Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto  (Read 8497 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8610
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #30 on: 07 March 2016, 21:01:28 »

.....


Auto's / town work are nice if somebody else is paying the fuel bill  ;D

but do you buy a 3.2 V6 for fuel economy? ;) My diesel isn't much different from my 3.0 Omega economy wise ..... but hardly unexpected for a 2300kg permanent 4 wheel drive

But your fuel spend at the moment is precisely zero ... which is way better than mine even on LPG .. but then again .. I can actually drive mine ..  ;D ;D ;D

(sorry .... couldn't resist it !!  :)  )


Bitchy Nigel, bitchy      ;D ;D ;D
Logged

korum

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Derby
  • Posts: 192
    • 2003 3.2 Irmscher MV6
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #31 on: 09 March 2016, 18:01:11 »

Keeping the 2.6 diff will make it quicker off the line, but at a price... at 70 it will be pulling an extra 500rpm... which will mean increased consumption, noise and wear...

Your choice, but choose carefully :y

Yes I have left the 2.6 diff on my 3.2 conversion and using the launch control does make it quick off the lights though you need to be more careful in the wet stuff ;D
Logged

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11436
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #32 on: 09 March 2016, 18:36:45 »

Keeping the 2.6 diff will make it quicker off the line, but at a price... at 70 it will be pulling an extra 500rpm... which will mean increased consumption, noise and wear...

Your choice, but choose carefully :y

Yes I have left the 2.6 diff on my 3.2 conversion and using the launch control does make it quick off the lights though you need to be more careful in the wet stuff ;D
As said though, your be pulling about 3000rpm at 70 (probably true speed of about 67mph) which can be a be daunting on a Motorway cruise.
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #33 on: 09 March 2016, 20:26:20 »

Keeping the 2.6 diff will make it quicker off the line, but at a price... at 70 it will be pulling an extra 500rpm... which will mean increased consumption, noise and wear...

Your choice, but choose carefully :y

Yes I have left the 2.6 diff on my 3.2 conversion and using the launch control does make it quick off the lights though you need to be more careful in the wet stuff ;D
As said though, your be pulling about 3000rpm at 70 (probably true speed of about 67mph) which can be a be oppsing annoying on a Motorway cruise.
Fixed ::)
Logged

Broomies Mate

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol, UK
  • Posts: 3840
    • Stuff!
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #34 on: 10 March 2016, 01:35:36 »

Forgive me, but the Manual gear change in the Omega is woeful.  It's bloody terrible.

The car wasn't designed to be a B Road hack, it was designed to be a cruiser.  It handles like a soggy sack of fish........ why would anyone want a Manual Omega?  :-*

I really wish the UK market got the later 5 speed Auto transmission.  They are a joy to drive.
Logged
2004 Saab 9-5 Aero Merlot Red Stg1 noobtune
2009 Saab 9-5 Turbo Edition Titan Grey Stg3 noobtune
2017 Vauxhall Vivaro L1H1 125PS Star Silver

EMD

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Noofhampton
  • Posts: 3516
    • 95t
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #35 on: 10 March 2016, 11:48:57 »

Forgive me, but the Manual gear change in the Omega is woeful.  It's bloody terrible.

The car wasn't designed to be a B Road hack, it was designed to be a cruiser.  It handles like a soggy sack of fish........ why would anyone want a Manual Omega?  :-*

I really wish the UK market got the later 5 speed Auto transmission.  They are a joy to drive.

I didnt think it was that bad  :D ;D Elite's seem to be the worst for handling imo but like you say they were never designed to be thrown around .
Logged
Omegatitis

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8610
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #36 on: 10 March 2016, 13:14:54 »

Forgive me, but the Manual gear change in the Omega is woeful.  It's bloody terrible.

The car wasn't designed to be a B Road hack, it was designed to be a cruiser.  It handles like a soggy sack of fish........ why would anyone want a Manual Omega?  :-*

I really wish the UK market got the later 5 speed Auto transmission.  They are a joy to drive.

I didnt think it was that bad  :D ;D Elite's seem to be the worst for handling imo but like you say they were never designed to be thrown around .




Nothing wrong with a manual box on a omega.
3rd can be a bit of a bitch when cold and the throw is a bit long but other then that, no problem  ;)

As for the elite
Only ever driven one and that was gixers old gold one with the lpg tank where the spare wheel went ...............
Chucked it into a corner and nearly shit myself  :D
Could never live with a elite unless all roads was straight and if you came to a corner you had your man in front with a red flag  :P :D :D
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32358
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #37 on: 10 March 2016, 13:21:42 »

Whatever the speed range a 3.2 auto will piss all over a 2.6 manual. I've owned both. :y

The manual gearbox on the 2.6 manual is so agricultural it was probably made for Vauxhall by Massey Ferguson. Quick shifting it is not.
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32358
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #38 on: 10 March 2016, 13:25:37 »

Rumour has it that the boys from 'Ice Road Truckers' speak highly of the manual box from the Omega. ::) ::) ::) :)
Logged

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8610
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #39 on: 10 March 2016, 13:31:58 »

Whatever the speed range a 3.2 auto will piss all over a 2.6 manual. I've owned both. :y

The manual gearbox on the 2.6 manual is so agricultural it was probably made for Vauxhall by Massey Ferguson. Quick shifting it is not.



What about a 3.2 with the autos diff  :D :D

Anyway, if the tenna pants wearing members of OOF ain't man enough to move the gearstick and press another pedal  ::)  :-* :-* :D

I await the abuse  :P :P
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32358
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #40 on: 10 March 2016, 13:46:55 »

Whatever the speed range a 3.2 auto will piss all over a 2.6 manual. I've owned both. :y

The manual gearbox on the 2.6 manual is so agricultural it was probably made for Vauxhall by Massey Ferguson. Quick shifting it is not.



What about a 3.2 with the autos diff  :D :D

Anyway, if the tenna pants wearing members of OOF ain't man enough to move the gearstick and press another pedal  ::)  :-* :-* :D

I await the abuse  :P :P

STMO doesn't own an Omega. :D :D ;D
Logged

EMD

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Noofhampton
  • Posts: 3516
    • 95t
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #41 on: 10 March 2016, 14:13:46 »

Only 1 foot required  :D :D :D ;D Get yourself an auto  :P
Logged
Omegatitis

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8610
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #42 on: 10 March 2016, 15:01:53 »

Only 1 foot required  :D :D :D ;D Get yourself an auto  :P


Got one and just can't get on with it  :(
The other 4 miggys i've had was all manual and loved them but this one ............ nah  :(

I just can't get used to putting my foot down out of a corner and not feeling that "direct connection" to the drive wheels  :(
Logged

Tick Tock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Hereford
  • Posts: 665
    • 2.5 V6 Facelift Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #43 on: 10 March 2016, 15:26:00 »

........ why would anyone want a Manual Omega?  :-*

Obviously it's all down to personal preference, and whilst there are more beaten up Omegas out there for sale than ever before, the availability of auto gearboxes is plentiful which means you don't have to fix them.... just bung another one in  :D

But there will come a day I'm sure when they are like rocking horse poo, and although there are plenty of talented enthusiasts on here, an auto box strip down and repair will be beyond the capabilities of most. I'm sure those with manual gearboxes will take a clutch problem with a pinch of salt and be glad of 3-pedals!!

 

Logged
Omega 2.5 V6 Facelift Estate.

Tick Tock

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Hereford
  • Posts: 665
    • 2.5 V6 Facelift Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 manual vs 3.2 auto
« Reply #44 on: 10 March 2016, 15:27:41 »

Don't know what happened there with the quote boxes   >:(

Obviously it's all down to personal preference, and whilst there are more beaten up Omegas out there for sale than ever before, the availability of auto gearboxes is plentiful which means you don't have to fix them.... just bung another one in  :D

But there will come a day I'm sure when they are like rocking horse poo, and although there are plenty of talented enthusiasts on here, an auto box strip down and repair will be beyond the capabilities of most. I'm sure those with manual gearboxes will take a clutch problem with a pinch of salt and be glad of 3-pedals!!
Logged
Omega 2.5 V6 Facelift Estate.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 18 queries.