Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Leaded v Super Unleaded.  (Read 2145 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mr Skrunts

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Skruntie Land.
  • Posts: 25677
  • 3.O Elite Saloon with all the toys,
    • 2003 CD 2.2 Auto
    • View Profile
Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« on: 21 July 2008, 18:25:48 »

When I had my Carltons there was a switch under the bonnet that could be altered for 95 or 98 ron fuel which I believe was unleaded or super undeaded fuel.

I also noticed the Carlton ran better on Esso rather some other fuels.

Would Super Unleaded help or hinder my V6 Miggy.

Also has anyone noticed if there is a difference on ecconomy or performance from Brand to Brand.

TIA.   :y
Logged
Ask yourself :  " WHY do I believe in what I believe?"

Remember that my opinions expressed here are not representative of the opinions of other members on the OOF Forum.

albitz

  • Guest
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #1 on: 21 July 2008, 19:06:51 »

there was a similar thread a few months back ,and opinions seemed to vary wildly. :y
Logged

Dusty

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Shropshire
  • Posts: 1302
  • Erotic Romance Author
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #2 on: 21 July 2008, 19:11:50 »

I've heard that Super unleaded can give a performance advantage in very high performance cars.

I've tried it in my V6 Omega but to me it makes no perceptible difference.

I'd save your money if I was you :y :-*

markey mark

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • SLady bitshorpe north lincs
  • Posts: 4236
  • banned for repeatedly reneaging on deals.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #3 on: 21 July 2008, 19:21:43 »

you should find your mpg increases so offsetting the extra cost of super !! mine does run smoother on super  :y
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #4 on: 21 July 2008, 19:23:17 »

The only difference I've ever found is that Tesco99 ron burns quicker than any other fuel I put in the tank, on my V6....

Logged

markey mark

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • SLady bitshorpe north lincs
  • Posts: 4236
  • banned for repeatedly reneaging on deals.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #5 on: 21 July 2008, 19:23:58 »

Quote
The only difference I've ever found is that Tesco99 ron burns quicker than any other fuel I put in the tank, on my V6....


thats your right foot james  ;D ;D
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #6 on: 21 July 2008, 19:25:00 »

Quote
Quote
The only difference I've ever found is that Tesco99 ron burns quicker than any other fuel I put in the tank, on my V6....


thats your right foot james  ;D ;D

Miss Daisy here? Surely not ;D
Logged

markey mark

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • SLady bitshorpe north lincs
  • Posts: 4236
  • banned for repeatedly reneaging on deals.
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #7 on: 21 July 2008, 19:33:34 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
The only difference I've ever found is that Tesco99 ron burns quicker than any other fuel I put in the tank, on my V6....


thats your right foot james  ;D ;D

Miss Daisy here? Surely not ;D

aye aye  :D :D ;D
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32566
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #8 on: 21 July 2008, 19:41:58 »

I have tried the expensive super unleaded.
Money out of my pocket went faster,and that's all. :y
Logged

MikeDundee

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Costa Del Peckham
  • Posts: 9370
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #9 on: 21 July 2008, 19:45:28 »

Quote
I have tried the expensive super unleaded.
Money out of my pocket went faster,and that's all. :y


Yeah been there :-X..........don't notice any major difference, so just stick to normal unleaded, only use BP garages ::)
Logged

mars

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cannock, Staffordshire
  • Posts: 2508
    • Vivaro Sportive BMW 330d
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #10 on: 21 July 2008, 20:04:51 »

Only ever had one car that there was a noticeable difference between leaded and super-unleaded and that was a 1.9 Peugot 205Gti. Don't think performance was much different but engine just seemed to run better. :-?
Logged
There is no such thing as bad beer, some beers are better than others.

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36418
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #11 on: 21 July 2008, 20:09:18 »

Higher octane doesn't mean more power (if anything, the greater percentage of additives may actually reduce the calorific value of the fuel).

It means it can be burnt in a highly tuned engine with a greater margin over detonation occurring which is where the fuel burns in an uncontrolled manner causing a great deal of mechanical stress and excess heat, and, if it goes unchecked for more than a few seconds, causing serious damage.

Knock sensors are there in modern engines to detect this and respond by retarding the ignition and, on turbocharged engines, sometimes reducing the boost pressure. This reduces the performance of the engine.

The upshot is that it makes a great deal of difference to those who run highly tuned or turbocharged engines. The engines used in the Omega aren't turbocharged nor particularly highly tuned so they are unlikely to go into knock retard on 95 octane fuel, meaning there is unlikely to be much to be gained from Super Unleaded.

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Big_Roger

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Southampton
  • Posts: 367
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #12 on: 22 July 2008, 00:14:33 »

Hi,
I had to use super unleaded some weeks back as thats all there was available at all night garage. Never made a scrap of difference to the running of the engine.

What did give me grief was tankfull of Jet garage fuel. EML light continually on and check was Catalytic convertor low efficiency problem.  Fine when I finally got tankfull of Shell.

Roger
Logged
Be patient ! Something else will go wrong for you to fix if you wait long enough !!

Lazydocker

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Woodbridge, Suffolk
  • Posts: 18848
  • Constantly Bullied by a certain Admin
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #13 on: 22 July 2008, 10:20:32 »

I only ever noticed the difference when I used it in my bike... Never seen a difference in a car though!
Logged
Whatever it is... I didn't do it

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Leaded v Super Unleaded.
« Reply #14 on: 22 July 2008, 12:25:24 »

Probally going off track here, but I notice a big difference between Super Diesel and Standard.

Lots more MPG and smoother running.

As for petrol in My MV6 no difference, it seems to like Shell though for very slightly improved MPG, which suprises me cause I all ways thought Shell was the worst of the Big Ones?.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 16 queries.