Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Running cost comparison  (Read 2472 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Running cost comparison
« on: 15 November 2008, 16:46:44 »

Just did a few sums, as I am sat at home feeling yucky and sorry for myself:

3.0 V6 running cost:

At 28mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 14.93p per mile
500 miles will cost you 74.65




3.0 V6 on LPG running cost:

At 22mpg, With LPG at 52.9p, cost is 10.95p per mile
500 miles will cost you 54.75




2.2 DTi running cost:


At 42mpg, with diesel at 106.9p, cost is 11.58p per mile
500 miles will cost you 57.90



Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34029
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #1 on: 15 November 2008, 16:52:40 »

2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

« Last Edit: 15 November 2008, 16:52:48 by Mark »
Logged

waspy

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #2 on: 15 November 2008, 16:54:03 »

Quote
Just did a few sums, as I am sat at home feeling yucky and sorry for myself:

3.0 V6 running cost:

At 28mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 14.93p per mile
500 miles will cost you 74.65




3.0 V6 on LPG running cost:

At 22mpg, With LPG at 52.9p, cost is 10.95p per mile
500 miles will cost you 54.75




2.2 DTi running cost:


At 42mpg, with diesel at 106.9p, cost is 11.58p per mile
500 miles will cost you 57.90




I'll be quite honest & say that if i was buying another Mig, i would go for 3.2V6 with LPG & bite the bullet over the VED. For how many miles i drive (which come the end of dec will be around 5000). I'd still have the good return & have warp speed to boot :D
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107122
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #3 on: 15 November 2008, 16:57:36 »

Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

Yes, Miss Daisy....
Logged
Grumpy old man

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #4 on: 15 November 2008, 16:58:47 »

Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

Yes, Miss Daisy....

I've only ever had 38mpg out of a V6 on a long run, but I agree it is do-able..
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37588
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #5 on: 15 November 2008, 17:24:38 »

Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

Yes, Miss Daisy....

You must drive slower than Mother tunnie!

If you aint got the mpg with a the 2 in the front, your not driving it right!
« Last Edit: 15 November 2008, 17:24:53 by tunnie »
Logged

Mr Skrunts

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Skruntie Land.
  • Posts: 25690
  • 3.O Elite Saloon with all the toys,
    • 2003 CD 2.2 Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #6 on: 15 November 2008, 17:28:36 »

Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85


What sort of speed to achieve 38 mpg.

Best I managed was 24 mpg in my GLS but no computer to help keep an eye on consumption. :-/
Logged
Ask yourself :  " WHY do I believe in what I believe?"

Remember that my opinions expressed here are not representative of the opinions of other members on the OOF Forum.

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107122
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #7 on: 15 November 2008, 17:33:40 »

Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85


What sort of speed to achieve 38 mpg.

Best I managed was 24 mpg in my GLS but no computer to help keep an eye on consumption. :-/
He is doing a lot of significant motorway runs to work and back at the moment...
Logged
Grumpy old man

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #8 on: 15 November 2008, 17:34:56 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

Yes, Miss Daisy....

You must drive slower than Mother tunnie!

If you aint got the mpg with a the 2 in the front, your not driving it right!


That is taking it easy

I managed 10mpg around town today - bad traffic
Logged

Richie London

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • heathrow
  • Posts: 10932
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #9 on: 15 November 2008, 17:35:53 »

i got this in april i think it was, that was doing about 55mph down the motorway,  :)


Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #10 on: 15 November 2008, 17:47:59 »

for me 38 mpg in city traffic is only possible with a 4 pot clit,  

sometimes even worse as I do short runs and hammer it..

with miggy the best average was 26-27 mpg in city..

but of course on highway travels I catch those figures..
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36424
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #11 on: 15 November 2008, 17:52:09 »

I think the petrol to LPG gap is a little bigger than that. 22MPG on gas is commuting territory, which won't give you 28 on petrol, IME. Also, whilst I can get gas at 51.9 here, it can be had from motorway services for 52.9 and the cheapest petrol here is 93.9.

My fuel costs are now lower than for my 1.8 8v manual petrol mk1 Laguna back in 2006. I have an extra 2 cylinders, an extra 117 BHP, RWD and an auto gearbox. 8-)

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #12 on: 15 November 2008, 18:53:34 »

Quote
Just did a few sums, as I am sat at home feeling yucky and sorry for myself:

3.0 V6 running cost:

At 28mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 14.93p per mile
500 miles will cost you 74.65




3.0 V6 on LPG running cost:

At 22mpg, With LPG at 52.9p, cost is 10.95p per mile
500 miles will cost you 54.75




2.2 DTi running cost:


At 42mpg, with diesel at 106.9p, cost is 11.58p per mile
500 miles will cost you 57.90




A saving of £20 per 500 miles. So, if a conversion at a garage costs £1500, you can make it back in 37500 miles. :-?
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39797
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #13 on: 15 November 2008, 20:16:24 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

Yes, Miss Daisy....

I've only ever had 38mpg out of a V6 on a long run, but I agree it is do-able..

I don't disbelieve you but don't know how. I drove back from Guy's last weekend & saw 32.odd, and that's cos I reset it on the motorway. The weather was lousy & so was only doing around 65/70 till I got to the M62. As soon as I started driving at 75/80 the mpg went down towards 30. It's rapidly on the downhill now (27.something) that it's used around town ... occasionally.
You've either a magic wand or a very very light right foot.  ;)  :y
Logged

theolodian

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 3654
  • I need a new avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #14 on: 15 November 2008, 20:19:10 »

I find the higher insurance for a 3L the annoying part.  >:(
Logged
Trains may have been invented here, but public transport is a foreign concept!
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.009 seconds with 17 queries.