Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Rover 75  (Read 7168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Viral_Jim

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Telford
  • Posts: 4477
    • Too many, mostly broken
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #15 on: 21 April 2016, 09:42:30 »

I read some of the forums that the Diseasels suffer from poor fuel economy (low 30's) with owners unable to bottom out the issues. Might want to check it out before you commit to one.
Logged

henryd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • west cornwall
  • Posts: 8806
  • VW Touareg R5 tdi Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #16 on: 21 April 2016, 10:36:49 »

Get the V6 - The 1.8 is woeful, and not much better with a Blower strapped to it.

It's a big 'ole bus for a tiny engine.

The 1.8 T I had went like hell,my stepson has it now and loves it(engine rebuilt by me when I bought it so hopefully no issuses there ::))
Logged
other rides 
  mk3 Volvo v70 2.0 Diesel ,Citroen C2, Pug 306 cabriolet
  Sterling elite trekker pikey wagon

henryd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • west cornwall
  • Posts: 8806
  • VW Touareg R5 tdi Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #17 on: 21 April 2016, 10:40:56 »

The V8 is quite a disappointing drive though, they are not hugely powerful although do have good torque, Jag fuel economy figures mind.


It is only the basic 4.6 Ford engine. Which is no better in the Mustang or any of its other homes. The low rpm torque and the exhaust burble is a large part of the appeal.

Can be made quite "usefull" with the addition of a charger :y
Logged
other rides 
  mk3 Volvo v70 2.0 Diesel ,Citroen C2, Pug 306 cabriolet
  Sterling elite trekker pikey wagon

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32544
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #18 on: 21 April 2016, 10:56:03 »

How bout one of these.. Link Looks like this one has sold though.. They do look rather nice, especially with a V8 rumble.

They do sound good , chev engine i think  :-\ but i want to live in the house and not the shed for now  :D

Ford Mustang V8 if I recall, Remember seeing one in action on Top Gear years ago.

With Clarkson smoking a pipe if memory serves.

A bit of a 'sleeper' with a 4.6 litre lump of Detroit under the 'hood'. :y
Logged

EMD

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Noofhampton
  • Posts: 3516
    • 95t
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #19 on: 21 April 2016, 11:12:48 »

Get the V6 - The 1.8 is woeful, and not much better with a Blower strapped to it.

It's a big 'ole bus for a tiny engine.

The 1.8 T I had went like hell,my stepson has it now and loves it(engine rebuilt by me when I bought it so hopefully no issuses there ::))

Interesting . I shall have to test drive one .
Logged
Omegatitis

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #20 on: 21 April 2016, 11:19:45 »

The v8 is worth buying if only because it's rear wheel drive :y
Logged

STEMO

  • Guest
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #21 on: 21 April 2016, 17:25:14 »

I had the 2.5 190 V6 ZT, reasonable acceleration, but ate tyres. Big, fat bastards they were (185, I think), so came with tramlining built in. The cam belt was 90,000 miles, three belts to change, cost me c£700.
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32544
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #22 on: 21 April 2016, 18:30:00 »

I had the 2.5 190 V6 ZT, reasonable acceleration, but ate tyres. Big, fat bastards they were (185, I think), so came with tramlining built in. The cam belt was 90,000 miles, three belts to change, cost me c£700.

Skinny by modern standards.
Logged

omegod

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • liverpool
  • Posts: 4348
    • 2017 Seat Ateca
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #23 on: 21 April 2016, 19:01:33 »

Bought a v6 estate with MOT for £50 recently, lot's of nice noise but no real pull, sold it for £150 the next day. I do like the MG saloon jobbie for it's looks alone 
Logged
Happy to do Omega servicing etc around Merseyside,cruise activation, airbag lights sorted too...

STEMO

  • Guest
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #24 on: 21 April 2016, 19:20:17 »

I had the 2.5 190 V6 ZT, reasonable acceleration, but ate tyres. Big, fat bastards they were (185, I think), so came with tramlining built in. The cam belt was 90,000 miles, three belts to change, cost me c£700.

Skinny by modern standards.
Sorry, yes, I meant 225.

225x45x18.
Logged

serek

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • huntingdon
  • Posts: 1992
    • 3.2 mv6
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #25 on: 21 April 2016, 21:13:20 »

have mg zt cdti 135 with 220 on clock no really issues with it,
lot of car for money tbh

on petrol v6 timing belts replacement is killer,
 those are not nice to replace like on omega, and lots garages charge stupid money

I do a lot work on MG/rovers kv6 and cdti some of parts genuine only
fuel filter cost £40 for example and its inside tank

serek

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • huntingdon
  • Posts: 1992
    • 3.2 mv6
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #26 on: 21 April 2016, 21:15:09 »

Get the V6 - The 1.8 is woeful, and not much better with a Blower strapped to it.

It's a big 'ole bus for a tiny engine.

The 1.8 T I had went like hell,my stepson has it now and loves it(engine rebuilt by me when I bought it so hopefully no issuses there ::))
from economical point they better then kv6 and not much slower too

henryd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • west cornwall
  • Posts: 8806
  • VW Touareg R5 tdi Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #27 on: 21 April 2016, 21:20:02 »

Get the V6 - The 1.8 is woeful, and not much better with a Blower strapped to it.

It's a big 'ole bus for a tiny engine.

The 1.8 T I had went like hell,my stepson has it now and loves it(engine rebuilt by me when I bought it so hopefully no issuses there ::))
from economical point they better then kv6 and not much slower too

Can be chipped to 200 bhp too allegedly, not sure how that would end with a K,mine was lively,mid range grunt was good,made some supposedly quick cars think twice a few times :y
Logged
other rides 
  mk3 Volvo v70 2.0 Diesel ,Citroen C2, Pug 306 cabriolet
  Sterling elite trekker pikey wagon

78bex

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • 0
  • Posts: 1051
    • 2.2 CD AUTO / FAZER 600
    • View Profile
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #28 on: 22 April 2016, 01:16:51 »

Did we get the 75 with the V8 minus the MG badge  ??? the ozzies did

https://youtu.be/wI4I7V0gfFM
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Rover 75
« Reply #29 on: 22 April 2016, 02:07:00 »

Did we get the 75 with the V8 minus the MG badge  ??? the ozzies did

https://youtu.be/wI4I7V0gfFM
Yup.. As above, auto only :y
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 17 queries.