Regardless of the conditions of the moment, history has always taught us that torture gives you nothing valuable in terms of Intel and only problems in the cold light of day......Studies of numerous historical military conflicts will confirm this to anyone with half a brain.
It is the fear of the unknown which drives the desire to resort to such measures and displays a certain lack of moral courage to concede to that base instinct rather than thinking rationally and taking decisions with an educated, analytical mind.
Ah, so we come down to management being "fit for purpose" again. In very general terms of course. Rarely have I encounteted individuals worthy of, well.....leadership, I suppose, even ignoring situations where the shit really has hit the fan.
I can't imagine the pressure these people encounteted during the events of 911.
But how far to take this moral fibre? Much as I feel he deserved it, how does the report on torture balance with the shooting, or even murder, of OBL? Don't get me wrong, nobody is complaining, but that can't really be justified either, can it? Rush the house, shoot him dead, take the body, identify him. Lob the body over board. Is that legal?