Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.2 Omega's  (Read 2683 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

steve6367

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1613
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #15 on: 19 March 2015, 21:01:04 »

When mine went I was going to scrap it but oof got me through  :y

Certainly between by 2.2 & 2.5 they both have ups and downs.
Logged
2.2 CDX Estate (broken), 2.5 CD Salon, 2.5 CD Estate LPG

the alarming man

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • medway kent
  • Posts: 3644
    • disco V8
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #16 on: 19 March 2015, 23:19:09 »

terby mine got sold on because my head gasket went....I know no drama in changing and now wish I had kept it but hind sight is a great thing
Logged
'the more people i meet...the more i like the dog'

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #17 on: 20 March 2015, 11:07:17 »

So I have a 2.2 manual and a 3.2 auto, so having biggest gap in terms of performance and DIY work ect.

Headgaskets, yes they fail, but this for me is down to coolant service. My 2.2 is on 179.2k and it's on it's original head gasket. FatherT's 2.2's HG failed at 99k, but that was dealer serviced in it's first 100k (was a fleet car)

I'm on my 3rd exhaust flexi, original GM one failing not long after 100k, new one lasted 60k (from Camskill) - It's also had one cam sensor change, again at around 100k and it's cam cover has been done once, again funnily enough at 100k miles. It's had a new stat too, but can't remember when. Well over 100k though. Usual suspension stuff, wishbones, shocks ect.

The 2.2 is a pleasure to work on in the engine bay, soooo much room. Cam cover is a really nice easy job, as is stat and cambelt.

It's never let me down and even after abused in London for a couple of years and services slightly neglected, I took it to Austria and back and never missed a beat.

The 3.2 so far, has yet to put a foot wrong either. It's had new exhaust, wishbones ect. But it's going fine, it's a different beast to the 2.2 though, much more effortless on the commute. Though not on the wallet!

My 2.2 has a far smoother idle though and less engine noise, you are not going to win any races in the 2.2, but it's actually more relaxing to drive. Because I know I won't win, I don't bother. In the 3.2, because I could challenge most things, I don't relax as much   ;D

Also because the 2.2 lacks power, it saves the rear tyres. 30k is easily achievable. I got 48k out of my first set, which came with the car! The 3.2, going to be lucky to get 12k....
Logged

ronnyd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
  • Posts: 9225
    • Vectra 1.8 SRI Silver
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #18 on: 20 March 2015, 16:43:17 »

Perhaps a bit off topic, but is the PFL 2.0l engine considered more robust than the 2.2? as i had no issues at all with my old 94 barge. What ya think.
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #19 on: 20 March 2015, 17:12:28 »

Perhaps a bit off topic, but is the PFL 2.0l engine considered more robust than the 2.2? as i had no issues at all with my old 94 barge. What ya think.
The 8 valve lump may well be as it is less complicated :-\
Logged

ronnyd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
  • Posts: 9225
    • Vectra 1.8 SRI Silver
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #20 on: 20 March 2015, 19:18:36 »

Perhaps a bit off topic, but is the PFL 2.0l engine considered more robust than the 2.2? as i had no issues at all with my old 94 barge. What ya think.
The 8 valve lump may well be as it is less complicated :-\
No, mine was a 94 16valve.
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #21 on: 20 March 2015, 19:49:25 »

Just lucky then I guess... But frequent, comprehensive maintenance goes a very long way... :y
Logged

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9874
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #22 on: 20 March 2015, 20:23:25 »

Just lucky then I guess... But frequent, comprehensive maintenance goes a very long way... :y
...and that be why they (and any other 10 year old car) dying, no one except enthusiasts and keen home mechanics would spend any money on a £500 car to keep it well maintained....
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #23 on: 20 March 2015, 20:26:08 »

Tru dat :'(
Logged

ronnyd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
  • Posts: 9225
    • Vectra 1.8 SRI Silver
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 Omega's
« Reply #24 on: 21 March 2015, 13:05:12 »

Just lucky then I guess... But frequent, comprehensive maintenance goes a very long way... :y
...and that be why they (and any other 10 year old car) dying, no one except enthusiasts and keen home mechanics would spend any money on a £500 car to keep it well maintained....

Yeah, very true. Did oil and coolant changes religiously on time and had no engine problems in the 7+ years i had it.
Still rusted away in the end though, :D
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.009 seconds with 17 queries.