Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Running cost comparison  (Read 2457 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39797
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #15 on: 15 November 2008, 22:01:13 »

Quote
I find the higher insurance for a 3L the annoying part.  >:(

What's insurance like in America? I ask because, my daughter was at Lancaster uni with some US students last year, who couldn't get their head around the huge cost of car insurance over here, like wise, my daughter couldn't get her head around the fact that a lot of these young Americans were driving car of 4, 5 6 litres/liters at a very young age at home.
Logged

Mr Skrunts

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Skruntie Land.
  • Posts: 25690
  • 3.O Elite Saloon with all the toys,
    • 2003 CD 2.2 Auto
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #16 on: 15 November 2008, 22:06:24 »

My cousin went to Canada when she was 16.  She learnt to drive in a 6.6 litre liter trans am, and the nearst post box was 15 miles away.  What a life.  So every day they did a minmum 30 mile run just getting used to the car.   :y :y  Fuel and insurance where peanuts. :-/
Logged
Ask yourself :  " WHY do I believe in what I believe?"

Remember that my opinions expressed here are not representative of the opinions of other members on the OOF Forum.

theolodian

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 3654
  • I need a new avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #17 on: 15 November 2008, 22:06:53 »

Quote
Quote
I find the higher insurance for a 3L the annoying part.  >:(

What's insurance like in America? I ask because, my daughter was at Lancaster uni with some US students last year, who couldn't get their head around the huge cost of car insurance over here, like wise, my daughter couldn't get her head around the fact that a lot of these young Americans were driving car of 4, 5 6 litres/liters at a very young age at home.
It varies quite a bit from state to state if you are under 25.  I used to pay in dollars what the Omega is in pounds.  However, you pay month to month.  None of this buy a year up front and then they can cancel it BS.  >:(
Logged
Trains may have been invented here, but public transport is a foreign concept!

dieseldean

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • chesterfield
  • Posts: 1217
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #18 on: 15 November 2008, 22:26:45 »

the running cost must also be weighed up on aspects of servicing costs and life expectancy of the vehicle. i know my tractor is not a good exaqmple as it is poorlysick at the moment but a diesel will outlast a petrol and when serviced needs less attention
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39797
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #19 on: 15 November 2008, 22:57:43 »

Quote
./....
 in a 6.6 litre liter trans am, and  .....

I always loved those cars ......the huge great eagle on the bonnet hood. I liked the tail lights all across the back. And those unconerted from the US had 'turn signals' that were half across the car.
Logged

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #20 on: 15 November 2008, 23:01:10 »

Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85


where did you or even how did you get 38mpg in the 2.5 from?
going down a hill :P?
i'v never seen 38 mpg in the 2.0 even on the motorway!
Logged
V8!!!!

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #21 on: 15 November 2008, 23:31:16 »

Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85


where did you or even how did you get 38mpg in the 2.5 from?
going down a hill :P?
i'v never seen 38 mpg in the 2.0 even on the motorway!

I have done that, in our old manual 2.0L estate. Some years ago when the fuel blockades were on I drove it sensibly in town and never above 50mph on m 12 mile commute, got near 40mpg, was boring as hell though...... ;D ;D ;D
Logged

ngrainqey

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • rotherham
  • Posts: 2193
    • BMW E92, 2.6 CD F/L Est.
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #22 on: 15 November 2008, 23:37:51 »

lol highest i ever saw in the 2.0 was 33 on the way back from london after my holiday down to newquay and that was takin it steady!
Logged
V8!!!!

Taxi_Driver

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #23 on: 16 November 2008, 00:13:18 »

You all wanna buy a merc Viano 2.2 ..... ;D

Tho it hasnt got a fuel comp in it....so i carnt state exact figures........

All i know is its costing me less in diesel or about the same as my omega did on LPG .....

OK floor it and it drinks diesel but treat it gently.....and it sips it  ;)

150bhp i think it is.....coz its auto...

The comp is a bit cleverer than the omega..... its been telling me for last few days i got a bulb blown.....its saying a number plate bulb is blown....which is correct! lol!!
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #24 on: 16 November 2008, 00:19:00 »

Quote
You all wanna buy a merc Viano 2.2 ..... ;D

Tho it hasnt got a fuel comp in it....so i carnt state exact figures........

All i know is its costing me less in diesel or about the same as my omega did on LPG .....

OK floor it and it drinks diesel but treat it gently.....and it sips it  ;)

150bhp i think it is.....coz its auto...
The comp is a bit cleverer than the omega..... its been telling me for last few days i got a bulb blown.....its saying a number plate bulb is blown....which is correct! lol!!


Another convert, the only way to drive.... ;D ;D ;D
Logged

doog

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alloa Central Scotland
  • Posts: 1022
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #25 on: 16 November 2008, 00:57:13 »

Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

38mpg?

how do you get that ? i am getting 22mpg and theres is nothing wrong withthe motor  and its been serviced recently  

your going to blame it on my right foot??
Doug
Logged
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for
me at kick boxing

amigov6

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #26 on: 16 November 2008, 02:05:24 »

Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

38mpg?

how do you get that ? i am getting 22mpg and theres is nothing wrong withthe motor  and its been serviced recently  

your going to blame it on my right foot??
Doug
I zeroed the computer when i left Lakes 07 in my 2.5 manual (Kates baby now) & @ 80/90 plus the odd squirt here & there but taking it easy showed 35.2 when i got home.
    Let's not forget that most of these MFD's are a gimmick & not to be taken as gospel with mpg range etc. Best thing about them is if all your pixels are still working!!! ::)
Logged

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #27 on: 16 November 2008, 02:34:13 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
2.5 V6 running cost:

At 38mpg, with petrol at 91.9p, cost is 11.97p per mile
500 miles will cost you 59.85

Yes, Miss Daisy....

I've only ever had 38mpg out of a V6 on a long run, but I agree it is do-able..

I don't disbelieve you but don't know how. I drove back from Guy's last weekend & saw 32.odd, and that's cos I reset it on the motorway. The weather was lousy & so was only doing around 65/70 till I got to the M62. As soon as I started driving at 75/80 the mpg went down towards 30. It's rapidly on the downhill now (27.something) that it's used around town ... occasionally.
You've either a magic wand or a very very light right foot.  ;)  :y
And a manual box! I'd rather have the fuel bill than bugger about with the other 2 limbs. 1 hand and one foot, all you need.

Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36424
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #28 on: 16 November 2008, 17:38:23 »

Quote
And a manual box! I'd rather have the fuel bill than bugger about with the other 2 limbs. 1 hand and one foot, all you need.


Auto probably doesn't make much difference on a motorway cruise (IIRC, they're slightly higher geared so may even help economy). They will drink considerably more at sub-50 MPH, of course, which seems to be most of the time these days thanks to the dawdlers on the roads. >:(

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Running cost comparison
« Reply #29 on: 16 November 2008, 17:43:44 »

Quote
Quote
And a manual box! I'd rather have the fuel bill than bugger about with the other 2 limbs. 1 hand and one foot, all you need.


Auto probably doesn't make much difference on a motorway cruise (IIRC, they're slightly higher geared so may even help economy). They will drink considerably more at sub-50 MPH, of course, which seems to be most of the time these days thanks to the dawdlers on the roads. >:(

Kevin


Mine drops into top gear at about 48mph - so everyone in front of me always does 46  >:(
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 17 queries.