 16 November 2012, 17:30:49 »

If i bought another classic it would be a TR7 with V8 conversion , nice and light with some decent power on tap  :P :P


Sorry, EMD.......but the TR7 was a hairdresser's car. :-* :-*

However, I still lust after a TR6. :y :y

I think the last Tr5's are prettier than the 6's :y

yes but that straight six engine with the (intersting if not troublesome) fuel injection!
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 781 KG
« Reply #29 on: 16 November 2012, 17:32:44 »

I reckon it's a conspiracy involving the car makers and steel plants! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;)

let me add more.. heavy cars consume more fuel ;) ;D ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 17 queries.