Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?  (Read 2751 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34014
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #15 on: 20 December 2013, 08:30:08 »

If the engineers wanted to be really clever, the could incorporate the cam lobes onto the crank with four pushrods, 2 inlet and 2 exhaust, with one of each either side of the conrods. Alternatively you could have two gear driven cams, one either side of the crank

That would be a miracle on a four stroke
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32550
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #16 on: 20 December 2013, 10:45:15 »

I seem to recall that the  Honda VF 750 from the eighties came with gear driven cams. :)

.....so why are we still using belts and chains today?
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #17 on: 20 December 2013, 11:10:19 »

If the engineers wanted to be really clever, the could incorporate the cam lobes onto the crank with four pushrods, 2 inlet and 2 exhaust, with one of each either side of the conrods. Alternatively you could have two gear driven cams, one either side of the crank

That would be a miracle on a four stroke
Ok do away with cam timing altogether...

A sensor either side of the crank for each cylinder, one exhaust and one intake, each sending a pulse to the ECU. In turn the ECU fires the appropriate solenoid to open or close the valves as required. Infinite valve timing based on fuel/air demands, four valves per cylinder - a solenoid for each one... if a solenoid fails engine can still run at a reduced level. If the engine is designed 'safe' then a total electrical melt down won't destroy it.

Exhaust sensor timing could act as a cross reference for the intake timing and vice versa, so again, if a sensor fails, the engine still runs...

Obviously only as good as the person programming it... but should be alot lighter and alot more efficient  :-\
Logged

Webby the Bear

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 12729
    • 2000 (W Reg.) 2.5 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #18 on: 20 December 2013, 11:25:37 »

My teacher was ex Audi and VW so in our lessons we get a lot of Audi material including this stuff. As peeps have pointed out..... all the way at the back of the engine with 3 or 4 chains. I have no idea, from an engineering point of view whether it's good or bad, but I know I wouldn't like to be the technician having to replace them  :o :o :o :o :o
Logged
RIP Paul Lovejoy

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #19 on: 20 December 2013, 11:28:08 »

Or the person paying for it :-\
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34014
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #20 on: 20 December 2013, 11:39:25 »

Its this issue currently causing issues with the 4 pot beemer diesels.

As for the electronic actuated valve train, its not so far off, already being done by Sulzer on large marine diesels.

Only needs a crank sensor to do this (remember that cam runs at half crank speed on a 4 stroke  :y)
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #21 on: 20 December 2013, 11:53:00 »

A pair of sensors for each cylinder might complicate things but will give more precise control and add in a degree of redundancy just in case :y
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36417
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #22 on: 20 December 2013, 11:57:23 »

A pair of sensors for each cylinder might complicate things but will give more precise control and add in a degree of redundancy just in case :y

The GM crank sensor has 60 teeth, so the ECU gets an update every 6 degrees of rotation as it is ( potentially 3 degrees if it triggers on both edges). You can happily do a linear interpolation between crank sensor events because the speed won't change much in 6 degrees of rotation, so I'd say there's no need for more sensors.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #23 on: 20 December 2013, 12:17:39 »

Its this issue currently causing issues with the 4 pot beemer diesels.

As for the electronic actuated valve train, its not so far off, already being done by Sulzer on large marine diesels.

Only needs a crank sensor to do this (remember that cam runs at half crank speed on a 4 stroke  :y)
I was amazed how slow the cams actually turned, when we where struggling with TB's gravel chomping rusty bullit engine. Cranking the engine with the cam covers off I was expecting oil to be flung everywhere. But no, they turn surprisingly slowly.
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #24 on: 20 December 2013, 13:27:00 »

A pair of sensors for each cylinder might complicate things but will give more precise control and add in a degree of redundancy just in case :y

The GM crank sensor has 60 teeth, so the ECU gets an update every 6 degrees of rotation as it is ( potentially 3 degrees if it triggers on both edges). You can happily do a linear interpolation between crank sensor events because the speed won't change much in 6 degrees of rotation, so I'd say there's no need for more sensors.
Well that's the bottom end sorted :y Would a 3mm headgasket be enough to ensure top end clearance? I know this would drop the compression ratio, but that rather conveniently opens up the avenue of forced induction...
Logged

omega3000

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #25 on: 20 December 2013, 14:17:25 »

Engine out jobby, no problemo . Now how would you like to pay for that sir  :D
Logged

Andy H

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Auckland
  • Posts: 5533
    • Mazda MPV
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #26 on: 20 December 2013, 14:41:43 »

I seem to recall that the  Honda VF 750 from the eighties came with gear driven cams. :)

.....so why are we still using belts and chains today?
The Honda VF750 had a cam chain, was moderately unreliable (it used to eat cams) and had a reputation for being a bit of a slug. Honda were so embarrassed that they went all out to rebuild their reputation by developing (at great expense) the VF750R racer and VFR750 road bike.

I had a VFR750, I used to commute 18,000 miles a year on it. Almost indestructible (a lorry reversed over mine  ::)).

The gears were an engineering marvel and reputably cost a fortune to make. They made a very distinctive whine which I found quite adictive :y
Logged
"Deja Moo - The feeling that you've heard this bull somewhere before."

andyc

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Norfolk
  • Posts: 1273
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #27 on: 21 December 2013, 10:56:25 »

What make me laugh is in the V8 Supercars you now have Merc & Nissan who have spent thousands on quad cam, multi valve all singing all dancing engines and the old pushrod motors from Ford & GM are still beating them

Had i better no say that the new engines from GM are also rear chained

Andy
Logged
Iceni Automotive. Classic Vauxhall/Opel Specialist. Service, Repairs, Restoration
Thetford. Norfolk

Rods2

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sandhurst Berkshire
  • Posts: 7604
    • 1999 3.0 Elite Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #28 on: 22 December 2013, 19:02:20 »

What is wrong with using hi-vo chains like many motorbikes do and that are designed to last the life of the engine. They are much, much stronger than conventional chains.  :y :y :y :y
Logged
US Fracking and Saudi Arabia defending its market share = The good news of an oil glut, lower and lower prices for us and squeaky bum time for Putin!

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Thought an V6 cambelt was a bit of a faff ?
« Reply #29 on: 23 December 2013, 07:44:22 »

I seem to recall that the  Honda VF 750 from the eighties came with gear driven cams. :)

.....so why are we still using belts and chains today?
The Honda VF750 had a cam chain, was moderately unreliable (it used to eat cams) and had a reputation for being a bit of a slug. Honda were so embarrassed that they went all out to rebuild their reputation by developing (at great expense) the VF750R racer and VFR750 road bike.

I had a VFR750, I used to commute 18,000 miles a year on it. Almost indestructible (a lorry reversed over mine  ::)).

The gears were an engineering marvel and reputably cost a fortune to make. They made a very distinctive whine which I found quite adictive :y
The rc45. Very expensive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_RVF750_RC45
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 17 queries.