Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Power  (Read 2213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pauls

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • By the sea minehead
  • Posts: 2091
    • Bmw x3
    • View Profile
Power
« on: 29 November 2013, 18:23:43 »

As I seem to be on a roll today for asking questions here's another one just to bore you some more. (sorry day off work and to much coffee) ;D ;D

If I do decide to keep my 2.6 is they anyway to increase low down power eg 0 to 60.

I have already dropped 3ltr cams in it but this is only noticiable at the top end of the rev range. Any thing else that will just drop in.

Cant drop a 3ltr or 3.2ltr engine in not cost effective.

Logged
..

albitz

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #1 on: 29 November 2013, 18:40:09 »

3.2 should be a straight swap I would imagine. Although you would need the engine ECU, AR35 box, and possibly diff to go with it.
Had you asked about this a couple of months ago I had a good 3.2 engine with ECU etc and AR 35 box here that could have been yours for  £300. ::)
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #2 on: 29 November 2013, 18:47:38 »

Proper gearbox might help matters :-\ 3.2 ECU should be plug and play, might make it sit up a bit  :y
Logged

Nick W

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Chatham, Kent
  • Posts: 11067
    • Ghastly 1.0l Focus
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #3 on: 29 November 2013, 19:33:12 »

Surely a 3.0 or 3.2l engine is the most cost effective thing you could do? After all you only need a bare engine, which is £200-£300.
Logged

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #4 on: 29 November 2013, 19:57:50 »

Chipping the ecu will liberate around 10-12 bhp and offer a more flexible drive. My 2.5 was chipped.
Logged

martin42

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #5 on: 29 November 2013, 20:15:13 »

Why not fit a 50bhp wet nitrous system with controller
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #6 on: 29 November 2013, 20:29:40 »

Or just fit a 3.2 ecu ::)

Car already has 3.0 cams and better flowing manifolds, only need the key chip, transponder and alarm ecu to make it run :y
« Last Edit: 29 November 2013, 20:31:28 by ex taxi al »
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #7 on: 29 November 2013, 20:43:01 »

Proper gearbox might help matters :-\ 3.2 ECU should be plug and play, might make it sit up a bit  :y

yep.. proper gearbox.. drop a manual in. although not that stratightforward.. 0-60 around 1.3-1.4 secs faster .. and if your diff is 4.22 time difference will be higher
« Last Edit: 29 November 2013, 20:44:57 by cem »
Logged

pauls

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • By the sea minehead
  • Posts: 2091
    • Bmw x3
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #8 on: 29 November 2013, 20:53:33 »

Or just fit a 3.2 ecu ::)

Car already has 3.0 cams and better flowing manifolds, only need the key chip, transponder and alarm ecu to make it run :y

How does that help.......
Logged
..

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #9 on: 29 November 2013, 20:56:08 »

I was under the impression a 3.2 ecu in to a 2.6 wouldn't make any difference? :)
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #10 on: 29 November 2013, 21:01:08 »

Or just fit a 3.2 ecu ::)

Car already has 3.0 cams and better flowing manifolds, only need the key chip, transponder and alarm ecu to make it run :y

How does that help.......
The Engine ECU is coded to the rest, won't fire without it :y not sure the alarm ecu is entirely neccesary thinking about it :-\
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Power
« Reply #11 on: 29 November 2013, 21:01:38 »

I was under the impression a 3.2 ecu in to a 2.6 wouldn't make any difference? :)
Quick and easy way to find out ::)
Logged

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #12 on: 29 November 2013, 21:10:08 »

I enquired about it but was told it wouldn't make any difference unless someone can say otherwise. Hence why I had a chipped ecu instead.  ???
Logged

RobG

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol
  • Posts: 13831
  • I might have a link, pic or part number for that
    • 16 plate Mokka. Vivaro
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #13 on: 29 November 2013, 21:20:44 »

Chipping the ecu will liberate around 10-12 bhp and offer a more flexible drive. My 2.5 was chipped.
Not possible on the 2.6/3.2 ;)
Logged
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

UPVC windows/doors/fascias/soffit/gutters supplied/fitted

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Power
« Reply #14 on: 29 November 2013, 21:29:39 »

Just on the 2.5 and 3.0 then.  :D cheers. Take it they can be remapped still.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 17 queries.