Firstly, I am surprised that nobody has started this evil story on this wonderful forum.
Anyway I will kick off,
How come that those a******s can get away with basically killing their own children, all six of them and get max 17 years for the mother and her (friend!) and your man getting more or less the same but with a review in a few years time.
I have something here that would solve the problem in an instant. Eh!! three instances.
These people in my opinion should not be allowed to breath our air.
It goes to show how this once wonderful country of ours has gone down the tubes this past few years.
I am old enough to remember that (ONE) murder in the UK would bring a front page news on most of the national newspapers and bringing a national abhorrence to that particular deed.
Moral compass my arse!!
they were all tried for manslaughter not murder for some reason???...as he started the fire to get a bigger/better council house which in turn murdered 6 young children..as far as i am concerned bring back hanging...he can be the first with the other two following him....chav....as is Council Housed And Vile thats is where the term comes from ...emphasis on the vile
Whether we like it or not .. he started the fire with the intention of "rescuing" the kids to make him look good .. he did NOT start the fire with the intention of killing the kids.
Murder, by definition, is the premeditated intention to kill ... clearly not the case, so the best he could be charged with is manslaughter, where actions (or lack of) cause unintentional death.
The major difference between the majority of decent folks and this "man", and what makes us decent people, is the adherence to the laws of both the land and of humanity, sometimes the results may not be what we wish .. but we abide by, and enforce, those laws.
So in this case the law says manslaughter not murder, and we must accept that or we become like him - self serving and selfish.