Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: EM Code Reader - Which one to buy?  (Read 1164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Andy2009

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Norwich
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
EM Code Reader - Which one to buy?
« on: 03 February 2013, 15:32:58 »
Hi

Does anyone have an opinion on which enging management code reader I should buy please?

I have a 2002(52) Omega 2.2 petrol saloon

I have seen a number of them on Amazon with prices from about £25 upwards.

Unfortunately, none of them provide a list of compatible cars in their advert so I am not sure which one will meet my needs.

Any advice would be gratefully received.

 :)
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107318
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: EM Code Reader - Which one to buy?
« Reply #1 on: 03 February 2013, 15:38:27 »
There is an FAQ in the FAQ section :)
Logged
Grumpy old man

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107318
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: EM Code Reader - Which one to buy?
« Reply #2 on: 03 February 2013, 15:39:52 »
Logged
Grumpy old man

steve6367

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1613
    • View Profile
Re: EM Code Reader - Which one to buy?
« Reply #3 on: 05 February 2013, 09:40:04 »
I have this http://www.enginecheck.co.uk/

Seems to work well for diagnostics - its not a Tech 2 but then its a fraction of the cost.

For me I liked the fact it works will post 2001 petrol / Post 2004 diesel so that when the Omega dies I should be able to use it on any repalcement.
Logged
2.2 CDX Estate (broken), 2.5 CD Salon, 2.5 CD Estate LPG
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 16 queries.