2000 X Reg 2.5 V6 Elite Estate
Drives like a pig compared with my previous 2.6 V6 Estates. I understand that there are differences like weight, drive-by-wire, but I think that the real problem is 17" alloys instead of 16". OK there may be geometry issues, but probably wheel size is the main culprit. I really don't care that some people think that 17" looks better
I need a complete set of new tyres, not exactly a cheap matter. Before I do this . . .
Is there any reason for NOT getting a second hand set of 16" Alloys ?
It's not that simple. You could go to the expense of new wheels, only to find its the set up, or a component at fault on the bad handling car. Or the tyres themselves, maybe?
What's it doing?
What tyres fitted?
Bush history/condition?
Set up history?
Ps, if you want to confirm its a wheel or tyre issue, fit the good handling wheels to the bad handling car. But you need to be aware of the tread wear on each set.
For instance if the bad handling cars tyres are new, and the good handling cars tyres are old/worn. That would NOT be worth while swapping wheels, as you could just be confirming a worn set of tyres.
However if the opposite is true and the older tyres handle better than the bad handling new ones then you have a tyre selection problem. Just as an example.

I'd be surprised if just rim size could be picked put as a fault by simply driving the car? If I understand your post correctly?
