Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: E36 316  (Read 2344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

omega3000

  • Guest
E36 316
« on: 17 March 2013, 19:22:21 »

Good or bad  :-\ Or very bad ?
Logged

Selseybill

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • La Rochelle
  • Posts: 702
    • 2.0 pre face, 2.2 CDX est
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #1 on: 17 March 2013, 19:49:45 »

Watch out for plastic vanes on the water pump. They seem to break with age. Cheap to replace with the metal type but a sod to bled.
I've had a couple of 1.6/1.8 in the past both blew their head gaskets.
Logged

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #2 on: 17 March 2013, 19:54:57 »

Underpowered, and the E36 isn't that nice unless it's an M3  :y.
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #3 on: 17 March 2013, 19:56:25 »

Watch out for plastic vanes on the water pump. They seem to break with age. Cheap to replace with the metal type but a sod to bled.
I've had a couple of 1.6/1.8 in the past both blew their head gaskets.

Not a good sign then , best to look over the obvious then first for signs of gasket failure . Just browsing but there is one local to me that has been owned a good few years by the same owner . Mite take a look  :)
Logged

Selseybill

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • La Rochelle
  • Posts: 702
    • 2.0 pre face, 2.2 CDX est
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #4 on: 17 March 2013, 20:05:50 »

The straight 6 cylinder engines much better which you can get in the 3 series. Smoother and no head problems.
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #5 on: 17 March 2013, 20:10:38 »

Any reason why head gaskets fail ?
Logged

Selseybill

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • La Rochelle
  • Posts: 702
    • 2.0 pre face, 2.2 CDX est
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #6 on: 17 March 2013, 20:12:22 »

water pump and overheating. Alloy head warps and will need a skim if overheated
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #7 on: 17 March 2013, 20:23:13 »

water pump and overheating

First thing to check and replace then  ;) Need to get something straight though , which of the cars have the 6 cylinder in this model ? Is it the 2.0 and above ? Like del was saying i think the 1.6 will be under powered  :-\
Logged

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #8 on: 17 March 2013, 20:33:27 »

The E36 I use to have was a 2.5TDSE great run around, good on fuel, will agree with the others if it has to be petrol then go for the 6 pot.
Logged

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #9 on: 17 March 2013, 20:38:22 »

water pump and overheating

First thing to check and replace then  ;) Need to get something straight though , which of the cars have the 6 cylinder in this model ? Is it the 2.0 and above ? Like del was saying i think the 1.6 will be under powered  :-\

Anything 320i and above has a 6 Cylinder engine  :y.
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

Selseybill

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • La Rochelle
  • Posts: 702
    • 2.0 pre face, 2.2 CDX est
    • View Profile
Re: E36 316
« Reply #10 on: 17 March 2013, 20:43:54 »

1.6/1.8 a bit gutless 4cyl. Go for 2.0 6cyl upwards best. 2.3/2.5 more or less the same engine. 2.8 engine gets the same mpg as the 2.3/2.5. Diesel 2.5 TD pulls really well in the 3 series.
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #11 on: 17 March 2013, 21:12:16 »

Ok thanks all , why so many of these cars located in london  ;D 2.5TD seems out my price range just now and not that many 2.0 . Have not searched for 2.8 but if it gets same mpg as 2.3 2.5 may as well gander .
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #12 on: 17 March 2013, 21:16:54 »

EMD any omega with any engine is better than a 1.6 E36..  and avg maintenance costs are higher than the omega even with a small engine..
 
 
and most E36s now are for sale with a high cost behind..
« Last Edit: 17 March 2013, 21:20:51 by cem »
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #13 on: 17 March 2013, 21:25:16 »

Ok , i have a couple 328 in my watch list . Just testing the water to see how much they go for  :)
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: E36 316
« Reply #14 on: 17 March 2013, 21:33:14 »

Ok , i have a couple 328 in my watch list . Just testing the water to see how much they go for  :)

yeah.. 328 will be worth the cost..  :y
 
imo buy a manual ..
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 16 queries.