.... or we're all board of the subject. Perhaps not surprisingly.
.....
very bored! 
...yes had enough too. But if we're to get to the bottom of it we need to carry on just a fraction longer.
Currently working on the idea, that all of the stability problems we've seen on omega tyres have been on the lower load ratings.
So, IF this is the case, it might be prudent to suggest that a load of 95 or 97 and above,(96 seem rare for some reason) would most likely see less instances of directional stability problems, and therefor save members money and give a more stable safer car. ..."IF" !
Looking at Falkens sizes on their web site, they no longer list 92 load tyres in the sizes that fit omega. 93 and 94 are listed. The only 97 is on 18" 265/35. Iirc.
We know 92 is too low anyway, as VX recomend 93 and above apparently. Tuere are two 92 load Falkens just fome off omegas that i know of, my mv6 in 17" and Tunnies 2.2 in 16". There are obviously exceptions, like sc3 mo 245/40/18 are a 93 load and are very stable. But we are looking to achieve a better average performance, or, raise the peak operating window so we are less likely to catch the odd rogue manufacturers tyre that plays up and tram lines/wanders.
While its dull stuff, it is useful and helpful to get this nailed down. Apart from anything else, we can enjoy the airfield meet more if it happens, instead if pishing about with tests.
Apologies. But can we bare with it a little while longer....?
Author
Topic: Reports in tyres with 95 load rating please (Read 2056 times)